EtienneSC
Thinker
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2012
- Messages
- 199
I've looked at both. So basically you are asking us to believe your version of one of the central events of European history - Treblinka is the second most significant location after Auschwitz remember - on the basis of the following forensic evidence:No. The entire sentences appear in Lukaszkiewicz report on the shortened version I linked for you, that were totally edited out by MGK in the post you offered from them. Yes or No?
"During the work on the terrain, I found no mass graves, which, in connection with the statements by the witnesses Romanowski and Wiernik, leads to the conclusion that nearly all of the bodies of the victims were burned, all the more so since the camp was liquidated early and the murderers had much time."
I linked you to this version so you could read the criticisms of MGK's edits by Roberto Muehlenkamp. Did you read them?
My next question is about Eric's propaganda film. Have you actually watched it from start to finish?
a) excerpts from a Polish document that is not available in English (I cannot find it in book form and assume if you knew of an online version you would have linked to it)
b) an unpublished British doctoral thesis that cannot be consulted until 2016 at the earliest
c) inconclusive articles that reportedly summarize the thesis.
You have to admit, you don't have too impressive a brief to speak to after over 60 years of research. Doesn't that surprise you? Doesn't it suggest anything to you about your predecessors?