Loss Leader
I would save the receptionist., Moderator
JS,
- I just emailed Dr. Hoerl at Union. Thanks for the effort. I'll let you know what happens.
I'd love to see the text of your email.
JS,
- I just emailed Dr. Hoerl at Union. Thanks for the effort. I'll let you know what happens.
I'd love to see the text of your email.
Take your internet back.
Nommed. Pith.
- Ask, and you shall receive.I'd love to see the text of your email.
I think Jabba should post the text of his email, and the text of any replies he gets.
<snip for focus>For the last couple of years, I’ve been debating with the “skeptics” at http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/. My stage name is “Jabba,” and everyone else on the forum thinks I’m crazy, stupid or both…
<snip for focus>
“skeptics”
“skeptic”
.“skeptics”
....everyone else on the forum thinks I’m crazy, stupid or both...
....crazy, stupid or both...
Jabba, I have reported your post to the mods with a view to having your phone number obscured. Posting such is never a good idea.
I was hoping to catch Jabba in the edit window or the mods, whichever came first, but neither jabba nor a mod is online.Just what I was going to do.
That ship has sailed, if I understand the limits for edits. Best bet is if a mod sees the report.You really should not post your phone number on an open forum. I suggest you edit it.
Anyway, I’ve been arguing that I can essentially prove immortality through Bayesian Statistics
- Ask, and you shall receive.
- Dr. Hoerl got his PhD at the University of Delaware.
Dr. Hoerl,
I graduated from U of D back in ’65 (with Joe Biden!). I went on to NYU for a Masters in Ed Psych. I started a Phd program there, but decided to finish at SUNYA. I did finish all my course work, but that’s where it ended. If we get to talk some time, I’ll give you the rest of the story. I chose Statistics as my official “language,” and do enjoy its different concepts…
Anyway, my wife and I live on the edge of Niskayuna, about a mile from the Union campus, and I would like to communicate with you – personally, or by email – if you can find the time. I often have lunch over at the Union cafeteria.
For the last couple of years, I’ve been debating with the “skeptics” at http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/. My stage name is “Jabba,” and everyone else on the forum thinks I’m crazy, stupid or both…
You can find my latest venture starting at http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=248163.
Anyway, I’ve been arguing that I can essentially prove immortality through Bayesian Statistics. Obviously, no one I know, or that is on the forum, agrees with me – but, I still think it’s true…
A concept that we on the thread are currently tripping over is the number of “potential selves.” Does seem sort of crazy, huh? Anyway, one of the skeptics looked you up and suggested that I ask you about my claims.
You now have my email address.
Hope to talk to you soon.
Rich Savage
Rather than directing the professor to this meat grinder of a thread, perhaps you should just summarize your ideas for him. Then ask him specific questions about your ideas. You didn't actually ask him for anything.
You had to quote it.Why the scary "quote" marks?
1. If I were you, I would try to remove your phone number, as others have suggested. It is not generally a good idea to include phone numbers on the web.
2. I agree that the less discussion of this thread in your conversations with Dr. Hoeri the less backstory he/she will have to read, and the less likely he/she will prejudge you request. Also, as far as I know, no post here ever accused you of being stupid, even if we feel that some of your views are in error and require additional information to be correct. Also be assured that I actively avoid debating with actual crazy people. There is no point, and it is offensive to me.
3. It is of course fine to ask Dr. Hoeri if your use of Bayes formulas apply to reincarnation; this is math. But more specifically, I hoped that he/she was being consulted about your novel concepts of something being intrinsically or extrinsically finite and VWs being potentially infinite and cards/lottery tickets not. This is what I am particularly interested in from a math point of view, Frankly his/her views of the self are not relevant; he/she is a math professor and has no particular expertise on this metaphysical matter.
LL Blank the phone number.
- How about this.
- I've defined the poker situation as a "closed" system -- the possibilities are limited by the givens. Such is not the case in the Volkswagen situation -- if the number of possible different (separate) Volkswagens is limited, it is limited by "non-givens."
- These are two different types of limitations -- two different types of "finiteness."
- Can you agree to that, so far? By agreeing, you will not be committing to anything else -- and, you will still be free to change your mind, anyway.
AAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGHHHH? By now it has been variously grabbed, so mitigation is all thats left.Can't moderate a thread I'm involved in. The report is in and will be dealt with.