Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2003
- Messages
- 64,285
At this point US mass consciousness is completely degenerated. A disgusting spectacle.
... said the Chavez apologist.
At this point US mass consciousness is completely degenerated. A disgusting spectacle.
RT Editor-in-Chief Op-Ed: About Abby Martin, Liz Wahl and media wars
At this point US mass consciousness is completely degenerated. A disgusting spectacle.
A rival media anchor’s resignation is certainly much more newsworthy and more relevant to the Ukraine crisis
than two European leaders saying opposition henchmen may have been killing people.
Yesterday I spent quite some time explaining to a New York Times correspondent why I consider Russia’s position to be right. I’m Russian. I support my country and I will fight for the truth for as long as it takes. Neither Abby, nor Liz, nor many other employees are Russian nationals, but foreign.
Yes, in all of its steps it is a farce, especially the referendum. Those proclamations of independend or annexed Crimea are Putin's posturing, but with very serious tones and repercussions of course. He wanted the world to listen, has gotten its ear, and he has a serious grip of the bargaining chip Crimea.Apparently there will be a referendum in the Crimea on whether or not to stay in the Ukraine.
All managed by the Russians ,of course.
I really hope that people see this as the stage managed farce it is. But I am afrais that some people..particularly in Europe, will buy it hook, line and sinker. They are looking for ANY excuse to appease Putin that will them a cover, no matter how thin and tattered, of moral respectablity for their decision.
Yes, in all of its steps it is a farce, especially the referendum. Those proclamations of independend or annexed Crimea are Putin's posturing, but with very serious tones and repercussions of course. He wanted the world to listen, has gotten its ear, and he has a serious grip of the bargaining chip Crimea.
One needs to take a look at the background of the guy Russia installed as a new Crimean PM to see that he is disposable. Getting rid of him wouldn't be much of a sacrifice for Russian interests in the area, which may be one of the reasons why they chose him in the first place. Putin is perfectly able to and will tighten his grip there until he considers there's serious efforts from Ukraine and especially the West to understand and consider his terms - which he sees as vital.
It's not worrying what the regular Putin apologists may think about it, but what the people of power in Ukraine and the West think and how they respond. So far Ukraine has done commendably well. And I think the EU did good today, but it's just one of the first steps and there's still lot of room for missteps by all sides and parties (re: Georgia).
Very true.TO miy mind pushing nutjobs like Alex Jones would alone be enough evidence to move a TV network into the "totally unreliable as a source of information" category.
I'd say more entertaining. But if there were live defections in what amounted to Washington controlled and directed News, RT would be reporting on it probably as much as the Anglo-Sphere is reporting on Abby and Liz.
How exactly does Ukraine plan on enforcing the dissolution of the Crimean Parliament?
Sounds like a bit of a stretch. They can't really do that without provocation. Crimean is a serious stalemate.
In the last tense months, the conflict in Ukraine has been described as a fight over Ukrainian identity—in terms of language, territory, and great-power influence. Maps on television and in newspapers show a country conveniently cleaved in half between Ukrainian speakers in the pro-Yulia Tymoshenko west and Russian speakers in the Yanukovych east. The former love Europe; the latter love Russia. The former have been oppressed for centuries by the latter, who want to see a return to the days of the USSR.
But Cherkashin’s informal office lecture demonstrated that the truth is more complicated, as it always is. The real split is generational. Unlike Cherkashin, his students were all born after 1991, in an independent Ukraine, and they see their country’s close relationship with Russia very differently than their older professor. In fact, Cherkashin’s own research confirms this division. The younger a citizen of Donetsk, the more likely she is to view herself as Ukrainian. The older she is, the more likely she is to identify as Russian. And this is the crux of it all: What we are seeing today is the reverberation of what happened more than 20 years ago. This is still the long post-Soviet transition.
Good, finally someone in the media has noticed the generational split. Perhaps they start to look at the published opinion surveys next and analyzing the data... nooo that's probably too much to ask for.
^ Interesting. Could you link to say half a dozen of those numerous articles? May be good reads.
Appears that the heat is turning up in Odessa.