• You may find search is unavailable for a little while. Trying to fix a problem.

ADAM HUGO, "...Because Of My Presence"

I think it’s more amazing that a self delusional retard like you can upload videos
 
Supernaturalbeing: You're not convincing anyone with the cloud video, especially since you admit that there isn't anything paranormal that occurs in it.

Let's get back to the lottery numbers! Can you or can you not predict them?
 
North Texas Paranormal Researchers has finally reached a verdict on my tape.
They will publish the results in May at their website. They told me they want another tape just to make sure before they test me for $10,000.
 
supernaturalbeing said:
North Texas Paranormal Researchers has finally reached a verdict on my tape.
They will publish the results in May at their website. They told me they want another tape just to make sure before they test me for $10,000.
Click to expand...

My grandpa taught me this trick when I was 5. Pick a cloud, any cloud and he'd make it disappear. Turns out that if you watch most any cloud for 10 minutes it will disappear.
 
Hey...

Is anyone still reading these posts...I can update the information on them, maybe some new evidence or something...
 
supernaturalbeing said:
Is anyone still reading these posts...I can update the information on them, maybe some new evidence or something...
Click to expand...

Three plus years. Wow.



Sorry, Adam. You screwed the pooch earlier this millenium when you were nowhere to be found to predict your lotto numbers. You had your chance.
 
GzuzKryzt said:
Three plus years. Wow.



Sorry, Adam. You screwed the pooch earlier this millenium when you were nowhere to be found to predict your lotto numbers. You had your chance.
Click to expand...

Oh, give the man another go, for his name alone if nothing else.

~ Matt
 
Looking at some of the back issues of their newsletter, I'm wondering just how "skeptical these North Texas Skeptics are. Among other things, they appear to fully endorse sCAM. I think their skepticism may be quite narrowly defined.


M.
 
Hey, Hey Look At Me! I still got nothing

supernaturalbeing said:
Is anyone still reading these posts...I can update the information on them, maybe some new evidence or something...
Click to expand...

Sorry, we've moved on to other deluded frauds, Now of course if you start posting wining lottery numbers here BEFORE the lottery happens you might get our interest back.

So until then Woo to you
 
Moochie said:
Looking at some of the back issues of their newsletter, I'm wondering just how "skeptical these North Texas Skeptics are. Among other things, they appear to fully endorse sCAM. I think their skepticism may be quite narrowly defined.


M.
Click to expand...
Do you have a link to the sCAM discussion? I looked at a couple of the newsletters and could not find anything.

Thanks,

CT
 
CriticalThanking said:
Do you have a link to the sCAM discussion? I looked at a couple of the newsletters and could not find anything.

Thanks,

CT
Click to expand...

I'll have to retract what I wrote since I can't find the page I recall seeing. It featured an ad for a sCAM shop opening up in town, and elsewhere what seemed like a pro-sCAM discussion. Maybe it was on a linked site and had nothing to do with NTS. Sorry.


M.
 
Moochie said:
I'll have to retract what I wrote since I can't find the page I recall seeing. It featured an ad for a sCAM shop opening up in town, and elsewhere what seemed like a pro-sCAM discussion. Maybe it was on a linked site and had nothing to do with NTS. Sorry.


M.
Click to expand...

That's what you get for wandering around the internet unprotected. :)
 
Audible Click said:
That's what you get for wandering around the internet unprotected. :)
Click to expand...

Heh heh, that's one of the reasons I visit the forum, for all the good-quality links. And then that link links to somewhere else, and on it goes. It's like that phenomenon of "losing time." :)


M.
 
the challenge

Hey,
I would apply again for the challenge but they said that they don't do cloud busting though.
 
supernaturalbeing said:
Hey,
I would apply again for the challenge but they said that they don't do cloud busting though.
Click to expand...

Well, be that as it may, can you please tell me, specifically, what your claim is? What, specifically, will you do, and how will we know you did it?
 
supernaturalbeing said:
I'm working on this task.
I've got a laptop now.
Got a good job.
Girlfriend.
Haven't been able to post for a while, I guess cause they're upgrading there computers.
I found about ten millions dollars worth of money they are giving away for paranormal stuff.
I was able to do 2 out of three numbers for the New York pick three for a week. That was a profit of $400 a day, buying one set of tickets.
Still got a while before I can setup and try again.
Adam
Click to expand...
Are (or were) these the facts, that inform you you are a supernatural being?
 
Last edited:
Retest

I'm going to retest but I need to figure something to do. They don't do the cloud busting. I'll have to think of something. How about...
the same thing with smoke and glass tubes....
I would stand behind a glass and if the smoke disappears then I win.
I guess the smoke would not have to disappear by itself to know it is paranormal.
 
supernaturalbeing said:
I'm going to retest but I need to figure something to do. They don't do the cloud busting. I'll have to think of something. How about...
the same thing with smoke and glass tubes....
I would stand behind a glass and if the smoke disappears then I win.
I guess the smoke would not have to disappear by itself to know it is paranormal.
Click to expand...

Adam, you might want to consider that your (nick)name is supernaturalbeing, but you don't actually are a supernatural being.

Good day and good luck in all your endeavours.
 
supernaturalbeing said:
I'm going to retest but I need to figure something to do. They don't do the cloud busting. I'll have to think of something. How about...
the same thing with smoke and glass tubes....
I would stand behind a glass and if the smoke disappears then I win.
I guess the smoke would not have to disappear by itself to know it is paranormal.
Click to expand...


assuming it disappears at all.

try putting a smoke alarm detector in the (sealed) glass tube.

if you can stop the alarm and still works on the same batteries when reintroduced to smoke, that might give you some data.....

however smoke is not water vapor, as in clouds.

How do make the comparison, vis a vis?
 
Last edited:
biomorph said:
assuming it disappears at all.

try putting a smoke alarm detector in the (sealed) glass tube.

if you can stop the alarm and still works on the same batteries when reintroduced to smoke, that might give you some data.....

however smoke is not water vapor, as in clouds.

How do make the comparison, vis a vis?
Click to expand...

Smoke disappears on its own. The airborne solid and liquid particles settle somewhere eventually. The gases should remain gases assuming the temperature and pressure are right and there are no nucleation sites.
 
UncaYimmy said:
Smoke disappears on its own. The airborne solid and liquid particles settle somewhere eventually. The gases should remain gases assuming the temperature and pressure are right and there are no nucleation sites.
Click to expand...

Yes it does, so we time how long that takes to settle to get a standard to work from, cut the time in half (or whatever) and applicant must beat time. several times even...

I can still see some sceneario with party smoke generator, an alarmclock, smoke alarm unit several 600mm clear perspex tubes, and a number of persons wearing breathing apparatus.

Sounds like that firefighters party I went to the other night........lol

I think the idea would be to have enough smoke, and not enough time for it to settle, perhaps.

I sorta thought along those lines after I posted.

what do you think UncaYimmy ?
 
biomorph said:
Yes it does, so we time how long that takes to settle to get a standard to work from, cut the time in half (or whatever) and applicant must beat time. several times even...

I can still see some sceneario with party smoke generator, an alarmclock, smoke alarm unit several 600mm clear perspex tubes, and a number of persons wearing breathing apparatus.

Sounds like that firefighters party I went to the other night........lol

I think the idea would be to have enough smoke, and not enough time for it to settle, perhaps.

I sorta thought along those lines after I posted.

what do you think UncaYimmy ?
Click to expand...

Honestly, I prefer not to come up with claims for people to make. From what I can gather he hasn't even tried to do it yet. It's hard to come up with a protocol without knowing the claim. And without the affidavits and press coverage, how do we know he actually thinks he can do it?

That said, you first need to decide when the smoke has cleared. It has to be self-evident, not an opinion. I'm assuming your smoke alarm is supposed to handle that, which brings up the issue of calibration. After that, how much data do you need to draw a baseline? What's the guarantee that you can reproduce the conditions?

Assuming you resolve all that, which you know the claimant is never gonna do, I say you present two containers in each trial and have him do his mini-cloud busting on just one within a set time period. Lather, rinse, repeat.
 
UncaYimmy said:
Honestly, I prefer not to come up with claims for people to make. From what I can gather he hasn't even tried to do it yet. It's hard to come up with a protocol without knowing the claim. And without the affidavits and press coverage, how do we know he actually thinks he can do it?
Click to expand...

true.

That said, you first need to decide when the smoke has cleared. It has to be self-evident, not an opinion. I'm assuming your smoke alarm is supposed to handle that, which brings up the issue of calibration.
Click to expand...


sure, I agree, calibration is probably a solveable issue tho, somehow....I admit to not having at the mo a calibration system already..lol


After that, how much data do you need to draw a baseline?
Click to expand...
no idea, perhaps not a lot.

What's the guarantee that you can reproduce the conditions?
Click to expand...

well, if testing smoke alarms isn't relatively reproducible, i dunno.

Assuming you resolve all that, which you know the claimant is never gonna do,
Click to expand...
possibly, I cant take you on faith tho, I'm sure you understand. However you are probably right.

I dunno what the claiment might do. "Never" is a big word in a small dictionary.
I say you present two containers in each trial and have him do his mini-cloud busting on just one within a set time period. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Click to expand...

I agree with you, i'm sorta trying to get him to self assess, not test.

If he can stop a basic smoke alarm in a simple way (vaguarities aside for the mo), hey, he's worth millions already, never mind the challange.

but yeh, perhaps i didn't ought to be encouraging fools to be fools..
 
biomorph said:
true.




sure, I agree, calibration is probably a solveable issue tho, somehow....I admit to not having at the mo a calibration system already..lol



no idea, perhaps not a lot.



well, if testing smoke alarms isn't relatively reproducible, i dunno.


possibly, I cant take you on faith tho, I'm sure you understand. However you are probably right.

I dunno what the claiment might do. "Never" is a big word in a small dictionary.


I agree with you, i'm sorta trying to get him to self assess, not test.

If he can stop a basic smoke alarm in a simple way (vaguarities aside for the mo), hey, he's worth millions already, never mind the challange.

but yeh, perhaps i didn't ought to be encouraging fools to be fools..
Click to expand...

supernaturalbeing said:
I'm going to retest but I need to figure something to do. They don't do the cloud busting. I'll have to think of something. How about...
the same thing with smoke and glass tubes....
I would stand behind a glass and if the smoke disappears then I win.
I guess the smoke would not have to disappear by itself to know it is paranormal.
Click to expand...

Dude never posted a thing about stopping smoke alarms.
He said he could stand behind glass and look at smoke on the other side of the glass untill it eventually dissipates.
Since this awesome feat could never be done by anyone else, he would get a million big ones.
That is his claim no stopping smoke alarms.
 
Brattus said:
Dude never posted a thing about stopping smoke alarms.
He said he could stand behind glass and look at smoke on the other side of the glass untill it eventually dissipates.
Since this awesome feat could never be done by anyone else, he would get a million big ones.
That is his claim no stopping smoke alarms.
Click to expand...

My understanding is that the alarm is just there to objectively measure whether or not the smoke disappears more quickly than if it just dissipates at a normal rate.

If he stops the smoke in one container, the alarm will (naturally) stop. Without something to objectively measure if the smoke has been "supernaturally" removed, you could end up with:

a: "Look, the smoke is gone."
b: "no it hasn't"

Norm
 
Brattus said:
Dude never posted a thing about stopping smoke alarms.
He said he could stand behind glass and look at smoke on the other side of the glass untill it eventually dissipates.
Since this awesome feat could never be done by anyone else, he would get a million big ones.
That is his claim no stopping smoke alarms.
Click to expand...

actually thats a valid point....he does acknowledge the smoke will disappear, just that when he does it, its paranormal?

If that's your point, then yup. That's a little different than smoke does or does not disappear.
 
fromdownunder said:
My understanding is that the alarm is just there to objectively measure whether or not the smoke disappears more quickly than if it just dissipates at a normal rate.

If he stops the smoke in one container, the alarm will (naturally) stop. Without something to objectively measure if the smoke has been "supernaturally" removed, you could end up with:

a: "Look, the smoke is gone."
b: "no it hasn't"



Norm
Click to expand...

Yes thats exactly what I was getting at. Also and as well.
 
Problem. If you use two smoke detectors one may be more sensitive than the other. So you need to run several tests each time swapping over the detectors.

But really post 67 says to me what supernatural ability he has ... none.
 
fromdownunder said:
My understanding is that the alarm is just there to objectively measure whether or not the smoke disappears more quickly than if it just dissipates at a normal rate.

If he stops the smoke in one container, the alarm will (naturally) stop. Without something to objectively measure if the smoke has been "supernaturally" removed, you could end up with:

a: "Look, the smoke is gone."
b: "no it hasn't"

Norm
Click to expand...
Smoke alarms activate ONLY. They do not turn themselves off once the smoke is gone.
The only purpose a smoke alarm serves is to warn people that smoke is present.
The smoke alarm will continue to beep until the reset is hit or the batteries run out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom