You have stated, numerous times: by law no ID is required to vote in California.
And it has been pointed out to you, numerous times, tnis is a FALSE statement!
You continue to double down on it, over and over again, as a deliberate lie--or perhaps to attempt to cover up your ignorance.
It has been pointed out to you, numerous times, that CA expressly requires voter ID--regardless of what form that takes--in order to register to vote, which in turn is needed to vote! In fact, that is their public argument in favor of the law forbidding an ID *presentation* by local officials--that it is a redundant requirement! whether that is an adequate burden to meet to ensure a fair process is a separate issue--and until you acknowledge that basic fact, continuing to lie about it, and bringing up side issues about whether or not AB 60 ID is a recipe for voter fraud, there is no getting through your thick skull. So stop obfuscating and bring yourself up to speed on the facts if you want to make an argument as a "real" skeptic!
ETA: in anticipation of your repeated claim that we are splitting hairs about ID requirements--I have just told you, that in 6 states I have voted in for decades, I have never had to present an ID upon voting *in person* at the polls! So stop insisting that CA is making some sort of novel requirement to vote. It's only novel in your paranoid, delusional brain!
apnews.com
If the race ends up 217 democrats and 218 GOP, then what? Are there individual house members that would vote to kick out every illegal, but would still refuse to repeal Obamacare?
