• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Hobby lobby and the slippery slope/SCOTUS decision

I feel any business with such an idiotic name deserves to fail regardless of its owner's insane politics. "Hobby Lobby"? I can appreciate that many four-year-olds and mental patients find rhyming clever, but in this case it's completely forced because nobody refers to a store as a "lobby". It's not what the word means. It's like if I opened a store that sold sinks and called it "Sink Rink" because "rink" rhymes with sink and is a place...except that a rink is a place for skating, not a place to purchase sinks. Or anything, really. "Hobby Lobby" just sounds stupider and stupider the more you think upon it. At the risk of sounding unduly harsh, whoever named the place should have their kneecaps hammered in backwards. Preferably in a room labelled "Hammer Slammer".
 
I feel any business with such an idiotic name deserves to fail regardless of its owner's insane politics. "Hobby Lobby"? I can appreciate that many four-year-olds and mental patients find rhyming clever, but in this case it's completely forced because nobody refers to a store as a "lobby". It's not what the word means. It's like if I opened a store that sold sinks and called it "Sink Rink" because "rink" rhymes with sink and is a place...except that a rink is a place for skating, not a place to purchase sinks. Or anything, really. "Hobby Lobby" just sounds stupider and stupider the more you think upon it. At the risk of sounding unduly harsh, whoever named the place should have their kneecaps hammered in backwards. Preferably in a room labelled "Hammer Slammer".

K, after you pick up your sink at the sink rink, I'll meet you at the piggly wiggly.

ETA: Also, you have *no* idea

0917_david-green_650x455.jpg


Indiana Jones style warehouse full of "biblical relics"
 
Last edited:
I feel any business with such an idiotic name deserves to fail regardless of its owner's insane politics. "Hobby Lobby"? I can appreciate that many four-year-olds and mental patients find rhyming clever, but in this case it's completely forced because nobody refers to a store as a "lobby". It's not what the word means. It's like if I opened a store that sold sinks and called it "Sink Rink" because "rink" rhymes with sink and is a place...except that a rink is a place for skating, not a place to purchase sinks. Or anything, really. "Hobby Lobby" just sounds stupider and stupider the more you think upon it. At the risk of sounding unduly harsh, whoever named the place should have their kneecaps hammered in backwards. Preferably in a room labelled "Hammer Slammer".


Meh. Lobby means a vestibule, reception area, or entrance hall. It also means a group of people organized to influence public officials on a particular issue. You can come up with metaphors that make sense.

How do you feel about Google?
 
Meh. Lobby means a vestibule, reception area, or entrance hall. It also means a group of people organized to influence public officials on a particular issue. You can come up with metaphors that make sense.

How do you feel about Google?
Googol is a number (a one followed by one hundred zeros) so there is at least a tie to something vaguely intelligent about 'google'.
 
I do support Hobby in this issue.

Then why are you taking the government's side?

The government is clear that HL can just cancel their health insurance plans if they don't want to comply with the law. There is a small penalty to pay for not providing health insurance, but I would think that is a trifling compared to standing up for one's religious beliefs. Or, forcing your employees to adhere to your religious beliefs while you make money off ignoring your religious beliefs. Whichever, I lose track.

In the end, Hobby has the trump care. They can play hard ball by just canceling their connection to providing health care insurance to their employees and pay the fine. The employees can go to Obama's Market Place to seek and pay for their own insurance.

Right. As I said, that's not a trump card, that is what the government has told them to do if they don't want to pay for acceptable coverage.

In todays work climate, I think Hobby's 15,000 employees are easily replaced as are the other's in the suit.

I have no idea what that is in reference to. Do you expect them to only hire people who pledge not to report violations of the ACA? Or do you imagine the family running the stores themselves? I really don't see where you are going with this . . .
 
Googol is a number (a one followed by one hundred zeros) so there is at least a tie to something vaguely intelligent about 'google'.

How is a number vaguely intelligent?

In any case, there are lots of silly company names, including malapropisms. Hobby Lobby doesn't strike me as exceptional in that regard.
 
From my FB feed:

I called my local Hobby Lobby and asked how much it would be if I need surgery on my knee.

"I don't know, we're not a health care provider."

I then asked if I could come down to their store for confession.

"No! We're not a church."

Exactly!!
 
From my FB feed:

I called my local Hobby Lobby and asked how much it would be if I need surgery on my knee.

"I don't know, we're not a health care provider."

I then asked if I could come down to their store for confession.

"No! We're not a church."

Exactly!!

You should have asked them if they allow sinning on the premises.
 
How is a number vaguely intelligent?

In any case, there are lots of silly company names, including malapropisms. Hobby Lobby doesn't strike me as exceptional in that regard.
The number isn't vaguely intelligent. I said the link between 'google' and the real number 'googol' is vaguely intelligent.
 
The number isn't vaguely intelligent. I said the link between 'google' and the real number 'googol' is vaguely intelligent.

Perhaps that's what you meant, but it's not what you wrote. You wrote "there is at least a tie to something vaguely intelligent" rather than "there is at least a tie which is vaguely intelligent."

I still don't understand what's intelligent about googol, or the concept of googol, or the link between the company and googol. I guess Google did get to have a little pun with naming their headquarters the Google-plex. Of course, you can plex any number, but I guess it got its start with googol.
 
Perhaps that's what you meant, but it's not what you wrote. You wrote "there is at least a tie to something vaguely intelligent" rather than "there is at least a tie which is vaguely intelligent."

I still don't understand what's intelligent about googol, or the concept of googol, or the link between the company and googol. I guess Google did get to have a little pun with naming their headquarters the Google-plex. Of course, you can plex any number, but I guess it got its start with googol.
Yup, my bad. I try to be concise but it seems to me that what I write doesn't match my thoughts. I should try Dragon Naturally Speaking because I tend to be able to verbalize better than I write.
 
Religious beliefs are not wacko or insane. Prayer and the Ten Commandments is a good thing. What, these employees can't figure out how to not get pregnant without their employers brains?
I am putting my money on the Supremes upholding the right of the people to practice the religion or lack thereof their choice.

Forcing your religion on your employees is insane. It just is.

Not getting the benefit you want is not punishment, Travis. I need glasses, but my employer isn't punishing me if it doesn't provide a vision plan.

Yes, they are punishing you. Maybe you don't see it that way but I do.
 
Then why are you taking the government's side?

The government is clear that HL can just cancel their health insurance plans if they don't want to comply with the law. There is a small penalty to pay for not providing health insurance, but I would think that is a trifling compared to standing up for one's religious beliefs. Or, forcing your employees to adhere to your religious beliefs while you make money off ignoring your religious beliefs. Whichever, I lose track.



Right. As I said, that's not a trump card, that is what the government has told them to do if they don't want to pay for acceptable coverage.



I have no idea what that is in reference to. Do you expect them to only hire people who pledge not to report violations of the ACA? Or do you imagine the family running the stores themselves? I really don't see where you are going with this . . .

Doc, the government is telling folk how to beat the law? Does DOJ know this???
 
Doc, the government is telling folk how to beat the law? Does DOJ know this???

Complying with the law by not offering insurance and paying the fine is not beating the law. I feel confident that the DOJ has a pretty good grasp on this.
 
Complying with the law by not offering insurance and paying the fine is not beating the law. I feel confident that the DOJ has a pretty good grasp on this.

G-d bless you Doc, but if DOJ does it will be the first thing they grasp in 6 years.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom