4th August - epilogue - 19th September - prediction

[BillHoyt]

All Hail the superior power of JREF's satanic anti-psi! Buwah-hah-hah-haa

 

[Dancing David]

What a doofus, so Eurpean/American centered, you blew it Lucianarcy, you did not predict the future, you did not predict "the attcks will be thwarted because of three year old intelligence".

Meanwhile 14,000 children will die today because of preventable illness and other treatable conditions.
Over 250 million women and children will be physicaly, emotionaly and sexualy abused today.
Around the world over three million people will remain as displaced refugees due to war.


Your predictions are worthless, they are self centered and naricisisstic, if you have such great powers why don't you use them to make yourself rich and then go and alleviate the suffering the world, you don't have to be a psychic to predict the suffering.

 

[Flo]

You are welcome to your opinion, Flo.

But the fact is, there was an extremely high security alert enforced through the intelligence agancies over that period. Ergo, a high risk of attack against western targets by terrorists existed.

Thankfully, such action on intelligence would have foiled any planned attack.

Blah, blah, blah ... anybody following the news those last few years can "predict" that there will be some attacks sometime and that precautions from intelligence agencies will foil some of them. You've doubly made a fool of yourself by trying to pass a banality for a "profecy" and by trying to get out of the hole you've dug yourself in with extremely lame excuses.

edited to add:

and on top of it, you're not even the least little bit original/entertaining in a) your attempts at pretending to be psychically gifted and b) your very, very lame excuses.

 

[MRC_Hans]

*snip*
But the fact is, there was an extremely high security alert enforced through the intelligence agancies over that period. Ergo, a high risk of attack against western targets by terrorists existed.

*snip*

The risk surely existed, that is not what we discuss, Lucianarchy. We discuss your prediction:

Did you predict:

1) That an increased risk of terrism would exist in the weeks around Aug. 4th?

2) That a serious attack would be averted on Aug. 4th?

3) That a serious attack would occur on Aug. 4th?

No need to answer, it is firmly on record that you predicted #3.

Did a serious attack occur on Aug. 4th?

No need to answer, it is a fact that none did.

So was your predition right or wrong?

Do answer that question.

Hans

 

[princhester]

Re: Re: 4th August - epilogue - 19th September - prediction

Why did you start a new thread, Luci? Was it because you wanted a bit of distance between your prediction and the "epilogue"?

Because what you said originally was

[size=large]"I percieve that something awful will occur that day. An attack on a Western target"[/size]

Now I've read that a number of times, and I just can't seem to read it to mean "I perceive a risk of something awful" or "I perceive a risk of an attack" or "I perceive something awful or an attack will be foiled by heightened security".

Nope, you predicted an attack and an awful thing, and you were wrong.

You know it too, which is why you've learned a lesson and your prediction for 19 September is merely of a "high risk window for similar attacks".

Analysis:

- if there is an attack, you'll claim credit
- if there isn't an actual attack, you'll say "well, there wasn't an attack but it was a high risk time". There will be the usual perception of risk of an attack in the "window" around the anniversary of 9/11, so you will be right in your prediction.

May as well congratulate you now, I already know your prediction is going to be right.

Good one buddy, your powers are phenomenal.

 

[BPSCG]

...as they say, "Even a blind wombat could get lucky once in a while."
Why they say that and who they are, I have no idea.

Around these parts, they say "Even a blind pig finds the trough now and then."

And "they" is me. And a number of my colleagues currently meeting in an undisclosed location.

 

[Prester John]

I percieve that something awful will occur that day. An attack on a Western target (UK, USA, Europe).

So which part of this was correct then?

 

[Flo]

So which part of this was correct then?

Well, the scorn we attacked Luci with during the whole of the 4th must definitely have felt awful, and I believe he's in the UK, so ...

 

[princhester]

So which part of this was correct then?

If we assume Luci is deluded rather than lying, then perhaps the whole of his statement is true. He did indeed perceive there would be an attack.

Unfortunately his perception was wrong.

 

[BPSCG]

So we had a vague, non-specific prediction and when even that turned out to be wrong, we got an excuse that subsequent events made the prediction false.

Okay. Here's my prediction: I predict the Yankees will win this year's World Series. Unless another team finds a way to beat them.

Remember, you read it here first.

 

[CFLarsen]

Fool.

Thankfully, the CIA, FBI, DIA, MI5 etc pre-empted any attack planned for the 4th August with the unprecedented heightened security on major Western targets.

In addition, on the 4th August, MI5 managed to arrest up to 12 terrorists in the UK who were planning an attack on Heathrow.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3537462.stm.

This has nothing to do with your prediction.

Like the 'Ladybrook' perception, it seems that attacks may not necessarily take place, they may be thwarted either bu intelligence tip-offs, or other action taken between the time of perception and the planned time of the attack.

Interesting. You have just admitted that you did not predict the "ladybrook terrorist attack", but one that was thwarted. Ergo, it didn't happen. That you have previously claimed that such an "attack" happened, is only testament to your delusion and deceit.

Obviously, the intelligence reports from the major agencies have proved that attacks were planned for this time, yet the correct application of intelligence can defeat terrorism if they act on all lines of communication.

Doesn't matter. Your prediction did not come true.

I have percieved 19th September as another high risk window for similar attacks and hope and pray that the intelligence agancies agian act to thwart such an attack.

Similar to what??? Be specific.

If that had not happened, then I would of course say that the prediction was not significant. However, there evidently was an extremely high risk, so the predition remains significant.

Fool.

But the fact is, there was an extremely high security alert enforced through the intelligence agancies over that period. Ergo, a high risk of attack against western targets by terrorists existed.

Based on 3 year old intelligence, yes. And no attack happened. Your prediction did not come true.

Thankfully, such action on intelligence would have foiled any planned attack.

How do you know this?

Peace.

Fool.

 

[Paul C. Anagnostopoulos]

Apparently, Luci's predictions are based on the current state of affaris at the time of the prediction, rather than being actual precognitive visions. That is why this particular prediction was not accurate: Something was done in the meantime to change the state of affairs (heightened security).

This is called informed guessing, not precognition.

~~ Paul

 

[Mercutio]

Apparently, Luci's predictions are based on the current state of affaris at the time of the prediction, rather than being actual precognitive visions. That is why this particular prediction was not accurate: Something was done in the meantime to change the state of affairs (heightened security).

This is called informed guessing, not precognition.

~~ Paul

Informed?

 

[Jeff Corey]

Maybe someone who has an archive including all L's incorrect predictions, including "Ladybrook", could assemble them into an article for Skeptic Report.

 

[Ersby]

Oh, Lucian, this is pathetic.

You made a guess. You got it wrong. Completely wrong. Face up to it. Be a man. Paul Bethke used exactly the same tactics as you and he was a dismal clown, and if you want to become one to (assuming you aren't already) that's fine. I'm sure one of the admin people will happily change your field name. Just drop the Dr Steinkamp/Home Office claims, too. If you don't mind.

 

[Ersby]

And your original link doesn't work.

Peace.

 

[Doubt]

I will again offer a counter prediction:

I have perceived 19th September as another window for similar positive event and hope and pray that the I will profit from the event without interference from intelligence agencies acting to thwarting such an event.

 

[Marian]

I have percieved 19th September as another high risk window for similar attacks and hope and pray that the intelligence agancies agian act to thwart such an attack.

Peace.

 

[chillzero]

And your original link doesn't work.

Peace.

You need to delete the fullstop at the end of the link when it opens.

 

[Interesting Ian]

in other words..."I predicted something would happen and it did not."

By your standards, I can predict someone's death but when they cease to expire on my predicted day I could thank his doctors for recommending he keep his weight down therefore preventing his early demise. I predicted his death but thank goodness it was thwarted by the diligence of his doctors.

You are deluded.

Far be it for me to defend silly predictions, but you're being ludicrous here. Are you actually suggesting that the future is laid down and that there is nothing we can do to prevent it happening?

Besides, the evidence suggests that when people do, say, dream of a future event, they can take actions to prevent it happening; especially so if it is an event which would have happened to them.