• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.
Prominent Targeted Individual Len Ber hopes that he will become "a CDC Advisor on “Havana Syndrome” in the new administration."
His chances have probably improved immensely now that Trump has picked Dave Weldon to head the CDC:
Dave Weldon (Wikipedia)
During his time in Congress, Weldon raised concerns about the safety of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccines, as well as the safety of Gardasil, the vaccine that protects against the papillomavirus virus.
Len Ber believes that he has found nanobots in "a slide of dental anaesthetic with a drop of blood."
 
A new report about the 'syndrome' appeared over the Xmas holidays:
Senate Intelligence Committee criticizes CIA’s treatment of ‘Havana syndrome’ patients (CNN, Dec 27, 2024)
US Senate report finds CIA mishandled employee cases of Havana syndrome (TheGuardian, Dec 27, 2024)
CIA 'Greatly Complicated' Havana Syndrome Treatment: Senate (Newsweek, Dec 28/31, 2024)

I think that the logical absurdity of this never-ending quest for the illusive 'syndrome' is illustrated by these lines from the report:
Review of CIA's Efforts to Provide Facilitated Medical Care and Benefits for Individuals Affected by Anomalous Health Incidents (Select Committee on Intelligence, United States Senate, Dec 23, 2024)
Seven years after the first AHI reports in Havana, during which time the IC engaged in sustained intelligence collection and analysis efforts and medical personnel conducted various types of clinical research studies on AHI reporters, there remains no definitive answer to the question "what is an AHI?" However, there is now broad acknowledgement across the U.S. government, medical, and research communities that not all of the reported AHIs have the same cause - and that many reported AHIs are likely attributable to naturally occurring medical conditions, environmental exposures, or psycho-social factors.In sum, the absence of a clear case definition of AHIs, uncertainty surrounding the origin of AHIs, and CIA's evolving organizational position have greatly complicated CIA's ability to consistently and transparently facilitate medical care, provide compensation and other benefits, and communicate clearly about AHIs to the workforce.

The whole point of the term anomalous health incidents (AHI) is that the alleged syndrome consists of all kinds of symptoms bundled together because they don't correspond to any 'normal' medical condition. It's not a migraine, it's not a cold, it's not the flu, it's not vertigo, it's not anxiety, and it's not one of the many well-known vestibular conditions although all of those could become AHIs if they were accompanied by something perceived as unusual and experienced by somebody working abroad as a diplomat or a CIA agent; for instance, the sound of very loud and shrill crickets.

In other words, AHIs are defined as something that they're not, a negative: They are allegedly not one of all those more or less common or rare diseases that people come down with. But now, it is demanded that this negative be defined as a positive, as what it is instead of as what it is not; as an actual disease or illness, which has been attempted since 2016. As the CNN article puts it:
The mysterious illness (!) first emerged in late 2016, when a cluster of diplomats stationed in the Cuban capital of Havana began reporting symptoms consistent with head trauma, including dizziness and extreme headaches.
It has to be an illness, even though it obviously isn't. And I can say that it is obvious that it isn't because of what I highlighted in the quotation from the report because "many reported AHIs are" not merely "likely attributable to naturally occurring medical conditions, environmental exposures, or psycho-social factors." Many (and probably the vast majority) of the reported AHIs have actually been attributed to "naturally occurring medical conditions, environmental exposures, or psycho-social factors." There was nothing really anomalous about them. The only thing that was 'anomalous' was that the people who came down with them and sometimes their doctors, too, attributed them to a weird cause, to something other than what is known to cause the respective illnesses or medical conditions. That this happened isn't in and of itself all that 'anomalous', i.e. unusual. In ordinary everyday life people ascribe their ailments to all kinds of things that doctors know aren't the actual causes. Ask any doctor about the origin stories of diseases that they hear every day from their patients, some of them more colorful than others.

It is one of those things that the 'Havana syndrome' or Anomalous Health Incidents have in common with Unidentified Flying Object (nowadays Unidentified Aerial Phenomena): It is something that hasn't been explained! It is (apparently) neither a bird nor a plane nor Superman - even though it often is one of the two former if it isn't a weather balloon or the planets Venus or Jupiter.
But for whatever reason, people want to turn the lack of explanation into a positive identification: an alien vessel ('flying saucer'), a Chinese spy drone or whatever their favourite fantasies are. And in the case of the headaches caused by the sound of the Indies short-tailed crickets in Havana: a hostile supersonic and/or DEW weapon attack. 🦗🦗🦗 (I've really missed that particular emoji all these years!)

By the way, this paragraph from the CNN article reminded me of something:
Examples of insufficient care outlined in the report included patients who “experienced delayed, denied, or pre-conditioned care,” including “long wait times to access facilitated treatment options; were denied facilitated care by a CIA care adjudication board; perceived that their access to facilitated medical care was contingent on their willingness to participate in a NIH clinical research study.”'
Delay, deny, de...
The Guardian also wrote about this: Havana syndrome patients reportedly promised healthcare that never came (TheGuardian, Dec 30, 2024)
 
Last edited:
The 'syndrome' in pop culture
Jeffrey James Higgins: The Havana Syndrome (GoodReads)
When devotion and duty collide, FBI Agent Nathan Burke must uncover a global conspiracy to save his wife…and the nation.
FBI Agent Nathan Burke is in the middle of a high-stakes operation to dismantle a terrorist network when his world is turned upside down—his estranged wife, Abby, falls victim to the mysterious and debilitating Havana Syndrome. Determined to reconcile with her and find the responsible party, he teams up with his former academy classmate Meili Chan and CIA liaison Bashir Gemayel to launch a rogue investigation, putting his own job at risk.
As more American spies and diplomats fall prey to this unexplained phenomenon, and terrorist attacks increase at home and abroad, Nathan unearths evidence of high-energy weapons and a conspiracy that threatens the very fabric of national security.
It sounds like the kind of novel FBI and CIA agents, Targeted Individuals and MAGA conspiracy nuts will love. Based on the description, I fear that it's much too easy to predict the 'truth' that Nathan Burke is going to uncover:
With his allies falling one by one to mysterious attacks and with friend and foe seemingly indistinguishable, Nathan must stop the spread of the Havanna Syndrome and uncover the truth…or risk becoming its next victim.
Expected date of publication, June 17, 2025.
 
Interview with a brand new 'targeted' CIA agent and 'syndrome' victim, in the for the new year and the new president:
CIA Whistleblower Comes Forward. Government Gaslighting: When America's National Security Agencies Betray Their Own Operatives (Catherine Herridge reports on X, Dec 30, 2024 - 14:27 min.)

The interviewer is feeding the former agent questions as if it were Hannity or Tucker Carlson interviewing Trump.
She doesn't even ask her questions about how she could possibly know that a DEW was what 'hit' her when she got her symptoms:
- You were attacked?
- Yes.
- You were attacked by an energy weapon?
- Yes. A directed energy weapon. My ear started hurting. I started having vertigo, the room was spinning. My head started hurting, like, it hurts so badly. A ton of pain in my left ear. And my ears started ringing. And I thought I was going to pass out.
- (...)
I was serving in Africa, and I experienced an Anomalous Health Incident. In my home. On a Saturday night. And I heard a weird noise. It was a really weird sound that I will never, I'll never forget it. And after about a second or two, I felt it in my feet, kind of like the reverb from a speaker. I thought I heard a noise, a weird noise, and then I felt it.
- So what do you think the weapon looks like?
- I think that there are probably multiple weapons. I think that they are weapons that can be fit in backpack. Ones that can be fit in the trunks of cars. Ones that could be planted at a position with line of sight to people from across the street.
The most obvious question is never asked:
- It is interesting that you can imagine all sorts of weapons, but what makes you think that the symptoms that you describe, which are not uncommon in an anxiety attack or in vestibular problems, why do you think that your symptoms were caused by an attack with one of those multiple weapons that you imagine exist?

Like the syndrome sufferers from Havana, it was accompanied by a "really weird sound," but we don't hear any details about what the sound was like in her case - and unlike several of the cases in Havana (🦗 🦗 🦗), she also doesn't appear to have recorded the 'attack'.

And no follow-up questions are asked. Not even when she says:
- I believe the Russian G.R.U. came to my house late at night and took me off the battle field.
- Russian intelligence?
- Yes!
There is no further question, no, 'What on earth makes you think that your symptoms were caused by Russian intelligence agents?'

And once again, a letter from the authorities, in this case the Defense Department:
"We believe your experiences are real."
It is taken by herself as well as by the interviewer as confirmation that she is the victim of an attack by a hostile power, i.e. Russia.
The Republican House report accuses the Intelligence Community leadership, the CIA and the Director of National Intelligence of shaping a politically palatable conclusion.
This is the declassified interim report.

An NSA memo from 2014 is also shown, with a part of the text highlighted:
National Security Agency, October 16, 2014
The National Security Agency Confirms that there is intelligence confirmation from 2012 associating (!) the hostile country to which [redacted] traveled in the late 1990s with a high-powered microwave system weapon that may (!) have the ability to weaken, intimidate, or kill an enemy over time and without leaving evidence. The 2012 intelligence information indicated that this weapon is designed to bathe a target's living quarters in microwaves, causing numerous physical effects, including a damaged nervous system. The National Security Agency has no evidence that such a weapon, if it existed or if it was associated with the hostile country in the late 1990s, was or was not used against [redacted].
It is a memo that 'syndrome' lawyer Mark Zaid also likes to refer to and has shown a couple of times. In this case, the first highlighted part of the memo is also highlighted in the video on X and read aloud. The part at the bottom is highlighted by me. It is not read aloud, and it is hidden by the subtitles if you have them turned on.
Nobody will notice how the memo ends if they don't pause the video.
 
Robert Bartholomew writes about the new case of 'Havana syndrome' mentioned in post 2,346:
Whistleblower Alleges 'Havana Syndrome' Coverup (Psychology Today, Jan 7, 2024)
KEY POINTS
  • New claims by a CIA whistleblower about a "Havana syndrome" coverup likely have mundane origins.
  • Even seasoned journalists are not immune from the human tendency to cherry-pick information.
  • The most likely explanation for Havana syndrome remains a relabeling of medical conditions.
I hadn't noticed that the "post on the social media platform X has more than 6 million views in just one week."
This thread only has 316,000 views, and it's 7 years old.
 
And they just keep coming, probably because they hope that the Trump administration will side with them, which is not unlikely considering the role that Marc Rubio will play in the new administration.

New intelligence suggests ‘Havana Syndrome’ possibly caused by foreign weapon; overall assessment remains ‘very unlikely’ (CNN, Jan 10, 2025)
Not a bad article. It cites sources from both sides of the argument, e.g. Mark Lenzi, a 'syndrome' sufferer who insists that he is the victim of a Russian attack and accuses ODNI of covering up the alleged attack:
“This see-no-evil ridiculous assessment not only covers for Russia but proves the point of the recent House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) report.”
But it also presents many of the arguments against the idea that the 'syndrome' was caused by an attack using directed energy weapons:
But complicating matters for victims and analysts is the fact that not all of those reporting AHIs have the same set of symptoms — and the vast majority of cases have been explained by other causes, officials have previously said.
And it ends with this (more or less) conclusion:
The ODNI official fiercely pushed back on the notion that the intelligence community was pulling punches in its assessment.
“To me, integrity is doing what’s right and true even in the face of impossible pressures,” the official said, noting that many of those reporting anomalous health incidents, or AHIs, are friends and colleagues of the analysts trying to assess what happened to them.
“We follow the facts wherever they lead, and many of us were surprised by the results,” the official said. “We do not question the experience of our colleagues. Our analysis is focused only on considering foreign responsibility, and the intelligence does not link a foreign actor to these events. Indeed, it points away from their involvement. And analytic integrity is saying just that.”
It could have been clearer, but I think that foreign responsibility in this case means caused by some kind of weapon.

More:
The Consensus on Havana Syndrome Is Cracking (The Atlantic, Jan 10, 2025)
Most US spy agencies doubt Havana Syndrome caused by foreign foe, intelligence report says (Reuters, Jan 10, 2025)
US finds no 'Havana syndrome' link to foreign power, but 2 spy agencies say it's possible (AP News, Jan 10, 2025)
Biden Officials Say the Truth about Havana Syndrome Is Still Unknown (NYT, Jan 10, 2025)
2 U.S. spy agencies see foreign enemy in some 'Havana syndrome' attacks (WaPo, Jan 11, 2025)
US intelligence mostly rejects links between 'Havana Syndrome,' adversaries (VOA News, Jan 10, 2025)
US Finds No 'Havana Syndrome' Link to Foreign Powers, But Two Spy Agencies Say It's Possible (U.S. News & World Report, Jan 10, 2025)

A pretty good 45-second summary:
 
Last edited:
As mentioned in the Cuba thread, Biden just removed Cuba from the lest of countries supporting terrorism, but that won't last long even though Cuba should never have been on the list in the first place.
Trump CIA pick Ratcliffe faces Senate questions on politicized intelligence (Reuters, Jan 25, 2025)
He said on Wednesday he was confident the United States can counter Russia and China, pledged to look into whether U.S. personnel afflicted by "Havana Syndrome" ailments were targeted by an adversary's weapon and develop offensive cyber tools.
The Republican subcommittee is already convinced that CIA officials in Havana "were targeted by an adversary's weapon," i.e. Russian ray guns, so there can be little doubt what Trump's people will 'discover' once they 'look into' the syndrome.

Guys like Mark Zaid and Marc Polymeropoulos have been busy linking to the article in The Atlantic mentioned in the post above. A recent CBS article is also popular: South Florida Republicans slam Biden over Cuba terror list removal (CBS News Miami, Jan 14, 2025)
This is in spite of the fact that the consensus that it's highly unlikely that any attack took place isn't "cracking" (The Atlantic) at all and two U.S. spy agencies don't actually "see foreign enemy in some 'Havana syndrome' attacks" (WaPo, Jan 11, 2025).

On the contrary, the new report from the Intelligence Community was a confirmation of the ODNI report from March ´23, but I'll get back to what the new report actually says later.
 
Here we go again ...
First seen in a Catherine Herridge tweet on X, Jan 17, 2025.
Additional Prehearing Questions for John L. Ratcliffe - Upon his nomination to be Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (Select Committee on Intelligence - United States Senate)
Anomalous Health Incidents
QUESTION 51: Do you commit to taking a fresh look and an objective approach to the question of whether anomalous health incidents (AHIs) can be attributed to a foreign actor and deliberate external mechanism?
RATCLIFFE: Should I be confirmed as CIA director, I will ensure that, under my leadership, CIA will pursue this issue aggressively, objectively, and with total analytic integrity. I will also ensure that all Agency personnel are provided the care necessary to address health issues which result from any condition while in the performance of their duties.
Catherine Herridge is the former CBS journalist who interviewed the new CIA 'whistleblower' mentioned in post 2,346.

I assume that this means that all the previous intelligence reports will be discarded and that they will start anew and exclusively include witnesses like the ones at the House Subcommittee hearing in Mary 2024, i.e. guys like Greg Edgreen, Christo Grozev and Mark Zaid.
 
Robert Bartholomew:
There Is a Good Chance You Have "Havana Syndrome" - A new intelligence assessment finds a foreign actor "highly Unlikely" (Psychology Today, Jan 20, 2025)
* The U.S. Intelligence community believes that the "Havana Syndrome" symptoms are real, but have common causes
* In any given week, most people experience several symptoms of "Havana Syndrome"
* The panic over secret energy weapons targeting Americans is waning
(...)
Several years ago, a study in New Zealand led by health psychologist Keith Petrie at the University of Auckland asked 1,000 people to identify from a list any symptoms they had experienced over the previous week. The average person reported five. About 38 percent reported back pain, 36 percent noted fatigue, and 35 percent experienced headaches. Nearly 30 percent said they had trouble sleeping, while 15 percent had difficulty concentrating, and 13 percent reported memory problems. Roughly 8 percent noted nausea and dizziness.
These are many of the exact symptoms reported by Havana Syndrome patients!
"Havana Syndrome" was the result of an array of health complaints that became redefined under a new label in the wake of sensational media reports.

If we take a look again at the headlines cited in post 2,348, it's remarkable how off the mark many of them are:
New intelligence suggests ‘Havana Syndrome’ possibly caused by foreign weapon; overall assessment remains ‘very unlikely’ (CNN, Jan 10, 2025) True.
The Consensus on Havana Syndrome Is Cracking (The Atlantic, Jan 10, 2025) No, not really.
Most US spy agencies doubt Havana Syndrome caused by foreign foe, intelligence report says (Reuters, Jan 10, 2025) True.
US finds no 'Havana syndrome' link to foreign power, but 2 spy agencies say it's possible (AP News, Jan 10, 2025) True.
Biden Officials Say the Truth about Havana Syndrome Is Still Unknown (NYT, Jan 10, 2025) Very bad summary, but mostly true.
2 U.S. spy agencies see foreign enemy in some 'Havana syndrome' attacks (WaPo, Jan 11, 2025) No, not really.
US intelligence mostly rejects links between 'Havana Syndrome,' adversaries (VOA News, Jan 10, 2025) True.
US Finds No 'Havana Syndrome' Link to Foreign Powers, But Two Spy Agencies Say It's Possible (U.S. News & World Report, Jan 10, 2025)
Mostly true.

This is what the report actually said:
Updated Assessment of Anomalous Health Incidents, as of December 2024 (Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), Jan 10, 2025)
In line with the 2023 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), most of the IC continues to assess that it is "very unlikely" a foreign adversary is responsible for the events reported as possible anomalous health incidents (AHIs).
(...)
In judging that it is "very unlikely" that a foreign actor is responsible, five IC components place emphasis on sensitive intelligence reporting continuing to point away from foreign involvement in AHIs
(...)
In contrast, one IC component judges there is a "roughly even chance" a foreign actor has used a novel weapon or prototype device to harm a small, undetermined subset of the USG personnel or dependents who reported medical symptoms or sensory phenomena as AHIs. Another IC component judges there is a "roughly even chance" a foreign actor has developed a novel weapon or prototype device that could have harmed a small, undetermined subset of the USG personnel or dependents who reported medical symptoms or sensory phenomena as AHIs. However, this component continues to assess it is unlikely a foreign actor has deployed such a weapon in any events reported as possible AHIs. both of these IC components have low confidence in these judgments.

So of the two 'components' that disagree with the other five, one thinks there's a 50-50 chance that any kind of attack with a directed energy weapon has caused the syndrome, whereas the other one, like the majority of intelligence agencies, finds it unlikely that such an attack took place but thinks there's a 50-50 chance that a foreign adversary may have such a weapon.

All in all, this is basically a confirmation of the old ODNI report. It's an outright lie when WaPo claims that "2 U.S. spy agencies see foreign enemy in some 'Havana Syndrome' attacks." WaPo makes its bias conspicuous when it chooses to talk about 'Havana Syndrome' attacks!

About "Foreign Actors," the updated assessment says:
Five IC components assess it is "very unlikely," and one component judges that it is "unlikely." One IC component abstains.
About "Foreign Actor Capability":
Five IC components continue to assess it is "very unlikely" a foreign actor has a capability, such as a pulsed radiofrequency (RF) energy weapon or prototype device to cause the symptoms and sensory phenomena associated with event reported as possible AHIs.
And about "Medical Research":
The IC continues to assess that medical research that US personnel and dependents reporting possible AHIs do not have a consistent set of physical injuries, based on research published in 2024 from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) that reaffirms prior medical analysis. One component abstains.
 
Last edited:
The 'syndrome' in fiction
Havana Syndrome - An Audio Spy Thriller (StormFire Productions)
For fans of The Diplomat, The X-Files, and Where in the World is Carmen San Diego?
HAVANA SYNDROME is a groundbreaking new audio drama which follows the story of two siblings pulled unwillingly into the realm of global espionage when their sister goes AWOL from the CIA to track down the source of a mysterious sound which has plagued spies, diplomats, and military officers around the world.
Season 1, 10 episodes.
 
Peter Isackson in Fair Observer:
Outside the Box: Havana Syndrome and our Common Future with AI (Fair Observer, Jan 13, 2025)
I drew the chatbot’s attention to one paragraph whose conclusion produced what I can only qualify as a devastatingly comic effect. It cites the pleading of Mark Zaid, a national security lawyer representing a group of Havana Syndrome victims who persist in seeking to blame either a foreign government or the CIA itself for their complaints.
“For all the confidence U.S. intelligence agencies have expressed in dismissing most of the conspiratorial claims about Havana Syndrome, there is little reason to believe the controversy will end anytime soon. In his statement, Zaid called on the incoming Trump administration “to ensure the CIA can no longer lie to the public and instead require full disclosure of what the government knows.”
Talk about idealism! Expecting the Trump administration to expose lying and the CIA to disclose “what the government knows.” Only a lawyer could have a good reason to invent such fantasies.

Mark Zaid appears to have sided with Speaker of the House Mike Johnson when Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee Mike Turner was removed from his post for not 'bending the knee' to Trump.
 
Not the 'Havana syndrome', but it sounds to me as if this might be a case of MPI in Matanzas, Cuba:
No corren peligro los estudiantes intoxicados en Matanzas (Granma.cu, Jan 24, 2025)
Ingresados 35 estudiantes por inhalación de sustancia desconocida hasta el momento (+Fotos) (JuventudRebelde.cu, Jan 24, 2025)

Cuba is currently on edge after Trump appointed Marco Rubio to be Secretary of State and put Cuba back on the list of alleged sponsors of terrorism. The current army exercises in Cuba may have contributed to making students anxious.
The symptoms of adolescent students that were hospitalized in Matanzas started with a weird smell, and they feared that they had breathed in a poisonous gas, which sounds much like the Swedish MPI outbreak last year as mentioned in this thread.
The alleged "gas" (or "substance") in the new case is also "unknown."
 
The 35 high-school students in Matanzas are all back home at this point.
Based on the most recent report, it still sounds as if it may have been a case of MPI even though it's still referred to as poisoning:
De alta médica todos los estudiantes intoxicados en Matanzas (Granma.cu, Jan 25, 2025)
Upon arriving at the health center, the students, mostly from tenth grade, showed signs of irritability, shortness of breath, dizziness, headache and throat discomfort.The exact origin of the poisoning is still unknown.
(Google translate)

In 2022, the biggest Cuban disaster in recent years took place in Matanzas:
Matanzas oil storage facility explosion (Wikipedia)
It took several days to put out the fire, and in the meantime:
Local officials warned residents to wear facemasks and stay indoors to avoid the sulfur dioxide smoke. The smoke also contained nitrogen oxide, carbon monoxide and other poisonous substances with the risk of acid rain.
 
Last edited:
Back to the 'syndrome'.
Benjamin Radford writes about the recent reports:
Havana Syndrome Reports Support MSI Cause (Center for Inquiry, Jan 21, 2025)
The report noted that “CIA has struggled with messaging around AHIs as its organizational position evolved from the original ‘attack’ narrative–which CIA officials later said harmed the AHI population by leading people to believe that their disparate health conditions were attributable to a foreign adversary–to its current position, based on the March 2023 Intelligence Community Assessment, that it is ‘very unlikely’ that a foreign adversary is responsible for AHIs and that most AHls are likely the result of medical, social, and environmental factors. While the attack narrative began as a hypothesis asserted by AHI reporters and those who responded to the initial AHI reports, and then echoed by the media and senior leaders, CIA initially took several actions that cemented his framing and that continue to have ripple effects even now…. In 2021, officials from CIA’s AHI cell that was investigating AHIs said that they were charged with the task of overcoming the significant ‘anchoring and confirmation bias’ lingering from the early attack and subsequent TBI narratives and noted that this bias had affected the workforce and influenced and influenced congressional overseers and the general public.”
MSI = mass sociogenic illness
 
You have to be extremely biassed to summarize the recent reports like this:
Intelligence Agencies Nearing Consensus on Havana Syndrome Cause (Jan 16, 2025)
Washington, DC (WorkersCompensation.com) – More intelligence community agencies and individuals are coming to the consensus that Havana Syndrome may be the work of a foreign adversary.
That would be the 50-50 "consensus" of one "that Havana Syndrome may be the work of a foreign adversary" against the consensus of six others that it is unlikely or very unlikely that it is.
 
From an article about a BBC editor:
Raffi Berg: BBC Middle East editor exposed as CIA, Mossad collaborator (MROnline, Jan 28/MintPressNews Jan 3, 2025)
John Stockwell, former head of a CIA task force, explained on camera how his organization infiltrated media departments across the planet, establishing fake outlets and news agencies that worked to control global public opinion and spread false information demonizing Washington’s enemies. “I had propagandists all over the world,” he admitted, adding:
"We pumped dozens of stories about Cuban atrocities, Cuban rapists [to the media]… We ran [faked] photographs that made almost every newspaper in the country… We didn’t know of one single atrocity committed by the Cubans. It was pure, raw, false propaganda to create an illusion of communists eating babies for breakfast." This process continues to this day, as the CIA continues to promote dubious stories about so-called “Havana Syndrome” and Russia putting bounties on American soldiers in Afghanistan.
Cable networks routinely employ a wide range of former State Department or CIA officials as personalities and trusted experts. Former CIA director John Brennan is employed by NBC News and MSNBC, while his predecessor, Michael Hayden, can be seen on CNN. Top anchors such as Anderson Cooper and Tucker Carlson have their own connections to the agency.
 
Last edited:
The Matanzas hospitalizations of students that I mentioned in posts 354 and 355 and suspected of being a case of MPI weren't psychogenic after all - at least not all of them. The "throat discomfort" was real, and the substance causing it was discovered:
Identifican las causas de la afectación a estudiantes de Matanzas (JuventudRebelde.cu, Jan 29, 2025)
Causes of the damage to Matanzas students identified
According to information published by TV Yumurí, a student sprayed pepper spray on a teacher's motorcycle and caused the inhalation of the substance
(Google translate)
 
A little more about the Matanzas incident, this time from TV Yumurí (which I'd never heard about):
Identifican el origen del gas que afectó a estudiantes del pre José Luis Dubrocq de Matanzas (tvyumuri.cu, Jan 29, 2025)
The incident caused 35 affected students who inhaled the gas and caused vomiting, redness, dizziness and fainting last Friday in the city of Matanzas.
(...)
This aerosol contains capsaicin, a chemical substance extracted from chili peppers, designed to temporarily incapacitate a person. It causes inflammation of the mucous membranes of the nose, mouth, eyes, lungs and causes temporary blindness, tearing, burning and difficulty breathing.
(Google trranslate)

The closest I have come to something like this was when I was experimenting with adding different spices to popcorn. I tried adding chili powder and made the mistake of lifting the lid while I was breathing in. A very unpleasant feeling in the lungs.

When I was teaching classes of hotel receptionists at the Hotel and Restaurant School in Copenhagen in the ´80s, one of the girls had pepper spray in her handbag. She showed it to a colleague of mine who sprayed a little bit of it on the floor to test it. They had to leave the classroom for 30 minutes until every trace of it had gone.

Nowadays, a permit from the police is required for the possession of pepper spray. The permit is only issued to potential victims of stalking or violent attacks.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom