300 DVDs from WTC7 collapse has Infowars on their feet again

[Panoply_Prefect]

The headline has it "Did NIST Edit WTC 7 Footage To Hide Evidence Of Implosion?"

Apparently something called "The international center for 911 studies" has managed to get some 300 DVDs of video an footage from the WTC7 collapse via FOIA (albeit Infowars has it "from lawsuit"):
http://www.infowars.com/did-nist-edit-wtc-7-footage-to-hide-evidence-of-implosion/

The angle from Infowars is predictable, but it'll still be interesting to see the material.

 

[femr2]

There are some initial releases here...

http://www.youtube.com/user/IC911STUDIES#g/u

The full set will be released via BitTorrent.

 

[Disbelief]

This brings up the question: If the government was behind 9/11, why would they release ANY incriminating evidence just because of an FOIA request?

 

[djlunacee]

This brings up the question: If the government was behind 9/11, why would they release ANY incriminating evidence just because of an FOIA request?

WeThey wouldn't, under the guise of national security.

 

[MG1962]

Okay help me out. I think I am missing something. Why should the NIST be investigating the Battle of Thermopylae

 

[The Big Dog]

There are some initial releases here...

http://www.youtube.com/user/IC911STUDIES#g/u

The full set will be released via BitTorrent.

"explosion heard at 11 second mark."

Facepalm. There was no explosion there at all.

 

[Panoply_Prefect]

"explosion heard at 11 second mark."

Facepalm. There was no explosion there at all.

The benchmark Infowars uses in that article as evidence of explosion seem to be a windgust. And a rather weak one as well.

 

[BigAl]

I suspect we've seen this data already and discussed in this thread and others.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=175052

 

[Miragememories]

I suspect we've seen this data already and discussed in this thread and others.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=175052

You can only hope.

MM

 

[jaydeehess]

This brings up the question: If the government was behind 9/11, why would they release ANY incriminating evidence just because of an FOIA request?

Because they hafta of course. Its like asking an undercover cop if he's a cop. He's gotta tell ya da truth!

 

[jaydeehess]

You can only hope.

MM

You have some insight as to there being some video in the bunch that has not been discussed here?

 

[femr2]

You have some insight as to there being some video in the bunch that has not been discussed here?

The full set consists of ~7000Gb.

The previous release was ~26Gb.

 

[jaydeehess]

The full set consists of ~7000Gb.

The previous release was ~26Gb.

Lovely, better quality, less compression or actually previously unseen video?

Would MM or you please point to one that you believe has not been discussed here yet so we do not start re-hashing old stuff again?

I watched the one that is supposed to have the sound of explosions at 10-11 seconds in. I did not hear any such thing. Around that time one begins to start hearing the rumble of WTC7's collapse though.
The people screaming is the loudest thing on the tape furgawdssake.

 

[BigAl]

The full set consists of ~7000Gb.

The previous release was ~26Gb.

Even if all the DVDs are full, your math is impossibly high.

 

[jaydeehess]

"explosion heard at 11 second mark."

Facepalm. There was no explosion there at all.

Ahhh, I see there are at least two videos claiming a WTC 7 explosion at around 11 seconds in the clip.
In the one that specifically states "11 second" it may be a wind gust but this is just before the east penthouse collapses in. The NIST report would have the 30+ floors between initial failure and the penthouse having collapsed AND THEN the east penthouse falling inward. The sound being heard then is the rumble of that internal collapse reaching the mic.
Its hardly the sharp bang of a cutting charge.

 

[jaydeehess]

Even if all the DVDs are full, your math is impossibly high.

Indeed, 300 DVD's at 17G each is 5100G.
Good catch.

7000G is over 400 DVDs at 17G each.

The more common double layer single side disc is less than 10G each

 

[femr2]

Even if all the DVDs are full, your math is impossibly high.

Eh ? No *math* involved. Over 300 DVD's and a bunch of external drives. They've recieved over 3Tb so far, with much more to come. As far as I'm aware the full set will reach 7Tb.

Think it's safe to say more than 26Gb.

 

[Lennart Hyland]

There are some initial releases here...

http://www.youtube.com/user/IC911STUDIES#g/u

The full set will be released via BitTorrent.

hmm I couldnt see or hear any explosion at all in those clips...

 

[jaydeehess]

Eh ? No *math* involved. Over 300 DVD's and a bunch of external drives. They've recieved over 3Tb so far, with much more to come. As far as I'm aware the full set will reach 7Tb.

Think it's safe to say more than 26Gb.

Do any of the above links give out that info (300DVDs and a bunch of external drives)?

So 3TB so far and you are guessing at 7TB once all is said and done. Gotcha.

Now back to my question. point to one that has not been discussed

 

[femr2]

Lovely, better quality, less compression or actually previously unseen video?

I doubt there will be an awful lot of *new* footage, but most definitely a whole bunch of MUCH better quality versions.

please point to one that you believe has not been discussed here yet so we do not start re-hashing old stuff again?

Will have to wait until the Torrents are up.

I'm waiting for the full length NIST Cam#3 original first. That'll be handy. And unseen. Then there's bound to be the WTC7 videos with bits missing doing the rounds. Hopefully the full versions are in the pot somewhere. If not I'm sure they'll be requested, so they should eventually turn up.

Do any of the above links give out that info (300DVDs and a bunch of external drives)?

Dunno. This one does though...
http://911blogger.com/news/2010-08-31/international-center-911-studies-secures-release-thousands-photos-and-videos-nist