Mackey - I believe we've seen worse fires than were in either tower or WTC7 inside the same complex. The structure directly across the street from WTC7 was an inferno. It didn't collapse, nor did it have the same reading on the thermal photo weeks later.
You believe incorrectly.
The structure you're referring to is WTC 6, which experienced massive internal collapse. The only reason it didn't
totally collapse is because it was a much shorter building -- the gravitational energy per square foot was roughly fifty times lower.
We've all discussed this for years. Please, I beg you, try to educate yourself before trying to lecture all of us. You bring
nothing new.
I'm always amazed that there are still those debating this issue that don't understand that thermite can be used for demolition - specifically cutting core columns. Nano-thermite in an aerogel form can be sprayed on. Would make a steel beam look exactly like that one they found in WTC7. Swiss cheese.
Total balderdash. It has never been used for demolition. Problems in using for demolition would be severe and have not been evaluated, never mind refined to practice. Spraying it on would be about the dumbest way of causing a demoltion imaginable, and as explained above, might not even work.
And the "Swiss Cheese," as we've told so many people I can't even believe it, is evidence against thermite. Thermite temperatures would have destroyed the eutectic completely. A "Swiss Cheesed" structural element that failed because of "Swiss Cheesing" would have
fractured, not just had holes put into it, so that steel was not anywhere near its structural limit at any time before, during, or after the "Swiss Cheesing" took place.
I repeat my question, since you failed to answer before: Who told you this? Why did you choose to believe them? This is the only thing I'm interested in from you at this point -- you are a font of error where science is concerned.
