smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
Amen to that!Being trans is no longer an act of rebellion, if it's what your teachers are pushing on you. Fads and fashions move on. Let's hope this one is going the way of the wasp waist and the leg-o-mutton sleeve.
Amen to that!Being trans is no longer an act of rebellion, if it's what your teachers are pushing on you. Fads and fashions move on. Let's hope this one is going the way of the wasp waist and the leg-o-mutton sleeve.
If we could get a general agreement that transition is intended to be a treatment for a mental health issue, that would be a major shift.A recent US study using a retrospective matched cohort design that analyzed over 107k medical records from patients with a diagnoses of gender dysphoria found that "those undergoing surgery were at significantly higher risk for depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, and substance use disorders than those without surgery".
Of course this is not an RCT (but nor are any studies cited in support of the efficacy of gender-affirming treatment). The conclusions correctly use the term 'associated with' rather than 'causing' poorer mental health. However, when designs that cannot establish causation show apparent associations between medical transition and positive outcomes, the interpretation is always framed as causal. Interestingly the conclusions are still that medical transition is beneficial (because it affirms identity) and the results must be attributed to inadequate mental health support following surgery.
I don't remember if this was already shared upthread, but Mary Harrington coined a phrase you might enjoy.I have a gripe, and I'm going to impose it on all of you.
...now I have to *deselect* nudity being shown in the game while also being force-fed the notion that humans are Mr. Potato Head with plug and play parts available in any combination you can imagine.
From Newman vs Metropolitan Police employment tribunal
Minutes from LGTB+ community engagement group - SO15 (counter-terrorism) are keeping an eye on TERFs but haven't found any evidence of wrong-doing.
View attachment 59492
Wrong. There are many other news outlets the world over, including some that are centre left, who are not on board with TRAsWell, it shows that the whole damn thing is concocted by FOX News, mostly.
Wrong again. The vast majority on those pointed out by Emily's Cat are TIMs playing girly dressup to compete against womenMost of the applicable instances are cases where the person isn't even trans.
Wrong.It's basically just some loser prankster that wants to make a point. But the point isn't meaningful if there weren't losers trying to make a point.
You call it fearmongering, I call it a reasoned position leading to accurate prediction. Those in the UK and Europe in the 1930s who warned about Germany and predicted war within a decade were labelled as fearmongers too... how about now?The movement is growing primarily out of the fearmongering, itself, which came BEFORE the actual cases. The mass reporting/brainwashing push began in response to the fairly vague DoE changes, not actual cases.
This is utterly irrelevant. How rare does an injustice or a wrong have to be, before it becomes OK? In my worldview, if one single female athlete is denied selection for a team, or a promotion in rankings, or a playing contract on account of a male cosplaying as a woman, then that is wrong.Actual trans people that want to participate in sports are even more rare than trans people. Filter out people who aren't particularly good at it, and you're approaching near zero.
This is wrong. You are completely out of touch with sporting reality.The primary people that really need to be eliminated are the pranksters egged on by FOX. So let's at least be honest about it and not call out the trannies when it's really the pranksters that are the primary problem.
It does matter - they only have to be competitively superior to ONE woman, and that woman is pushed down the ladderThe way you hear FOX talk about it, you'd think that all trans people are superior athletes... that's not even close to the case
I don't even have a clue who that is. It's a side effect of not giving a crap about sports.And was "Lia" Thomas just a prankster? Because I don't think he was.
Why am I not surprisedI don't even have a clue who that is.
Then why are you even here making comments?It's a side effect of not giving a crap about sports
I'm responding to your questions.Then why are you even here making comments?
But why bother even doing that when you don't give a crap about it?I'm responding to your questions.
This is precisely the sort of hateful rhetoric which leads to policies like this:Burn the lot of them.
Dunno where you were back when trans rights became a cause célèbre in bascially all progressive spaces and activist groups, but it really did happen a while back.Most of my opinions on the matter (to the degree they exist at all) come from the fact that only one side of the political divide is even talking about the issue.
This is precisely the sort of hateful rhetoric which leads to policies like this:
![]()
Minnesota National Guard members receive email instructing those with gender dysphoria to voluntarily separate
The email to National Guard members lays out a timeline for service members who experience gender dysphoria to voluntarily separate from the military.www.mprnews.org
What evidence persuaded you that the average military member with gender dysphoria supports the "paedophile agenda" in their spare time?And I can entirely see why military organisations might not want these creeps and weirdos anywhere near them.
No. What led to policies like this was the new Administration's position that trans identity is a symptom of gender dysphoria, and that gender dysphoria is a mental health condition incompatible with military service.This is precisely the sort of hateful rhetoric which leads to policies like this:
![]()
Minnesota National Guard members receive email instructing those with gender dysphoria to voluntarily separate
The email to National Guard members lays out a timeline for service members who experience gender dysphoria to voluntarily separate from the military.www.mprnews.org
"Burn the lot of them" is hateful rhetoric directed toward people who rape and sexually assault babies and children... got it!This is precisely the sort of hateful rhetoric which leads to policies like this:
![]()
Minnesota National Guard members receive email instructing those with gender dysphoria to voluntarily separate
The email to National Guard members lays out a timeline for service members who experience gender dysphoria to voluntarily separate from the military.www.mprnews.org