• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: 2024 Election Thread part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hmm .. interesting .. project 538 changed their poll page to include Harris only:

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/national/

Of course, the battleground states are more important, but polls with decent size and state level resolution are scarce ..

Yeah, that's one wrinkle. The other is RFK. I suppose if he endorses Trump that would be a problem for Harris and the Democrats. That said, I wonder how many of the people who say they are for RFK are low-information voters who just see the name Kennedy and go all gooey.
 
The far right can be seen on the side walk.
Everything your day consists of is delivered by the far right.
They defended America, built the railroads, and the Californian housing enjoyed by the tech companies.

When Trump and the GOP controlled the government they talked about a great infrastructure bill. After four years, nothing happened. Biden got one done immediately and it's paying off.
 
This is true, plus those situations are more likely to occur where abortion is banned.
What are you talking about? If the fetus is viable and you have to end the pregnancy, you do whatever you can to save the baby.

Organs outside of the body would have been seen on ultrasound. No one 'sets the baby aside'. :rolleyes:
 
It is your claim that it is all fixed. You need to support your claim, the burden is on you.

You are asking me to prove a negative—there is no bias—which is impossible, which as a skeptic, you surely must know. On the other hand, that women are disadvantaged—your claim—is demonstrable if true. So, the ball, by logical necessity, is in your court.
 
Last edited:
Wrong, you've acknowleged that DEI was needed because of biases and bigotry. Now you're claiming that it is no longer needed. The burden is yours to prove it.

Apparently it was needed before but now it's no longer needed because DEI is being used and that is bad.
 
I HATE the timing of the Prisoner Swap and the announcement for Supreme Court Reform.

It looks like things that Biden intended to use for maximum publicity for his run for 2nd Term.
 
I HATE the timing of the Prisoner Swap and the announcement for Supreme Court Reform.

It looks like things that Biden intended to use for maximum publicity for his run for 2nd Term.

It's perfect timing. It's keeping Trump out of the headlines.

Should it have been delayed or cancelled?
 
I HATE the timing of the Prisoner Swap and the announcement for Supreme Court Reform.

It looks like things that Biden intended to use for maximum publicity for his run for 2nd Term.

It's perfect timing. It's keeping Trump out of the headlines.

Should it have been delayed or cancelled?

The best time to get the prisoners out is as soon as possible. It should NOT be timed for electoral purposes, which would be gross behaviour and indeed one of the accusations made against Reagan.
 
The best time to get the prisoners out is as soon as possible. It should NOT be timed for electoral purposes, which would be gross behaviour and indeed one of the accusations made against Reagan.

I'm not going to disagree, but this begs the question of whether it was timed for electoral purposes or if that's just when it ended up. Without evidence of wrongdoing, it's a bit premature to assume wrongdoing.

The Supreme Court thing is obviously for election related purposes, of course, which is entirely understandable, given that Democrats would require a sufficient trifecta to make it happen.
 
Negotiations have been going on for 2 years involving a number of countries including |Russia.

Do you think those countries, especially Russia agreed to time it to benefit Biden's campaign?
 
I HATE the timing of the Prisoner Swap and the announcement for Supreme Court Reform.

It looks like things that Biden intended to use for maximum publicity for his run for 2nd Term.

Negotiations have been going on for 2 years involving a number of countries including |Russia.

Do you think those countries, especially Russia agreed to time it to benefit Biden's campaign?

Zag is way off on these. I don't see how either has anything to do with the election. It's not that Biden is above timing such a thing for political calculation. Only it really doesn't fit.

I think if anything, his decision not to run for a second term, frees him to do what he thinks is right.
 
Last edited:
Zag is way off on these. I don't see how either has anything to do with the election. It's not that Biden is above timing such a thing for political calculation. Only it really doesn't fit.

I think if anything, his decision not to run for a second term, frees him to do what he thinks is right.

sure. I might be completely off base on this.

I think I'm mostly pissed that Putin got everything he wanted by holding Americans hostage: he got Germany to release an assassin.
This is a flashing advertisement for future hitman that they can kill without consequences, as Putin can always arrest someone to trade them for.

Expect another round of Russia-ordered assassinations.

Of course, this is not sufficient reason to leave four people in the clutches of the Kremlin
 
sure. I might be completely off base on this.

I think I'm mostly pissed that Putin got everything he wanted by holding Americans hostage: he got Germany to release an assassin.
This is a flashing advertisement for future hitman that they can kill without consequences, as Putin can always arrest someone to trade them for.

Expect another round of Russia-ordered assassinations.

Of course, this is not sufficient reason to leave four people in the clutches of the Kremlin

Yeah, it's ugly. Anyway you look at this you have to conclude that all the choices are bad.
 
sure. I might be completely off base on this.

I think I'm mostly pissed that Putin got everything he wanted by holding Americans hostage: he got Germany to release an assassin.
This is a flashing advertisement for future hitman that they can kill without consequences, as Putin can always arrest someone to trade them for.

Expect another round of Russia-ordered assassinations.

Of course, this is not sufficient reason to leave four people in the clutches of the Kremlin

No, you just make sure the hitman never makes it to trial.
 
That may be what it means when you are actually the person doing the hiring. If you are not doing the hiring, the use of the term is likely to be seen as a racist shibboleth whether or not you mean it or acknowledge it. The assumption that a person of a certain color or ethnicity must by default be considered a DEI hire just plain is.
Moreover, along with the DEI label come accusations she's of below average intelligence and otherwise unqualified for the job. These racist smears have been echoed here.
Samson said:
This new woman has a low range IQ, possibly 120.
She was the only black woman in range for Biden.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom