• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

2018 mid-term election

Gillum was running on a $15 minimum wage and medicare for all. If he had run on more moderate Democratic positions, he might have won.

How long will you keep up with this Republican-lite philosophy?

This could very well be the reasons Democrats are losing. They aren't strong enough to be worth voting for many times.

For example Joe Donnelly of my state was pushing it with his "bold":rolleyes: renouncement of the "far left" socialists and people against the wall. Reeks of desperation and he very much wasted his 6 years. Indiana is basically a political ****hole of the north though.

$15 minimum wage and Medicare for all are only radical insofar as the average on the spectrum is pushing right.
 
Crazy response from judge who lost his election:

Linky.

Somebody on my Facebook feed shared that with the following (paraphrased)

This means one of two things.

A) These were offenders who needed to be in custody and he released potentially dangerous people just to spite the Left.

B) These offenders were not dangerous and he's basically admitted they never needed to be in custody in the first place.
 
...

ETA: don't get me wrong, I think the Senate is pretty much BS, but its not gerrymandering.
No, you can call it the outdated EC effect giving a less than democratic advantage to the alt-right.

One, shifting state populations has resulted in a serious problem.
Two, look what's happened because of it: an extreme minority has too much power for everyone's own good.
 
This is my view too. Muller's investigation is safe, and evidence of criminality will come to light and could remain in the spotlight.
If that were true, why was Trump in such a hurry to get rid of Sessions right after the election?

Could it be he no longer fears the Senate won't approve of his pick to replace Sessions and more importantly, Trump's no longer worried about the impact firing Sessions would have on the election?

From Whitaker's record coming out in the news today, I'd say that's going to be Trump's nominee and Trump and Whitaker have already met to discuss the meddlesome priest.
 
Last edited:
Somebody on my Facebook feed shared that with the following (paraphrased)

This means one of two things.

A) These were offenders who needed to be in custody and he released potentially dangerous people just to spite the Left.

B) These offenders were not dangerous and he's basically admitted they never needed to be in custody in the first place.

I am far from a legal expert but I'd imagine this would be a good way to get yourself disbarred, no?
 
Walker was defeated in Wisconsin, but Republicans aren't giving up:



Linky.

Yeah, they did that in North Carolina, too. The GOP there is very good at keeping hold of power, and pretty good when it comes to fearmongering and oppression, but not good at all when it comes to governing (and this includes doing anything that would *actually* keep the cis white residents safe, since that would require keeping them safe from other cis white people).

I'd say that doesn't bode well for Wisconsin government...
 
Gillum was running on a $15 minimum wage and medicare for all. If he had run on more moderate Democratic positions, he might have won.

If he had stopped waking up black everyday, he definitely would have won.

All DeSantis had was "I love Trump" and an assortment of racist dog whistles...which I guess are the same thing
 
The good news.

An estimated 113 million Americans voted in the midterm, up massively from the 2014 midterm and the highest voter turnout for a midterm election since 1966.

The bad news.

That still only added up to 49% of eligible voters.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/record-voter-turnout-in-2018-midterm-elections/

And the further bad news is that it will stay that way so long as right leaning politicians in power in right leaning states do everything they can to discourage and/or prevent people from voting.

If everyone in America had fair opportunity to vote (as we do in this country) and it was made easy for everyone to vote (also, as we do in this country) then your voter turnout would routinely hit 75%+ (like ours does)*. But the right knows what side their bread is buttered on; they will never allow this to happen because they know that the high turnout would put them in an almost permanent minority. Therefore, they will continue to gerrymander boundaries to their favour, and target those groups of people who are likely Democrat voters to put obstacles between them and the ballot box.


* NZ election turnout in MMP Era

1996 - 88.3%
1999 - 84.1%
2002 - 77.0%
2005 - 80.9%
2008 - 78.7%
2011 - 74.2%
2014 - 77.9%
2017 - 79.8%
 
Last edited:
I don't expect the new House Of Representatives to really help much with Trump, for a combination of multiple reasons.
•Most of the crap Trump's been doing has not gone through the HOR.
•The Senate will still not remove Trump even if he is impeached.
•Because of that, the HOR has no reason to bother impeaching.
•Investigations & subpoenas without impeachment have not even the potential for real-world results.
•Without that, they'll look like simple harassment, which is known to cause the "backfire effect".
•The real point is not anti-Trump measures but legislation, and the HOR can't pass & enact a bill alone.
•The party's "leaders" have a history of subservience & capitulation to Republicans & donors, not opposition.
•Its rank-&-file legislators include Republican wannabes who won't vote particularly progressively.

The main real reasons why last night's results are good news are more long-term.
•More potential voters in Florida from primarily Democrat/progressive groups
•Several anti-gerrymandering measures
•Continuation & acceleration of the erosion of the self-destructive Democrat myth of winning through "centrism"
•State legislatures & governorships moved R→D, too, not just Federal.
•Even a bill that gets shot down by the Senate/President can still promote an idea, to be acted on later.
•The Senate would expose itself as voting against things people want.
 
If that were true, why was Trump in such a hurry to get rid of Sessions right after the election?

Could it be he no longer fears the Senate won't approve of his pick to replace Sessions and more importantly, Trump's no longer worried about the impact firing Sessions would have on the election?

From Whitaker's record coming out in the news today, I'd say that's going to be Trump's nominee and Trump and Whitaker have already met to discuss the meddlesome priest.

Alternate theory: A replacement doesn't have to be confirmed by the Senate and it might be a strain to get Whitaker confirmed, even by these lap dogs. He'll leave Whitaker there long enough for him to do some damage to Mueller. He's got several appropriately dimwitted possible replacements in the wings but won't announce on them until Whitaker's fallen on his sword for the boss.
 
My biggest fear is that people who voted this Midterm for first time, (or for the first time in a long time) will be re-affirmed in their belief that voting doesn't change anything.
 
I don't know what you are talking about:

according to the Holy Book, being immune to snake venom is the best evidence that you are a True ChristianTM.
Beware of substitutes.

A Kentucky snake handling pastor much not have been a True Christian since he died from a rattler's bite in 2016. Darwin comes to mind.
 
That's ok but it kind of ignores any kind of shared features of the districts, rendering them useless. Might as well assign them via popular vote, as the representatives would be hard-pressed to represent the voters if they don't have any sort of shared goals or realities.



When only three of ten Representatives are from the party of the majority of voters, how well are those voters being represented?
 
When only three of ten Representatives are from the party of the majority of voters, how well are those voters being represented?

You're right, but this isn't a problem with the system of local representatives as much as a problem of changing the rules of the game to favour one party. That's why districts shouldn't be drawn by people who have to gain from them. You can't remove politics entirely from the process but you can at least minimise their influence.

I'm not against the idea of randomising, though, if only to try them for a while.
 


State law requires all of the information contained in the absentee voter file to be publicly accessible. If we did not provide this information to members of the public, we would be breaking the law,” Candice Broce, a spokesperson for Kemp’s current office.

Apparently you can go here to download the files going back to 2013.
 

Back
Top Bottom