1,600 verified architectural and engineering professionals

[EventHorizon]

Marokkaan is incredible. First he says this:

And jep another debunker who's interfering and goes on ignore.

Then follows it with this:

A normal debate, here on jref is impossible.

Ignoring people with counter arguments makes it impossible to have a normal debate? You don't say. But it doesn't stop there. Let's take a look at an example of a "normal debate" from Marokkaan:

Lol

Well, I'm convinced.


And then for good measure we have:

The only thing you can do, is show the facts and the opinions of expert.

Something that has been provided for him that he continually ignores instead relying on his list of interior designers or whatever it is. This guy is absolutely the king of irony.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

Oooh, I'm taking bets. I've got five bucks that says that Excaza can give a better explanation of peer review than you can. (Hint: Google It, is not the answer.)

One would think he would have been capable to add just a couple of his putative googled links to prove his point....how hard would that be?????
Apparently all he knows how to link to are youtubbie videos...

 

[Dave Rogers]

Wha'd I tell ya'...dos' NIST guys...just a bunch a' crap guys. Bush put 'im da' phone and tells dem', " Don't you NIST guys put dat' free fall in dat' report." But den' that high school guy, he come along and fool dat' Bush guy. And that's dat's where the real common sense comes in. 9/11...nuttin' dat' a little common sense can't tell ya'.

Scott, have you ever heard of Debunker Fatigue Syndrome?

Just asking.

Dave

 

[Scott Sommers]

Scott, have you ever heard of Debunker Fatigue Syndrome?

Just asking.

Dave

I've been there and back, as the Mod Squad used to say. I just can't believe there are people willing to do such things for attention. But there was that kid in Grade 3 who ate his boogers at lunch time...

 

[Foolmewunz]

And jep another debunker who's interfering and goes on ignore.

A normal debate, here on jref is impossible.

The only thing you can do, is show the facts and the opinions of expert.

Putting people on ignore is probably easier than showing us what you know about the peer review process. I'm honored to be in such august company as your previously announced ignorees.

 

[Scott Sommers]

Putting people on ignore is probably easier than showing us what you know about the peer review process. I'm honored to be in such august company as your previously announced ignorees.

Ahhhh....I got put on ignore. Man that hurts. Now I'll never know if Marokkaan will take my advice and stop making a jackass of himself. Like I said, stick with the nuclear bombs and holographic planes. This makes a lot more sense than when he starts talking about peer-review. At times like this, I miss Jammonious. At least he knows that he doesn't know anything. Is he still around? Maybe we could get him over here so he could post videos of planes crashing into the towers as evidence that no planes crashed into them.

 

[Scott Sommers]

Scott, have you ever heard of Debunker Fatigue Syndrome?

Just asking.

Dave

I love ya' Dave. Thanks for the kind thoughts.

 

[ergo]

Changes were made based on the NIST report

Actually the changes were almost entirely about fire safety and egress. Nothing about changing structural design to prevent "progressive collapse".

 

[ergo]

In this thread alone, there have been something like five or six instances of rebunking already debunked claims. And it goes on...

 

[Marokkaan]

In this thread alone, there have been something like five or six instances of rebunking already debunked claims. And it goes on...

and on and on.....

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

In this thread alone, there have been something like five or six instances of rebunking already debunked claims. And it goes on...

We keep correcting you. You keep being wrong.

It's a "circle of life" thing.

 

[Animal]

Now here's where you can take up the gauntlet, Ergo. You throw out a list of all the peer-reviewed papers by the TM (all none of them) and the self-published nonsense (all one of them), and we'll tear 'em apart for you. It's already been done by much better minds than my own. You can find the debunking of Jones and Griffin and Harrit in numerous threads.

So now it's your turn. You start working on that partial list. A dedicated researcher should be able to knock them down in a few months. So we'll see you in February?

On your mark? Get set? Go? (No, I mean that sincerely.... Go!)

ergo doing the troofer hand wave once again. <YAWN>

 

[DGM]

In this thread alone, there have been something like five or six instances of rebunking already debunked claims. And it goes on...

Let me try my hand at "proper debate".

I think I can answer this with.............LOL. (or should that be <facepalm>, I have trouble keeping that straight).

 

[Animal]

We keep correcting you. You jeep being wrong.

It's a "circle of life" thing.

And with troofers.....it is wash, rinse and repeat time after time after time.

 

[alienentity]

But but but you had me on ignore? LOL

By the way, does nist have peer reviewed reports yes or no?

Yes, they are peer-reviewed.

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

I've never said buildings can't collapse because of fire. I do think it highly unlikely steel frame buildings can completely collapse as we saw on that day.

Al-Qeada feels the same way. Which is why they used a 140 airliner traveling at 500 miles per hour and carrying tens of thousands of pounds of fuel instead of a couple guys with gas cans and matches.

Are you capable of understanding that fires caused in such a manner are extraordinary compared to the usual kind of fires one encounters in office buildings?

I mean 7 reached free fall speed.

You lie like a truther. I'm starting to suspect that it's a mental disease and you can't help it. Like a serial killer seeing a hooker walking down the street and reaching for his knife and duct-tape, you just can't suppress the urge.

What I took the time to describe, is someone who is being faced with evidence that is contradictory to his world view, and is responding with anger.

If reacting to events that way is causing you pain, then maybe you should stop?

 

[WildCat]

What Did and Did Not Cause Collapse of the WTC Twin Towers in New York Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE, vol. 134 (2008), in press. Zdenek P. Bazant, Jia-Liang Le, Frank R. Greening and David B. Benson

Why has NO TRUTHER been able to do anything like this? Why has NO ONE at A&E911Truth been able to PUBLISH in this journal? Why has Richard Gage not written one single whitepaper? Why is there NOT ONE single 9/11 Truth related paper / article in ANY of these:

Because frauds, charlatans, the mentally ill, and the incompetent generally don't publish in such journals.

 

[WildCat]

I'm sure somebody will past a competing body of published work from the 1600 truther experts soon.

...?

Right here:


That's it, the complete list!

 

[excaza]

Then you know NIST failed with their reports.

Ohno you dont know, thats why you are a debunker.

You dont even know how a peer reviewed process goes

Ok. Explain the process to me, since apparently I don't know how it goes despite reviewing AIAA papers. Be sure to include points explaining how and why the NIST reports do not follow this process despite being released multiple times in draft form and refined based on external inputs (including by your beloved high school teacher).

And in case I'm being too subtle, I will rephrase: Explain how the NIST report, probably one of the most visible papers in recent history, was not peer reviewed despite, by your own admission, being peer reviewed.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

In this thread alone, there have been something like five or six instances of rebunking already debunked claims. And it goes on...

And let you cannot list any of them