wtc2

I have just been watching Mr Rodriguez' 50 minute presentation at the 9/11 Truth Movement convention. (By the way, he's an excellent public speaker). Just after 33.30, he describes the impact on WTC2. What's interesting is what comes immediately after it: This reflects the New York Times...

I was watching the 9/11 Commision video presentation (aired on C-SPAN) that tracks the flight paths of the four planes, and I noticed that it portrays UA 175's flight over Staten Island as involving some very jerky manouvers. Around 9:01:35, the plane is above the Westerleigh neighborhood of...

Youtube video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAm3dMeosHU This video shows one of the Otis fighters which appears on the left of the screen in pursuit of Flight 175 as it crashes into WTC 2. Set the video to large screen and do a slow-motion on the video and you will see the fighter fly east...

This may seem like a puny detail, but the illustration in the NIST report and this one: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/World_Trade_Center_Building_Design_with_Floor_and_Elevator_Arrangment.svg does not mention any of the elevators going below the Plaza (Lobby?) level. Im...

I thought about making one thread where people can dump in what they think happened on 9/11. Because, you know, since the 9/11 Commission Report is flawed... and the NIST report is lacking in a couple subjects, as we now know... a thread that explain some things by citing sources would be...

At the present time there are THREE main theories that claim to explain the collapse of WTC 1 & 2: 1. The “official theory”: The collapse events were natural, gravitationally driven, processes that were brought on by localized damage caused by the aircraft impacts and subsequent fires. 2. Dr...

I have always heard this but have never seen a significance, the office was open after the power down and explosives would have been noticable. Also, if you notice there are a few spelling errors so I thought it could be a twoofer's lie. Also notice how he doesn't work on Tuesday and he puts...

At his thread: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=77137 Please address and respond accordingly you are in error: You have avoided my invite to respond 10 times now, to respond to the fact that the 'I' beams, angled cut, as pictured throughout this thread topic as...

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=5206&st=100 How crazy can this get? All the fellow LCF members are losing faith in him as well.

Why are the people in this video running before the south tower even starts to collapse? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xd8-QwwUaWE&NR This BBC reporter says "we had that big explosion, from much much lower.." when he is describing the south tower collapse...

Hi! I was wondering if anyone know of a laymans comparison, or discussion, between/about how the damage differed between the different WTC's that werent hit by airplanes? (In short, the CT-argument "WTC7 fell into its own footprint, why didn't that happen to WTC 5, 6 etc"). I've not come...

Having just finished watching "In Plane Sight" for the first time, I'm thinking that most of his crap has been thoroughly debunked or ridiculed (e.g. the "pod" theory). There is however one question that is raised in the video that I haven't seen an explanation to - white smoke coming from...

OK OCTs, have fun explaining the physics of this one. To my eyes, it looks like the plane has half-entered the building. The right wing tip is showing, and the rest of the wing is already inside. But it looks like the steel beams have magically healed! The gaping plane-shaped hole doesn't...

Christophera thinks this pic shows the concrete core of the south tower: http://amanzafar.no-ip.com/WTC/wtc41.JPG Is that the Millenium Hotel? If not, what building is that?

Hey, MM, welcome to the forum. I've used my NWO Invisibility CloakTM to read a few of your posts at LCF. You wrote a lengthy OP describing how WTC 1 and 2 were demolished with explosives, called "How Did They Do It?, Stealth C D at the W T C" in which you state, and and and and and Now...

IfxjBfQZ9qU Actually a (relatively*) valiant attempt at analysing some footage. Unfortunately for him, and inevitably, it has obvious fatal flaws. He predicts where the plane should be at the start of the footage by using a rate of descent (and speed) extrapolated from the last ~0.5 seconds...

Hi! Anyone know where this video came from? I've just come across the same but apparently with explosions added (?). Cheers, SLOB

The whole controlled demolition issue bores me to death with a littlebit of common sense and looking into the main arguments of the CT crowd. However: There´s a pretty good Video that shows how the outer columns of the South Tower are getting pulled inwards before and during the initial...

Alright so I got this "paper" of some sorts from a guy on another forum and it supposedly shows how the NIST report is incorrect. Honestly all I've seen is attempts to discredit the report by talking about how some of the scientists are related to the government, but I just want to make sure I...

It amazes me, that everytime I Google for information regarding 9/11, I keep finding stuff I have never seen before. Take the next image for example, taken from the South Tower :eek: But more amazing (to me that is, I have never seen this one before) is this video, starting just moments after...

When I was image Googling for WTC pictures yesterday, I came across -IIRC- a picture of a replica building of the Twin Towers. I thought that was in Vegas. I didn't look further then, but now I'm searching for it, but can't find it. So, was there a picture, which now has been hidden by the...

Several weeks ago this letter appeared in my local paper, THE WINDSOR STAR: More research needed on 9-11 building sites: As the shock and awe wears off, almost half of America now suspects U.S. government involvement in the 9-11 atrocities. Common sense is prevailing in the perception that...

Good article up on counterpunch.org. Twoofers will hate it for two reasons; Science still isn't on thier side. It's got "maths" in it. Twoofers don't like "maths". :( EDIT: Bleh, I've had the stickies hidden for so long, I forgot they were there. Reposting to the appropriate thread.

I've been wondering for a while what were to happen if the fires in the World Trade Center were able to be extinguished in time to prevent the collapse of both towers? Would it be possible for construction crews to repair the massive structural damage to the towers caused by the jets and fires...

I was very excited when I originally started watching this video. The proximity and sound quality was finally going to answer the sound of explosions issue. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5370762387415552903&q=bob+bri&hl=en But then when I got to 14:07 and realized it had been fast...

http://www.acebaker.com/KingdomCome/BlownToKingdomCome.html

How did they know they where extra devices? Did they see them? How did they know they were bombs? There was a lot of confussion on 9/11. When the federal building in Oklahoma was bombed, there were a lot of reports of a 2nd, 3rd even a 4th device discovered. It's just how people react when...

I've done some preliminary investigoogling but I can't seem to find a reference to an estimate of how fast the planes that hit the two WTC towers were travelling. Can anyone provide a reference? Thanks. It's the last bit of info I need to refute a troofer in a letter to my local paper.

someone posted this at 911 blogger, i hadnt heard this before. Lets see it debunked " Popular Mechanics, while mentioning that an engine from the South Tower airliner landed in the street, neglected to show an engine photo, engine street location, and engine positive identification. Just by...

I posted this in another thread, but I really would like to know what the nutters could possibly come up with next. Seriously. I mean they believe that WRT the towers: Nukes brought down the towers Holograms instead of planes Star Wars beam weapon Faster than freefall Directional nukes...