dasmiller
Just the right amount of cowbell
Before there was XKCD, we had Latka to explain things such as happiness to us:
There's also the idea that women used to provide just as much value, except now it's more efficient for everyone to specialize, be paid in cash, then use the cash to buy mass-produced items.
For example, rather than having each farm-wife growing vegetables in her kitchen garden, preserving food for the winter and cooking meals from scratch, it's more efficient for some people to get paid for working eight hours at large-scale vegetable production, others to work in the canning/freezing industry, others to work in the trucking industry, others to build microwave ovens and refrigerators, then all come home to store-bought ready-to-microwave meals they can prepare in five minutes, which each had a small part in producing. Repeat for the making of clothing, mending, knitting, laundry, etc.
<snip>
To bring this back on topic, it's funny how a lot of happiness is relative. Take a woman (or man) from 200 or 300 years ago and suddenly give her all the conveniences of the 21st century, and she would be astounded at the luxury and convenience.
But we don't spend every day in amazed joy that we don't have to keep the fire going, haul water, and hitch up the horses for an all-day trip of 20 miles, because we consider ease and luxury only in comparison to what we're used to.
These are the three keys to happiness:
1. Your Spouse. [...]
2. Become a vegetarian, better yet a vegan. [...]
3. Be unselfish. [...]
IIRC, happiness is in a large part to do with how well you think you're doing compared to your peers.
You don't have to give someone a pay cut to make them less happy, just give everyone paid the same or less than them a rise.
This is probably why inequality is such a tough problem to solve. No matter how much people have, they still resent those around them with less catching up.
Are you talking about vegans or goldbugs?In my experience, everyone around them feels like it's longer, too, depending on how much the vegan insists on talking about diet. Can't they just do it, rather than talk about it? I always think that when people insist on talking about their personal beliefs that much they're trying to convince themselves, not the audience.
So I'm guessing from the first 4 letters of this post that you have a study tucked away somewhere that empirically shows evidence of this claim?
<snip>
Does money buy happiness, or does happiness come indirectly from the higher rank in society that money brings? We tested a rank-income hypothesis, according to which people gain utility from the ranked position of their income within a comparison group. The rank hypothesis contrasts with traditional reference-income hypotheses, which suggest that utility from income depends on comparison to a social reference-group norm. We found that the ranked position of an individual's income predicts general life satisfaction, whereas absolute income and reference income have no effect. Furthermore, individuals weight upward comparisons more heavily than downward comparisons. According to the rank hypothesis, income and utility are not directly linked: Increasing an individual's income will increase his or her utility only if ranked position also increases and will necessarily reduce the utility of others who will lose rank.
Because...my happiness is far less dependent on comparing myself with everyone around me so much as earning enough to live a comfortable lifestyle (note that comfort doesn't require thousand plus dollar shopping sprees at big designer outfitters, I'm a jeans and t-shirt kinda guy) and not have to worry about being able to pay my bills.

I did and I applaud you good sir. That really should have ended the thread.And don't forget to go to the link in my post and check out the poster's name.![]()