• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC Dust Study Feb 29, 2012 by Dr. James Millette

ozeco41 said:
That one is easy.

Whatever failings he may have in science Harrit does not troll internet forums. So he didn't need the information to play silly games with.
Click to expand...

It is very seldom that Harrit engages in debates on the internet and even at his many lectures you will be stopped by either Harrit or one of his disciples, if you have critical questions regarding his claims.

But this Friday february 28th from 17:00 till 19:00 CET Harrit will be available online for questions on the Danish communist newspaper Arbejderen (The Worker):

http://arbejderen.dk/arbejderen/sandhedsvidne-eller-sølvpapirshat

Anybody can ask questions, so perhaps this is an opportunity to get some answers regarding his views on the red/gray chips.
 
Thus, Bentham Open is a place for people to publish their theories, theses, and ideas that are out of the mainstream.
​
http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2009/09/criticism-of-oa-publisher-bentham.html

It mentions the ATM paper specifically.

It's revealing on what opinion the paper has in mainstream science just as a function of the publication it appeared on. It's not about attacking the publication instead of the paper, it's about your (Miragememories') point on the interest it raises in mainstream science.
 
Miragememories said:
... The thermite found by Dr. Harrit et al may not have a matching un-redacted public record, but there is public documention establishing its existence and availability in a wide range of tailorable formulations.

MM
Click to expand...
Bentham Open’s emergence into scholarly publishing in 2007 has served mainly as a venue to publish research of questionable quality. The site has exploited the Open Access model for its own financial motives and flooded scholarly communication with a flurry of low quality and questionable research. By linking to sites such as Bentham Open, libraries are diluting scholarly research and making it more difficult for scholars to sort through the abundance of journal articles available. ...http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2009/09/criticism-of-oa-publisher-bentham.html

Jones and Harrit found four different formulations of dust, which does not match the heat output of thermite. Zero for four.
Then the DSC is so far off you have to wonder if anyone in 911 truth can see.

111JonesDelusion.jpg

911 truth followers can't explain what a DSC is for, and this shows Jones did not find thermite, but 911 truth followers don't care, they keep spreading lies. Jones made up the fantasy thermite did it, and 911 truth followers don't care there was not damage to steel from thermite, they keep spreading stupid lies.

JonesHarritDelusion.jpg

WTC Chips, aka fake thermite, does not match thermite. The paper quibbles and says the organic part adds energy, and they forgot to say what made less energy. Thermite with less energy?

911 truth followers can't read for comprehension, and are doomed to eternal failure. Why do 911 truth followers mock the murdered on 911?

Jones paper is fraud, Millette's paper is science. Reading comprehension is the key.
 
Last edited:
Josarhus said:
It is very seldom that Harrit engages in debates on the internet and even at his many lectures you will be stopped by either Harrit or one of his disciples, if you have critical questions regarding his claims.

But this Friday february 28th from 17:00 till 19:00 CET Harrit will be available online for questions on the Danish communist newspaper Arbejderen (The Worker):

http://arbejderen.dk/arbejderen/sandhedsvidne-eller-sølvpapirshat

Anybody can ask questions, so perhaps this is an opportunity to get some answers regarding his views on the red/gray chips.
Click to expand...

Thanks Josarhus,
Live chat NOW if you can translate?
 
Josarhus said:
"It is very seldom that Harrit engages in debates on the internet and even at his many lectures you will be stopped by either Harrit or one of his disciples, if you have critical questions regarding his claims.

But this Friday february 28th from 17:00 till 19:00 CET Harrit will be available online for questions on the Danish communist newspaper Arbejderen (The Worker):

http://arbejderen.dk/arbejderen/sandhedsvidne-eller-sølvpapirshat

Anybody can ask questions, so perhaps this is an opportunity to get some answers regarding his views on the red/gray chips."
Click to expand...
Spanx said:
"Thanks Josarhus,
Live chat NOW if you can translate?"
Click to expand...

As expected, Dr. Harrit was not interested in discussing Dr. Millette's unpublished musings.

MM
 
Spanx said:
Thanks Josarhus,
Live chat NOW if you can translate?
Click to expand...

I managed to ask the question, are you aware of the work carried out by Dr James Millette? To which I got the reply 'is he published'

I can only assume that he is unaware as Millette's work is not peer reviewed which brings me to the conclusion that anything MM claims about Harrits point of view on Millette's work is rubbish.

Unfortunately my others questions did not get published ;)
 
Spanx said:
I managed to ask the question, are you aware of the work carried out by Dr James Millette? To which I got the reply 'is he published'

I can only assume that he is unaware as Millette's work is not peer reviewed which brings me to the conclusion that anything MM claims about Harrits point of view on Millette's work is rubbish.

Unfortunately my others questions did not get published ;)
Click to expand...


Sorry I couldn't help translating, but I followed the chat myself, and I am putting together a resume of Harrits answers, some of them are interesting.

Harrit knows damn well about Millettes work, but refuses to answer anything regarding this untill it is published. It is clearly a defense mechanisms, that lets Harrit avoid the really hard questions.
 
TALK IS CHEAP

Spanx said:
"I managed to ask the question, are you aware of the work carried out by Dr James Millette?

To which I got the reply 'is he published'

I can only assume that he is unaware as Millette's work is not peer reviewed which brings me to the conclusion that anything MM claims about Harrits point of view on Millette's work is rubbish."
Click to expand...

You can't even get a simple quote right.

He replied; "is it published?"

I have corresponded with Dr. Harrit for a few years now and he is quite aware of Dr. Millette's 'unpublished' claims.

Dr. Harrit has made it quite clear that he awaits Dr. Millette's published findings.

When and if Dr. Millette ever publishes his findings, Dr. Harrit will publish a reply.

MM
 
NoahFence said:
Baloney.
Click to expand...
I'm sure he will. He'll say he had the wrong chips and "truthers" wouldn't dream of questioning it. He'll continue like nothing happened.

His only problem will come if Basile actually does send chips to an independent lab and they come back as paint. There is an out there too though. Basile specified the same separation criteria as in the Harrit paper, which we all know is not sufficient to identify the "correct" chips.
 
Last edited:
And the whole topic is irrelevant - a "red herring" derail - given that there was no CD.

Fun maybe debating chemistry - but only truther "arse about logic" (start from the conclusion you want and make a token effort of working back towards the start) sees it has having any link to 9/11 WTC collapse.

Even if "they" prove tonnes of thermXte at ground zero it has zero effect on "No CD". And, with no ?CD, why is it being discussed other than as troll feeding?
 
Miragememories said:
You can't even get a simple quote right.

He replied; "is it published?"

I have corresponded with Dr. Harrit for a few years now and he is quite aware of Dr. Millette's 'unpublished' claims.

Dr. Harrit has made it quite clear that he awaits Dr. Millette's published findings.

When and if Dr. Millette ever publishes his findings, Dr. Harrit will publish a reply.

MM
Click to expand...

Lol, talk is cheap,

And of course Harrit replying" is it published "instead of "is he published" makes all the difference in truther world .

At least it shows he has not replied to Millette's work and your comments are BS.
You dream of being his ambassador :rolleyes:
 
Miragememories said:
You can't even get a simple quote right.

He replied; "is it published?"

I have corresponded with Dr. Harrit for a few years now and he is quite aware of Dr. Millette's 'unpublished' claims.

Dr. Harrit has made it quite clear that he awaits Dr. Millette's published findings.

When and if Dr. Millette ever publishes his findings, Dr. Harrit will publish a reply.
Click to expand...

Spanx said:
"Lol, talk is cheap."
Click to expand...

You appear to enjoy demonstrating that.

Spanx said:
"And of course Harrit replying" is it published "instead of "is he published" makes all the difference in truther world."
Click to expand...

Since, "is it published" (meaning the published 2012 report) is what Dr. Harrit was referring to, and "is he published" (means has Dr. Millette ever been published) have two distinctly different meanings, the distinction makes a great deal of difference.

Spanx said:
"At least it shows he has not replied to Millette's work and your comments are BS.
You dream of being his ambassador :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

It shows that Dr. Harrit, like the rest of us, is waiting for Dr. Millette to put up or shut up.

MM
 
The same Dr. Harrit that says no plane hit the Pentagon?

That one? Nice company you keep. What a vile, vile man. Or maybe just twisted. You know him, MM - which is it? Vile, or sick?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom