• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Chris Christie: Pot legalization is bad because we'll have more small businesses

ravdin

Illuminator
Joined
Oct 16, 2005
Messages
4,985
Chris Christie on marijuana legalization:

Go to Colorado and see if you want to live there. See if you want to live in a major city in Colorado, where there are headshops popping up on every corner, and people flying into your airport just to get high.

To me, it's not the quality of life we want to have here in the state of New Jersey. And here's no tax revenue that's worth that.

Yep, it's tourism and small businesses that are making Colorado the hellhole it is today. I'm sure every resident of that unfortunate state wishes Colorado could be more like New Jersey. ;)

The man's pretty far out of touch if he really thinks that a resident of New Jersey or any other state needs to fly to Colorado to buy pot.

http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/04/christie_not_even_casual_marijuana_use_is_ok.html
 
If he's gonna run for the GOP nomination he's gotta keep a tight *******. It's about what I'd expect.
 
If I had a choice between flying to New Jersey to get high or flying to Colorado to be waterboarded, I'd choose Colorado.
 
My step father, a staunch Fox watching conservative, just came back from a trip to Colorado. He's never been too keen on pot being illegal but was still alright with people going to jail for it. After seeing it in Colorado he's strongly for legalization and thinks putting people away for it is stupid beyond belief. That other conservatives have the exact opposite reaction is to be expected, but some actually are open to evidence.
 
Refreshing to see a GOP heavyweight finally stop pretending to give a damn about small business.
 
I expect that Christie would support pot leagization if all the pot was sold on some sort of island that had one bridge to connect it to the mainland. That way Christie and his flunkies could turn the traffic on and off at will in order to get even with the their real and/or imagined political enemies.
 
I expect that Christie would support pot leagization if all the pot was sold on some sort of island that had one bridge to connect it to the mainland. That way Christie and his flunkies could turn the traffic on and off at will in order to get even with the their real and/or imagined political enemies.

You must not have heard of the report commissioned by Christie that found that Chris Christie had no involvement in that incident.

:rolleyes:
 
You must not have heard of the report commissioned by Christie that found that Chris Christie had no involvement in that incident.

:rolleyes:

Well, as a matter of fact, I sure did hear that.

Just like I heard that the Bush Administration did not torture detainees,
Just like I heard that Reagan had no involvement in Iran-Contra Affair,
Just like I heard that Nixon had no involvement in the Watergate Break-in,
Just like ...

And even if it is true that Christie had no involvement in that incident, he is still responsible for that incident since it was done by his own employees.

:rolleyes:
 
And even if it is true that Christie had no involvement in that incident, he is still responsible for that incident since it was done by his own employees.

:rolleyes:


Yeah, but they LIED to him. And that's the greatest crime of all (in his fat, twisted head).
 
I'm not sayin' I smoked weed with CC, but I'm not sayin' I didn't neither. All I'm sayin' is if you do smoke a bowl with CC, make sure you have some serious cash set aside for Taco Bell.

And that's all I'm sayin'.
 
The well is REALLY running dry on arguments FOR prohibition isn't it?

The arguments just get sillier and sillier - from the DEA chief's recent worry about pets getting into pot supplies (shades of the scare story that led to another retarded prohibition, California's prohibition of ferret ownership, based in part on fears from a tabloid story on a baby mauled to death by pot-crazed ferrets) to people here in Canada worrying about it leading to increased access by children (was always easier for me to score weed than alcohol - could get weed from 16 year olds, needed a 19+ in Ontario to get me booze!). And now this from Christie.

How do they say these things and not immediately realize how stupid it sounds??
 
Last edited:
The well is REALLY running dry on arguments FOR prohibition isn't it?

The arguments just get sillier and sillier - from the DEA chief's recent worry about pets getting into pot supplies (shades of the scare story that led to another retarded prohibition, California's prohibition of ferret ownership, based in part on fears from a tabloid story on a baby mauled to death by pot-crazed ferrets) to people here in Canada worrying about it leading to increased access by children (was always easier for me to score weed than alcohol - could get weed from 16 year olds, needed a 19+ in Ontario to get me booze!). And now this from Christie.

How do they say these things and not immediately realize how stupid it sounds??

See as "It doesn't ******* work!" isn't effective in convincing prohibitionists, none of their other gristle-brained arguments excuses come as much of a surprise.

ETA: FTFM.
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom