Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Edited for Rule 12.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Tricky
 
Last edited by a moderator:
bill smith said:
I have noticed that both no-planers and Judy Wood are total anathema to Shilldom. In all honesty it's like a pointing finger. lol
Click to expand...

If you had the slightest clue about physics you'd understand why we laugh a Woods.

If you had the slightest clue about how to weigh evidence, you'd understand why we laugh at no-planers.

But you don't.

You have placed yourself in the "get laughed at" club.
 
BigAl said:
If you had the slightest clue about physics you'd understand why we laugh a Woods.

If you had the slightest clue about how to weigh evidence, you'd understand why we laugh at no-planers.

But you don't.

You have placed yourself in the "get laughed at" club.
Click to expand...

Oh well, never mind. Sticks and stones and all that....
I normally follow Gandhi's advice on the subject.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win" - Mahatma Gandhi.
 
bill smith said:
Oh well, never mind. Sticks and stones and all that....
I normally follow Gandhi's advice on the subject.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win" - Mahatma Gandhi.
Click to expand...
Oh, so now you're Gandhi? Really? No ego problems here, are there?

I think we can all just stop at the "laugh at you" part. There's nothing to fight, and nothing to win. Just mockery of the emptiness of your posts.
 
bill smith said:
Oh well, never mind. Sticks and stones and all that....
I normally follow Gandhi's advice on the subject.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win" - Mahatma Gandhi.
Click to expand...

You've got the first two mastered. Feel free to move on to that last part anytime.
 
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win" - Mahatma Gandhi.
Click to expand...
This works when you are right and your enemy is rational. 911Truth is not right they are the anti-intellectual cult of false ideas.

911Truth gets everything wrong; quoting Gandhi is ironic from delusion believers. "then" for 911Truth is never.

911Truth is pure delusion; their evidence is the empty set. 7 years, 7 months, and 19 days of stupid ideas and failure.
 
Last edited:
JimBenArm said:
Oh, so now you're Gandhi? Really? No ego problems here, are there?

I think we can all just stop at the "laugh at you" part. There's nothing to fight, and nothing to win. Just mockery of the emptiness of your posts.
Click to expand...

I always hink that Gandhi missed out a step. 'then they laugh at you in a strained way'....(comes right after 'then they laugh at you'). It will be like that almost to the end but I would have expected that anyway.
 
bill smith said:
I always hink that Gandhi missed out a step. 'then they laugh at you in a strained way'....(comes right after 'then they laugh at you'). It will be like that almost to the end but I would have expected that anyway.
Click to expand...
The only straining here is trying to breathe while continuing to guffaw at the nonsense.
 
Pardalis said:
If anyone needed proof that Bill is under the age of 12.
Click to expand...

Rice Krispies are liars. Everybody knows that. Try Cornflakes instead- they have a reputation for honesty. Porridge is positively saintly.
 
Last edited:
Pardalis said:
Well I'll leave it up to you, this seems to be your area of expertise.
Click to expand...
He's trying (and failing) to do humor about my sig. Typical truther thing. Funny when trying to be serious, seriously unfunny when trying to do comedy.
 
bill smith said:
What's wrong teddy ? You seem more weak and ineffectual than usual today ?
Click to expand...
.

bill,

Do you mean "weak & ineffectual" as in this reply to what was a serious couple of questions?

Or, perhaps you mean "as opposed to the strength & credibility that infuses one's arguments by addressing people by the wrong name?"

Is that what you mean?

Here. Let me give it a try, Frank.

Wow. I think my arguments are acquiring a new forcefulness & authority, Harold.

Why didn't I think of this before, Juan?

:rolleyes:

tom
 
tfk said:
.

bill,

Do you mean "weak & ineffectual" as in this reply to what was a serious couple of questions?

Or, perhaps you mean "as opposed to the strength & credibility that infuses one's arguments by addressing people by the wrong name?"

Is that what you mean?

Here. Let me give it a try, Frank.

Wow. I think my arguments are acquiring a new forcefulness & authority, Harold.

Why didn't I think of this before, Juan?

:rolleyes:

tom
Click to expand...

Maybe you didn't juant to be a juan trick pony.
 
Pardalis said:
If anyone needed proof that Bill is under the age of 12.
Click to expand...
Even worse, he has adopted an avatar that depicts my shoes, but with some butt ugly feet in them. He's clearly dis-info. I don't have those ugly veins and pudgy bits.
 
Last edited:
bill,

I asked a serious question.

First you assert:
bill smith said:
I find this [camera] shot HIGHLY suspect. [The cameraman] clearly KNEW where the jet was going to hit.
Click to expand...

Then, you cavalierly admit:
bill smith said:
I only leave [the camera position] there TAM as a kind of bait.
Click to expand...

You dance back & forth between assertion and gamesmanship with reckless disrespect.

And, in the process, generate mountains of animosity.

Gandhi would not approve.

tom
 
LashL said:
Even worse, he has adopted an avatar that depicts my shoes, but with some butt ugly feet in them. He's clearly dis-info. I don't have those ugly veins and pudgy bits.
Click to expand...

Now now Sweetie..let's not be catty. I doubt that you could fill my shoes anyway to say nothing about other parts of my wardrobe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom