AGW Conspiracy Theories

[DC]

I think the AGW Conspiracy theories that are spread around by people like Alex Jones, David Icke etc etc are the most dangerous Conspiracy theories ever.
Considering the huge danger AGW is posing on humanity, is it fair to say that they are the mmost dangerous of all Conspiracy theories?
or am i overestimating them?
I think their theories might cause people to doubt the science of AGW and with that the theories are directly responsible for a delay of appropriate respnse to a real problem. and might actually cost human life and endanger whole species of extinction.

even Vaccine/Authism which surely are also very very dangerous theories have not the potential to be as dangerous.

what do you think?

 

[bobwtfomg]

I agree entirely, but I would say that wouldn't I, being a shill for the NWO/illuminati/alien lizards/Marxist inspired disinformation campaign that's been infiltrating the scientific establishment for the last century, distorting the data and perpetuating the myth that CO2 absorbs IR radiation and acts as a greenhouse gas.

 

[1337m4n]

Well, solving the problems that would be caused by global warming is really up to those in the fields of science and technological research and development, and those people generally aren't swayed by woo and bad logic. Sure, common citizens can resolve to turn their lights off or use a little less toilet paper, but that only goes so far. Changing one person's mind isn't going to make much of a difference.

Whereas with vaccines, changing one person's mind is all it takes to kill that person and their children.

 

[DC]

Well, solving the problems that would be caused by global warming is really up to those in the fields of science and technological research and development, and those people generally aren't swayed by woo and bad logic. Sure, common citizens can resolve to turn their lights off or use a little less toilet paper, but that only goes so far. Changing one person's mind isn't going to make much of a difference.

Whereas with vaccines, changing one person's mind is all it takes to kill that person and their children.

i think thats wrong. i mean this problem will not simply be solved by others, its actually everyone, atleast in the so called "1st. World", that has to solve this problem. starting who we ellect or what we vote for. what cars we buy, how we use that car. what lights we use, how often we use them, which elecrtricity we buy, when you have a choice. what products we buy etc etc.
i am talking about solving the problem, not solving the qonsequneces of the problems. the consequences depend greatly on what we are doing today already.