• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

2000 Mules

The "fact checks" that I've seen so far on 2000 Mules strike me as nit-picky and weak. They don't deal with the heart of the evidence that the documentary presents.

Although traditional news outlets have ignored them, there've been a number of important discoveries relating to election fraud in the 2020 election. For example, a few months ago, an audit ordered by the Arizona Senate found evidence that 200,000 mail-in ballots had signature mismatches--i.e., the signature on the ballot did not match the signature on file. Biden "won" Arizona by just 11K votes. And, in Wisconsin, which Biden "won" by just 20K votes, a special counsel investigation found that 91 nursing homes had an astounding, unprecedented voter turnout rate of 95-100%. Investigators interviewed family members of many of the seniors in those nursing homes, and they repeatedly insisted that their loved ones were in no condition to vote and had not voted in years.

Similarly, a few weeks ago, important evidence of serious election fraud was uncovered in Georgia, thanks to a successful "open records" suit that forced Fulton County to release over 100 ballot scanner tapes. The tapes show that over 300,000 votes were not verified and, even worse, that over 100 ballot-scanner flashcards were not signed and were pulled prematurely from 12 different ballot scanners, in violation of the law. Pulling the flashcards prematurely and unsigned enabled them to be scanned in other ballot scanners undetected. Just the News has a detailed article on this important discovery. Keep in mind that Biden "won" Georgia by 12,000 votes. This evidence may explain the odd fact that Republicans won solid majorities in the Georgia legislature in the 2020 election (103 out of 141 House seats and 34 out of 56 Senate seats), yet somehow supposedly lost in the presidential voting.

I've produced a website that contains many articles on the evidence of serious election fraud in the 2020 election, but I can't provide the URL for this site because I haven't posted enough replies to qualify to do so.
 
Parsman said:
If my sides cease hurting from laughing, how many people giving how many reviews produced those outcomes? You don't think that just possibly DeSouza or one of his team might be trying to inflate the figures to get more attention for this dross he has the nerve to claim is a documentary movie?
Click to expand...

On various social media sites, there are those who insist that we "Watch the fil and open your eyes." Well, my response has been,

"I did and it is just a whole lot of fantasy driven speculation based on dubious "evidence." Exacyly what aspect in the film did you think, provided incontrovertible proof for the claims?"

The response is always some version of "Watch it...it's all there."

Me: "I did, there is nothing there. Tell me where the "absolute proof" is. "

Them: >>> crickets <<<

Leads me to believe a lot of thosse lauding the film have only seen the promos and rushes.
 
Last edited:
Parsman said:
If my sides cease hurting from laughing, how many people giving how many reviews produced those outcomes? You don't think that just possibly DeSouza or one of his team might be trying to inflate the figures to get more attention for this dross he has the nerve to claim is a documentary movie?
Click to expand...


Anything is possible. I'm not making any claims about the film personally; I haven't seen it.
 
mikegriffith1 said:
The "fact checks" that I've seen so far on 2000 Mules strike me as nit-picky and weak. They don't deal with the heart of the evidence that the documentary presents.

Although traditional news outlets have ignored them, there've been a number of important discoveries relating to election fraud in the 2020 election. For example, a few months ago, an audit ordered by the Arizona Senate found evidence that 200,000 mail-in ballots had signature mismatches--i.e., the signature on the ballot did not match the signature on file. Biden "won" Arizona by just 11K votes. And, in Wisconsin, which Biden "won" by just 20K votes, a special counsel investigation found that 91 nursing homes had an astounding, unprecedented voter turnout rate of 95-100%. Investigators interviewed family members of many of the seniors in those nursing homes, and they repeatedly insisted that their loved ones were in no condition to vote and had not voted in years.

Similarly, a few weeks ago, important evidence of serious election fraud was uncovered in Georgia, thanks to a successful "open records" suit that forced Fulton County to release over 100 ballot scanner tapes. The tapes show that over 300,000 votes were not verified and, even worse, that over 100 ballot-scanner flashcards were not signed and were pulled prematurely from 12 different ballot scanners, in violation of the law. Pulling the flashcards prematurely and unsigned enabled them to be scanned in other ballot scanners undetected. Just the News has a detailed article on this important discovery. Keep in mind that Biden "won" Georgia by 12,000 votes. This evidence may explain the odd fact that Republicans won solid majorities in the Georgia legislature in the 2020 election (103 out of 141 House seats and 34 out of 56 Senate seats), yet somehow supposedly lost in the presidential voting.

I've produced a website that contains many articles on the evidence of serious election fraud in the 2020 election, but I can't provide the URL for this site because I haven't posted enough replies to qualify to do so.
Click to expand...

Hooray, finally there will be evidence of a heavily coordinated, nationwide election fraud. Astonishing how the several thousands, maybe even hundreds of thousands have kept their mouth shut. Just you wait until the new member has racked up enough posts to post the link to his website with the "evidence".
 
So why was none of this evidence ever presented in Court setting?
Why did Rudy and the kraken had to lie and manufacture evidence?
And why isn't D'Souza bringing this to the FBI?
 
Bogative said:
True the Vote is claiming their source can be seen in multiple videos stuffing ballots at multiple drop boxes.

Earlier you asked why they haven't turned over the video evidence and why there are no investigations. True the Vote said they turned their findings over to the FBI and the state of Georgia has had an open investigation based off of their evidence since January.
Click to expand...

That probably never happened. A Trump supporters are known to be of a dishonest class of people. Are there any Americans who can support the claims of these Trump supporters?
 
Susheel said:
Wanna bet most of those reviewers also haven't?
Click to expand...


Possibly true. The reviews on RT say they are verified, meaning they purchased a ticket. But would it surprise anyone if the movie had a lot of positive audience reviews? I mean, I am certain most people who watch it have already drawn a conclusion.
 
EaglePuncher said:
Hooray, finally there will be evidence of a heavily coordinated, nationwide election fraud. Astonishing how the several thousands, maybe even hundreds of thousands have kept their mouth shut. Just you wait until the new member has racked up enough posts to post the link to his website with the "evidence".
Click to expand...

$20 the Arizona part says it is just Dr. Shiva’s nonsense, where he didn’t even have access to the ballots but compared them to signatures on deeds and such.

In a more recent study that Ayyadurai conducted outside of the scope of the “audit,” which Townsend and Wright cited, he claimed to have found a number of early ballots that were counted despite containing signatures that did not match other signatures from those voters.

However, Ayyadurai acknowledged that he didn’t have access to the signatures that election officials used for comparisons. Instead, he said he used examples of signatures for the 499 voters whose ballot affidavits his team examined that he found on deeds on the Maricopa County Recorder’s website.

Election officials and signature verification experts say people’s signatures can change over time. It’s unclear how recent the signatures that Ayyadurai used were, or whether anyone has independently verified that he matched deeds with the correct voters.
Click to expand...

https://www.azmirror.com/blog/here-...oena-to-maricopa-county-for-election-records/

This was in addition to a hot of other errors in another study where it is clear Dr. Shiva has no idea what he is talking about.
 
Last edited:
The funniest part is the part where they "found" "new" "evidence" "a few months" ago. (Which is of course a kind of a "9/11" situation, where the evil wrongdoers managed to pull off a massive crime without being caught but they left evidence literally everywhere, even years after the crime, most of it blatantly obvious also, so some upright citizens, without any experience in forensic analysis of course, could uncover it)
 
Last edited:
mikegriffith1 said:
The "fact checks" that I've seen so far on 2000 Mules strike me as nit-picky and weak. They don't deal with the heart of the evidence that the documentary presents.
<snippage of debunked garbage>.
Click to expand...
What "evidence" is that? Why wasn't it introduced in the scores of failed court challenges?
:rolleyes:
 
That there's an enthusiastic audience for this film should surprise no one. As Politifact reported:
More than a dozen public opinion surveys found that a majority of Americans overall believe the results of the 2020 election were legitimate. However, many of these polls also found that many Republicans continue to hold the view that the results were skewed by voter fraud, despite a lack of evidence. Politifact link
Click to expand...

Of course a lot of Republicans are going to say they believe trump was the real winner. I think polls show the number is around 50%. Below is a quote of three weeks ago from a local PBS news station in Pennsylvania:
With two weeks until Pennsylvania’s primary election, Republican candidates running for U.S. Senate and governor continue to sow doubts about the legitimacy of 2020’s presidential election, showing the extent to which the GOP campaign trail remains in thrall to former President Donald Trump’s extreme and baseless election claims. WHYY link
Click to expand...

You see posters here who will not state that, given all the investigations -- many conducted by Republican officials -- it's time to concede, yes the claims seem to have proven baseless. They waffle. This meme has already done a lot of damage to this nation -- many people outside the US are astonished at the way some Americans are behaving -- but the people who propagate this stuff don't care. They all say how much they love America -but they mean an 'imaginary' America, not the one that actually exists. They hate that one! ;)
 
So what 2000 Mules is saying that the vote that got dozens of Republicans elected was rigged.
I assume that the Republicans in the districts in question are going to step down, now that they have seen the evidence.
 
The felonious convicted campaign fraudster produced a film to gull and grift credulous MAGA-nitwits.

Smells like Dinesh.
 
mikegriffith1 said:
I've produced a website that contains many articles on the evidence of serious election fraud in the 2020 election, but I can't provide the URL for this site because I haven't posted enough replies to qualify to do so.
Click to expand...

Write it out thusly: mywebsitedotcom, or mywebsite dot com, or something like that with the word "dot" instead of the actual dot. A forum member can then link to it in reply. If we're feeling nice.
 
The Great Zaganza said:
So what 2000 Mules is saying that the vote that got dozens of Republicans elected was rigged.
I assume that the Republicans in the districts in question are going to step down, now that they have seen the evidence.
Click to expand...


Obviously you shouldn't rig the election at every.level...too suspicious. Best to keep eyes on the prize.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom