1 in 5 Young Adults Have Personality Disorder, Study Finds

Raptor Witness

Thinker
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
192
[1 in 5 Young Adults Have Personality Disorder, Study Finds] - Fox News Tuesday, December 02, 2008

CHICAGO — Almost one in five young American adults has a personality disorder that interferes with everyday life, and even more abuse alcohol or drugs, researchers reported Monday in the most extensive study of its kind.

The disorders include problems such as obsessive or compulsive tendencies and anti-social behavior that can sometimes lead to violence. The study also found that fewer than 25 percent of college-aged Americans with mental problems get treatment.

One expert said personality disorders may be overdiagnosed. But others said the results were not surprising since previous, less rigorous evidence has suggested mental problems are common on college campuses and elsewhere.

Experts praised the study's scope — face-to-face interviews about numerous disorders with more than 5,000 young people ages 19 to 25 — and said it spotlights a problem college administrators need to address.

Study co-author Dr. Mark Olfson of Columbia University and New York State Psychiatric Institute called the widespread lack of treatment particularly worrisome. He said it should alert not only "students and parents, but also deans and people who run college mental health services about the need to extend access to treatment."

Counting substance abuse, the study found that nearly half of young people surveyed have some sort of psychiatric condition, including students and non-students ... cont. at link above.
----------------------------------------------------------------

I sincerely wonder if it every dawned on the psychiatric community, who seem to think a good percentage of us are "ill," that it is perhaps their ignorance of genetics that is the real problem. The human family is as diverse as the stars, for good reason. It's called SURVIVAL. ;)
 
It's only because the idea of what constitutes normal has become so narrow and rigidly defined, that normality is actually in danger of becoming abnormality. The normal are now a minority, making normality fall outside the norm.

That'll put a crimp in your cornflakes.
 
One expert said personality disorders may be overdiagnosed.


No. Really?

I wonder if 1 in 5 psychologists have a sailboat which needs paying for which, in my opinion, might also go a long way in explaining the sudden increase in personality disorder diagnoses.
 
Last edited:
Only 1 in 5? That can't be right. One standard deviation covers 68% of the population, meaning about 1 in 3 people have a mental health problem. Of the other two, one has heart disease and the other cancer.

Health appears to be becoming as fleeting as happiness.
 
Doctors and public heath organizations want as many people labeled "mentally ill" as possible for the money and political power that comes from treating them.

Funny how they all seem to have their own weird anxieties and sexual deviance. Who would guess that they'd want young boys to come out as gay and need their counseling services....
 
Two silly things from here

CHICAGO — Almost one in five young American adults has a personality disorder that interferes with everyday life, and even more abuse alcohol or drugs, researchers reported Monday in the most extensive study of its kind.
(snip)
Experts praised the study's scope — face-to-face interviews about numerous disorders with more than 5,000 young people ages 19 to 25 — and said it spotlights a problem college administrators need to address.

Let's say that this is true, that 1 in 5 youth have a disorder. Can they translate that number directly to college students? And maybe college students need to have a disorder, since they list obsessive and anti-social behaviour as a disorder. When I was in school, that was just called "studying".

But wait! There's more!

Personality disorders were the second most common problem behind drug or alcohol abuse as a single category.

What? People aged 19 to 25 abuse alcohol? I'm shocked. Truly amazed, that I am.
 
I sincerely wonder if it every dawned on the psychiatric community, who seem to think a good percentage of us are "ill," that it is perhaps their ignorance of genetics that is the real problem. The human family is as diverse as the stars, for good reason. It's called SURVIVAL. ;)

So? There is such a thing as genetic diseases. One man's genetic adaptation is another man's disease. If something causes distress and/or harm's ones well-being, (and is not "normal" although that seems like an arbitrary distinction, but I suppose psychologists can't expect to be superheros) then it's a disease.
 
Last edited:
Do you think the internet has something to do with this? I know I've joined web sites recently and gotten slammed for not liking Angelina Jolie's movie for example. The women come out with claws and daggers. I could see if I had been ragging on their favorite celebrity but I didn't say too much. The vitriol was palatable. I see this often on websites.

Quite a few people on this one seem really seriously mentally ill. (I'm sure a few would say that about me as well! LOL) But do you think that this whole "anonymous culture" has sort of created a split in people's personalities that upon close investigation is easy to see and diagnose? We have the angry young man online and then the normal guy in real lfe, but if a conversation that's been discussed online comes up the person rants?
 
Mental illness is probably a myth.
This is a letter I sent to Kelly Brewington, a journalist who wrote an article on this matter on the Baltimore Sun:

Dear Mrs. Brewington,
I have just read your article on the Baltimore Sun:
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/health/bal-te.mental02dec02,0,3163019.story.
I think you sould have a look at the following 2
videos:





Thanks and regards..

True to some extent. Though several conditions are thought to have possible genetic components, such as some anxiety disorders, and mood disorders like bipolar, and also, some physical problems can bring on psychological symptoms, such as when people can feel anxious when they have hypoglycemia or an over-active thyroid, it can be argued that to a large extent, the word "illness" is a misdescription, since the problem often isn't organic - people can be helped by changing their thinking patterns, learning relaxation techniques and so on.

It's quite probable that many children have been diagnosed as having ADHD and medicated, when all they really needed was a bit of discipline, more stimulating classes, someone to talk over their problems with them, or something else that would have meant there was no need for them to be medicated.

I think drugs are often seen as the cheaper and easy option, when in fact the right kind of therapy would achieve much better long-term results.

See this article, for instance: Overmedication of Children 'Troubling,' Say Experts (Subtitled Psychotropic drugs particularly overused for kids in group homes.

The views of the man on the video I viewed are a bit extreme though. For instance, he says if someone was on a desert island alone, they couldn't be diagnosed with a mental illness because what they did wouldn't be important since they weren't socially interacting with people. A mental problem could be severely debilitating for them regardless, such as if they were severely depressed so they couldn't be bothered to look for food and fresh water and died as a result, or if they were scared of bugs.

Still, he makes a good point in highlighting the problem of over-medication of people who really need other kinds of help.
 
Do you think the internet has something to do with this? I know I've joined web sites recently and gotten slammed for not liking Angelina Jolie's movie for example. The women come out with claws and daggers. I could see if I had been ragging on their favorite celebrity but I didn't say too much. The vitriol was palatable. I see this often on websites.

Quite a few people on this one seem really seriously mentally ill. (I'm sure a few would say that about me as well! LOL) But do you think that this whole "anonymous culture" has sort of created a split in people's personalities that upon close investigation is easy to see and diagnose? We have the angry young man online and then the normal guy in real lfe, but if a conversation that's been discussed online comes up the person rants?

Oh, perhaps this is what you're talking about: Flamer Personality Disorder. :D

I think people often behave worse on the Internet than they would face-to-face, partly because they can't see the reactions of the other person which might caution them to speak less harshly if they looked upset; partly because the other person can't interrupt partway through something they say so they can say a lot more than they'd say face-to-face before they were stopped, and for other reasons.
 
Wow that was freaking scarey to read. Am I the only one who's thought "Sheesh I've sorta done that a few times......." Internet is a not a good thing. LOL I think people talk online and you are right, its not the same way they talk to people in real life, perhaps its creating a bleed over problem.
 
Oh, perhaps this is what you're talking about: Flamer Personality Disorder. :D

I think people often behave worse on the Internet than they would face-to-face, partly because they can't see the reactions of the other person which might caution them to speak less harshly if they looked upset; partly because the other person can't interrupt partway through something they say so they can say a lot more than they'd say face-to-face before they were stopped, and for other reasons.

Over on TV Tropes, we call this the Greater Internet F***wad Theory, or GIFT. See http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/GIFT for more detailed explanation (caution: language is in PG to PG-13 territory).
 
But do you think that this whole "anonymous culture" has sort of created a split in people's personalities that upon close investigation is easy to see and diagnose?
It's not a split in personality. Very often you'll find that the behavior does appear at home. At least thats the case with me.
I sincerely wonder if it every dawned on the psychiatric community, who seem to think a good percentage of us are "ill," that it is perhaps their ignorance of genetics that is the real problem. The human family is as diverse as the stars, for good reason. It's called SURVIVAL.
Fine then what are we trying to survive from? It's a vestigial effect that has utterly no relevance nowadays that hinders people's ability to go through with a normal life.
 
Last edited:
Let's see....we don't have to fight lions or bears anymore unless we want to. Some of actually seek fighting lions and bears for the "thrill," and some think that's missing from our lives now.

There are a lot of us. So many, we can't form the close bonds in small, tight-knit communities we used to have to form a few thousand years ago to survive. We don't know each other, and that's scary. There's too damned many of us to know anymore.

We don't work the way we used to. We sit a lot. We ride a lot. We mostly don't farm, don't hunt, or even have to get our own water.

We end up with a lot of repressed hostility, anxiety, confusion...we have too many toys, too many things to plug in and program and pay for. We have too many of us to compete with, to the point the competition stops centering around who does the best job, but silly things like who looks better, speaks better, or knows the right people. We don't know how to get what we want, and half the time, we don't even know what we want or why we even want it.




Who would all this, and more, not make a little crazy?
 
CCHR linked in Matteo's video is a front organization for the Church of Scientology.

The Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR; also sometimes known as the Citizens Committee on Human Rights) is an advocacy group established in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and psychiatrist Thomas Szasz.[citation needed] The group promotes several video campaigns which support views against psychiatry. CCHR describes psychiatrists and psychologists as "Professional Rapists, Perverts and Pedophiles".[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_Commission_on_Human_Rights

The Church of Scientology is usually somewhere nearby whenever mental illness is denied. They prey on people who gather where ignorance is the norm.

The idea that interwaff suggested about political power is laughable. There is a severe shortage of doctors, and mentally ill people have about as much political influence as an atheist.
 
Brain imaging is increasingly applied in psychiatry, both for clinical evaluation and as a research tool. Computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have documented that structural brain abnormalities occur in some types of psychiatric patients, particularly those who suffer from schizophrenia. Dynamic imaging techniques such as single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) have documented decreased temporoparietal activity in Alzheimer’s disease, hypofrontality in schizophrenia, and a variety of abnormalities in affective and anxiety disorders. These techniques promise to teach us a great deal about the underlying neural mechanisms in mental illness.

http://arjournals.annualreviews.org....39.020188.002003?cookieSet=1&journalCode=med

Scientology is a lie and promotes lies.
 
All the world is mad save me and thee. And even thee's a little queer!
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom