• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories

Trump Prosecution Memo

Ranb

Penultimate Amazing
Ranb
Joined
Jul 25, 2003
Messages
11,190
Location
WA USA
Legal experts create 186-page roadmap for Jack Smith 'to obtain and sustain a conviction' in Trump docs case

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-indictment-jack-smith-2660859716/
Writing for Above the Law, Andrew Weissmann, Ryan Goodman, Joyce Vance, Norman L. Eisen, Fred Wertheimer, Siven Watt, E. Danya Perry, Joshua Stanton and Joshua Kolb, stated that, based on what is already publicly known about the sensitive government documents that the former president took with him to Mar-a-Lago after his election loss — and his refusal to hand them over — there is already a solid enough case for a conviction.
Click to expand...

Here is the pdf file; https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-con...sified-documents-second-edition-june-2023.pdf

It's a heavy read. But I'm certain that the MAGA's will just hand wave it all away. Unless the powers that be never get around to indicting Trump for stealing classified documents.
 
Ranb said:
It's a heavy read. But I'm certain that the MAGA's will just hand wave it all away. Unless the powers that be never get around to indicting Trump for stealing classified documents.
Click to expand...

a lot of those guys have no idea what's going on. they start every sentence about him like "nobody is THAT dumb" without even realizing he's THAT dumb, then end with "oh yeah, if he's THAT dumb then why's he so rich"

he drew on a hurricane map with a sharpie. you forget all these things that happened, and there are a lot of them.
 
"It's 20XX, and legal experts detail how Trump is going to face legal consequences for his overt corruption and law breaking" is a template that is endlessly reusable.

Lucy has pulled this football out enough times. There's zero reason to get hopeful about this stuff unless we actually see an indictment, and even then it's still a long shot.
 
TurkeysGhost said:
"It's 20XX, and legal experts detail how Trump is going to face legal consequences for his overt corruption and law breaking" is a template that is endlessly reusable.

Lucy has pulled this football out enough times. There's zero reason to get hopeful about this stuff unless we actually see an indictment, and even then it's still a long shot.
Click to expand...

I believe that's what was being said about the NY case concerning the hush money to Stormy Daniels. And yet, here we are with Trump indicted on 34 felony charges.

We also heard that E. Jean Carroll would never win her civil lawsuit against Trump. But...she did.

Additionally, in Georgia, Fani Willis's request to the chief judge of the courthouse not to schedule in-person trials or hearings the weeks of Aug. 7 and 14 also signals something big is coming. NOT indicting Trump would not require such a request.


Lucy ain't as fast as she used to be with that football.
 
Reading 186 pages isn't much to do if the fate of the country depends on it.
 
Stacyhs said:
I believe that's what was being said about the NY case concerning the hush money to Stormy Daniels. And yet, here we are with Trump indicted on 34 felony charges.

We also heard that E. Jean Carroll would never win her civil lawsuit against Trump. But...she did.

Additionally, in Georgia, Fani Willis's request to the chief judge of the courthouse not to schedule in-person trials or hearings the weeks of Aug. 7 and 14 also signals something big is coming. NOT indicting Trump would not require such a request.


Lucy ain't as fast as she used to be with that football.
Click to expand...

Keep in mind that as many as 30 people are likely to be indicted in Georgia.
 
Stacyhs said:
I believe that's what was being said about the NY case concerning the hush money to Stormy Daniels. And yet, here we are with Trump indicted on 34 felony charges.

We also heard that E. Jean Carroll would never win her civil lawsuit against Trump. But...she did.

Additionally, in Georgia, Fani Willis's request to the chief judge of the courthouse not to schedule in-person trials or hearings the weeks of Aug. 7 and 14 also signals something big is coming. NOT indicting Trump would not require such a request.


Lucy ain't as fast as she used to be with that football.
Click to expand...

A civil suit and a long-shot improper use of campaign funds is pretty small potatoes.
 
i don't know about that. i think the e jean carroll case was significant. he lost a jury trial when his only defense was "guys, it's me, trump" which proves he'll have to put up a sensical legal defense if he wants to win, and the evidence against him is much stronger in some of these other cases.

the days of shooting someone on 5th avenue and getting away with it are over.
 
TurkeysGhost said:
A civil suit and a long-shot improper use of campaign funds is pretty small potatoes.
Click to expand...
They are in the grand scheme of things. Trump has (likely) committed much more serious crimes that he has to answer for.

But it shows that at least some prosecutors are now willing to challenge Trump, and that a Trump victory is no longer assured.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom