It's like driving past a dog with a broken leg on the side of the road. You just can't without wanting to do something. All right, one last chance for education, and then you're done.
First, take a look at the significant digits in the measurement. We have 2.1 and 2.3. Two significant digits. This means a minimum error of +/- 0.1 is implicit in the measurement itself. So it is possible that both collapses were identical, registering 2.2, but we measured 2.3 and 2.1 due to random error. This would be a valid explanation no matter what we were measuring, be it shaking intensity, length, distance, mass, or the number of people remaining in the Truth Movement.
Next, read this. It tells you how Richter magnitude is actually calculated. Marvel at how inexact the process is.
Then click below:
Do you also understand that chaotic events, like collapses coupling to the ground, don't always behave exactly the same way each time? I explained this to you before.
Next, what do you make of the fact that the impacts were also 0.2 MR apart (WTC 1 0.9, WTC 2 0.7)? And that the lesser of the two was WTC 2 in both impact and collapse? Vaguely possible systematic error, maybe terrain effect, that's what you should make of it, though I imagine you have some fantastic excuse for that as well.
And finally, the researchers at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, who computed those estimates, don't see anything suspicious about them at all. What does that tell you? Are you a million times smarter than they are, despite being off by a factor of five in your initial boasts just two days ago?
Learning is not easy. Otherwise, everyone would do it. Give it a try.
First, take a look at the significant digits in the measurement. We have 2.1 and 2.3. Two significant digits. This means a minimum error of +/- 0.1 is implicit in the measurement itself. So it is possible that both collapses were identical, registering 2.2, but we measured 2.3 and 2.1 due to random error. This would be a valid explanation no matter what we were measuring, be it shaking intensity, length, distance, mass, or the number of people remaining in the Truth Movement.
Next, read this. It tells you how Richter magnitude is actually calculated. Marvel at how inexact the process is.
Then click below:
Do you also understand that chaotic events, like collapses coupling to the ground, don't always behave exactly the same way each time? I explained this to you before.
Next, what do you make of the fact that the impacts were also 0.2 MR apart (WTC 1 0.9, WTC 2 0.7)? And that the lesser of the two was WTC 2 in both impact and collapse? Vaguely possible systematic error, maybe terrain effect, that's what you should make of it, though I imagine you have some fantastic excuse for that as well.
And finally, the researchers at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, who computed those estimates, don't see anything suspicious about them at all. What does that tell you? Are you a million times smarter than they are, despite being off by a factor of five in your initial boasts just two days ago?
Learning is not easy. Otherwise, everyone would do it. Give it a try.
Last edited:
