1,600 verified architectural and engineering professionals

Marokkaan said:
NIST made a lot of faults in their reports, and even their former chief, says it. So what!!!
Click to expand...

But the ultimate result of their investigation, that fire and damage made the buildings collapse, is NOT one of those mistakes, even according to their former chief.

So. Those other mistakes could be discussed on an engineering or scientific forum perhaps, and not a conspiracy forum. Otherwise, SO WHAT?
 
Last edited:
We're not discussing heliocentrism. We're discussing who supports the NIST reports. You guys were asked to provide names a long time ago. You haven't done it yet.
 
We don't use our full names? Well... your parents certainly chose an odd name for you ergo. Don't you have a last name or are you in that small list of people known only by one name, like Madonna?

My full name is in my profile, why does it matter anyway?
 
ergo said:
That's right, RedWorm. So what.
Click to expand...

Yeah, so what?

15,000? BFD.

The entire world has access to AE911T, yes?

Let's see...~7 billion people, right?....

But, for the sake of arguing, let's say only 1/2 billion have access to the intertubes...

15,000 / 500,000,000 = 0.0030%

(!)

That's a whopping 3 one-thousandth of 1 percent.

I think you have a better chance of being attacked by a shark...in Denver.
 
Whaling is illegal in Oklahoma... Even so, ergo has a higher chance of being arrested for doing this... in Tulsa.
 
Last edited:
ergo said:
We're not discussing heliocentrism. We're discussing who supports the NIST reports. You guys were asked to provide names a long time ago. You haven't done it yet.
Click to expand...

You have been provided names. Jesus the list of contributors to the NIST report is a great start. They are pretty much the cream of the crop engineering-wise, but to you they're idiots or in on it.

Ad seriously. What if we decided to make the effort to contact every real structural engineer on Earth and, in spite of their laughter, convince them to personally contact ergo and express their opinion that fire and impact damage alone brought the WTC buildings down?

Are you seriously saying that you would give a crap? You already know you're in the minority right now, no matter what you actually say. How would us proving it change your opinion in the least? You're an irrational conspiracy theorist; your mind won't be changed by ANYTHING.
 
Last edited:
Nobody except, say, the ASCE, as I mentioned a page back.

But keep ignoring me and lying. Every time, you get a little more transparent.
 
ergo said:
.... However, perhaps you can answer the question for us: why, in the ten years following 9/11, have no structural building code changes been implemented specifically addressing this phenomenon of "progressive collapse"?
Click to expand...

They have;the Eurocodes now include for measures to limit the scope for what they term disproportionate structural collapse. I have mentioned this here many times.
 
Last edited:
twinstead said:
You have been provided names. Jesus the list of contributors to the NIST report is a great start. They are pretty much the cream of the crop engineering-wise, but to you they're idiots or in on it.

Ad seriously. What if we decided to make the effort to contact every real structural engineer on Earth and, in spite of their laughter, convince them to personally contact ergo and express their opinion that fire and impact damage alone brought the WTC buildings down?

Are you seriously saying that you would give a crap? You already know you're in the minority right now, no matter what you actually say.
Click to expand...
I have no doubt ergo, presented with the evidence he asked for, would start going something like "You expect me to believe-" or something else that dismisses the evidence out of hand and attacks the person who presented it.
 
TheRedWorm said:
Thank you for being the first truther to finally admit that the petition is totally worthless. Baby steps.
Click to expand...

Oh, I didn't say that. I said, "so what". That's what you were saying, right? "So what?"
 
ergo said:
We're not discussing heliocentrism. We're discussing who supports the NIST reports. You guys were asked to provide names a long time ago. You haven't done it yet.
Click to expand...

S. Shyman Sunder Sc. D
Richard Gann, PhD
William Grosshandler, Phd
HS Lew, PhD, PE
Richard Bukowski, PE
Fahim Sadek, PhD
John Gross, PhD, PE

et..etc..etc.....


all set?? We can move on?
 
000063 said:
I have no doubt ergo, presented with the evidence he asked for, would start going something like "You expect me to believe-" or something else that dismisses the evidence out of hand and attacks the person who presented it.
Click to expand...

Or move on to another "topic":rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom