• You may find search is unavailable for a little while. Trying to fix a problem.

Time to play: Guess what this is!

kookbreaker

Evil Fokker
Joined
Aug 23, 2001
Messages
15,220
And why is it important.

Here's the picture. Let's hear from some troothers!

Scraps.jpg
 
I know they recovered wing tip fragments from the Pentagon suggesting that the tip of the wing clipped the ground just as it hit.

Could those be the fragments?
 
If you look at it long enough and squint your left eye while sticking a fork into your right eye while hopping up and down on one foot and clucking like a hen, you can clearly see...

3" rebar on 4' centers
 
oh, its metal alright.

Hint: It was not found at ground zero, but is relevant to 911 by its absence.
 
I'm guessing it's the remains of a plane crash. But not one that occurred on 9/11?
 
Pieces of the luggage of which of course there was none at any of the crashes. so if I am correct it must have been planted.
 
Remains of demolition charges?

Ding!

They are strips of copper used to brace cutting charges. These were all over the recent implosion of Philadelphia's civic center.

The copper is exactly the color shown. Pink, purple, and all. These strips were everywhere, covered by the plywood boxes that covered the charges, as well as scraps of cloth put over the charges. Oh, and did I mention the huge lengths of burnt detcord?

This is the stuff demoltion experts say would have been present had CD been used.
 
Ding!

They are strips of copper used to brace cutting charges. These were all over the recent implosion of Philadelphia's civic center.

The copper is exactly the color shown. Pink, purple, and all. These strips were everywhere, covered by the plywood boxes that covered the charges, as well as scraps of cloth put over the charges. Oh, and did I mention the huge lengths of burnt detcord?

This is the stuff demoltion experts say would have been present had CD been used.

I almost knew it! :p
 
Ding!

This is the stuff demoltion experts say would have been present had CD been used.

Well, yea, we know that, but most CTs simply waive their hands and mumble something about super secret high-tech instant beam severing substances that don't leave any residue.
 
Well, yea, we know that, but most CTs simply waive their hands and mumble something about super secret high-tech instant beam severing substances that don't leave any residue.

Actually I've heard at least one CTer put forward a theory that additional charges were used to destroy the detonators and other evidence of the main charges...:eye-poppi

-Gumboot
 
Actually I've heard at least one CTer put forward a theory that additional charges were used to destroy the detonators and other evidence of the main charges.
-Gumboot

And charges on the secondary charges to destroy evidence of those.

Don't you see? It's charges all the way down.
 
That's like the theory that WTC 7 had to be destroyed because it housed the control center for the destruction of WTC 1/2 ...

CT-theories have the same striking explanatory power as ID.
 
That is proof of thermite!

Of course it proves thermite, because if they had used explosives, we would have found these things. Since we know it was CD, they must, therefore, have used thermite!

It's scientific!
 
Most of the pieces look like the blade from my lawnmower. You mean my mower was used to bring down WTC7?
No wonder I couldn't find it in the garage!
 
But Willie Rodriguez is making a living out of touring the world telling everybody about explosions in the basement.:confused:
Does thermite make big explosions?
 
If you look at it long enough and squint your left eye while sticking a fork into your right eye while hopping up and down on one foot and clucking like a hen, you can clearly see...

3" rebar on 4' centers

Muhahahahahahahahahahaha!
 
If there was a tail section protruding out of the ground in that picture, I would finally be convinced it was flight 93 that crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.
 
I didn't guess it, but I can guess why they use copper. 'Cause it doesn't make sparks, striking steel.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
That's like the theory that WTC 7 had to be destroyed because it housed the control center for the destruction of WTC 1/2 ...

CT-theories have the same striking explanatory power as ID.
After watching 2 planes hit #1 & #2 who would look into WTC #7 for evidence of a control center?
 
So you're saying the bombs in the WTC blew those copper strips all the way to Philly?

Thankyou.[/cf]
 
More fun photos from the demolition site:

CopperDepositweb.jpg


As my friend who was on site states:

"The one shows the plasma deposited copper from cutting
charges placed opposite each other on the sides of the
beam. You can see the smoother, irregular melted look
of what oxy-acetylene torch cut steel looks like in
comparison to the cutting charge a the ends of the
cut."

CopperFragweb.jpg


He continues:

"This is what the plywood (3/4") sheathing covering the
charges looks like, complete with a copper fragment of
the charge protruding through it. The burnt spots are
from the ends of the charge where the explosive is
exposed. it shows just how contained the explosive is,
no mound of toothpicks here, even though the blast
blew the panel off the box. "

Plywood cover boxes and burnt detecord are all over the site.
 
Incidently, with regards to the first picture in my OP. That is the actual color of the copper having been exposed to the explosion. It is not the result of bad photo color work or JPG compression. It really is purple and pink(-ish).
 
I actually thought the original picture was dead electric eels, where their batteries leaked all over and discolored 'em. 'specially that one on the middle left, the one that looks like a sperm whale. Maybe that one was a sperm whale fetus?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom