• You may find search is unavailable for a little while. Trying to fix a problem.

Donald Trump

joebialek123456

New Blood
J
Joined
Jul 8, 2024
Messages
1
Last edited by a moderator:
I thoroughly despise Trump and all that stuff, but I didn't read much more of this than he would have. I can't quite put my finger on it, but it read oddly. I thought it might be machine generated, but it looks as if it wasn't. But if you want to write an op ed, I suggest you write your own. Tell us something new.
 
Thermal said:
Since the author of the article you linked is named Joe Bialek, and the OP here is handled "joebialek123456", maybe not plagiarized?
Click to expand...

Ah, did not notice that. My apologies to Mr. Bialek if true.

And thanks for bringing that to my attention.
 
Looking at Mr Bialek's past publications, we can see he's been beating the Trump drum for awhile; this post is just a rehash of a 2020 article he wrote for the Daily Independent.

He mostly writes from a lefty slant, which makes his opposition to abortion a bit surprising. He also appears to endorse the lab leak theory for Covid-19 and to be something of an anti-vaxxer, although that article was written in 2021.
 
A good vent is soothing for the soul. Though Biden named Trump as his Vice President at the "Big Boy" scripted press conference. I'm not sure how that will work but many Democrats contend that you should support Biden's decision. Biden/Trump 2024?
 
Last edited:
Norman Alexander said:
Wait, what??

ANOTHER seagull-OP Trump thread?

Do we have the bandwidth?
Click to expand...

They have the bandwidth, but this thread should be merged into one of the other Trump threads (probably the Trump Presidency one) just for the sake of keeping a clean uncluttered board, something I like.
 
dudalb said:
They have the bandwidth, but this thread should be merged into one of the other Trump threads (probably the Trump Presidency one) just for the sake of keeping a clean uncluttered board, something I like.
Click to expand...

No, I don't like someone coming in, creating a new thread for something that's been discussed in excruciating detail already, and having the thread/title merged with a longstanding previous one. Where does it stop? Let the thread die and fall off the front page.
 
Last edited:
It's normal to be prideful of an accomplishment. This letter to the Editor was well written for a rant against Trump. I would like to question the OP about how exactly Trump raised current consumer pricing (this should be good). The implication I'm getting from the letter is Trump called his corporate buddies during Biden's term and told them to raise prices? Is that an accurate assessment?
 
I, too, enjoy querying seagulls who join a forum, make one post, and log out never to be heard from again.
 
joebialek123456 said:
ETA: Darat - Article can be found here: https://www.mauinews.com/opinion/le...-four-years-to-get-it-done-and-didnt-deliver/
Click to expand...

Donald Trump did not fail at his job. That job was NOT being President of the USA. That job was being Putin's puppet. As a puppet, Trump did a very satisfactory job of inciting chaos in the USA, putting down the USA's Intel community in front of Putin, allowing a disease called COVID-19 to run-a-muck, and setting up a disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Trump was so good at his job that Putin is setting him up as a puppet for a second term in the US Presidency, and should Putin succeed, there will be no election in 2028, and I question if there will be a USA.
 
Nosi said:
Donald Trump did not fail at his job. That job was NOT being President of the USA. That job was being Putin's puppet.
Click to expand...

I don't disagree, but I think there is also a domestic role. Trump upstages literally everything and so distracts media attention away from what smarter sinister people are doing. I'm sure the architects of Project 2025 were very much counting on Trump to keep the spotlight on him and off them.
 
The Atheist said:
A letter to the editor is not an article.
Click to expand...

Spamming for attention isn't, either.

Does this guy think this is some Pulitzer Prize level **** and his career will take off if he plasters this all over the internet enough? A lot of little teenage blue-eyed groupies, free drugs, that kind of thing? I mean, it's OK, but no one is founding a religion over it.

*deep into week two, SeagullWatch '24 continues*
 
Thermal said:
Does this guy think this is some Pulitzer Prize level **** and his career will take off if he plasters this all over the internet enough? [/I]
Click to expand...

Probably not.

I'd say it's a naive attempt to put more sand in Trump's Vaseline, so good on him for that, but it's kinda late to point out that Trump is a ****.
 
Perhaps this belongs in R&P, or Psychology if we had such a subforum, but I am fascinated with the mentality of joining a forum, making a one-post spam thread, and immediately logging out, never to return.
 
Thermal said:
Perhaps this belongs in R&P, or Psychology if we had such a subforum, but I am fascinated with the mentality of joining a forum, making a one-post spam thread, and immediately logging out, never to return.
Click to expand...

It's very similar to when scammers text "hello" then when you reply that you don't know them they start asking questions. It's basically just a way to call attention to their site in hopes of running up the numbers of their own pet project.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom