NRCC is proud of their idea to create fake Dem websites

[Foolmewunz]

I cited to the earlier version of the website to allow people to draw their own conclusions.

How is this website affecting your local race in Thailand anyway?

Race??!!! All you libruls always bring up race! Is it the only card you have??


Our neo-cryptic fascists here are realists. They (unlike the GOP and particularly the Tea Party) evidently took math in school and they know they will never again win a popular election as long as there's universal suffrage. They are blatantly demanding that "someone" (read: The Palace, under request by the military) appoint them as interim government until they can "reform" the election laws. "Reform" has much the same meaning to the ultra right wing here as it does to the Tea Party and radical conservative faction of the GOP... "make my vote worth more than the other guy's vote".

They're just honest about it. Instead of compromising on some of their positions, they support the status quo... of forty years ago. They don't want no peasants and laborers voting, no sirree. Why there are voters down in Southern Thailand who don't speak a lick of Thai or Issan! Why should they vote? (Oh, but they're very good for filling buses and creating the illusion of a populist uprising, e.g. the current demonstrations. Seeing as to how they don't read Thai, they probably don't realize the people sending them on their four day vacation to Bangkok will disenfranchise them if they get back into power.)

Oh, and sorry for the derail.... you're still wrong. The GOP changed the second page because the first one was too obviously a continuation of the scam intent.

 

[Molinaro]

CNN has another story this time pointing out that 15 of the sites have had their donation page redesigned to be less misleading. The article also mentions that this changed occurred after they had interviewed someone who had donated $1000 and didn't realize it was going to the NRCC until after submitting.

 

[Foolmewunz]

CNN has another story this time pointing out that 15 of the sites have had their donation page redesigned to be less misleading. The article also mentions that this changed occurred after they had interviewed someone who had donated $1000 and didn't realize it was going to the NRCC until after submitting.

No, it was satire. Anyone could see that. (Well, except their lawyers in all likelihood, who no doubt told them to change it or prepare to pay the piper... plus court costs having to defend themselves in fifteen different jurisdictions.)


@16.5 - yeah, just cosmetic changes. You stand up for them, fella! They're right up there with Swift and Twain and Mencken.

 

[The Big Dog]

CNN has another story this time pointing out that 15 of the sites have had their donation page redesigned to be less misleading. The article also mentions that this changed occurred after they had interviewed someone who had donated $1000 and didn't realize it was going to the NRCC until after submitting.

well, I'll be damned. They found someone who was "misled." And they even had a name, Randy Frails.

Even more amazingly? He is a lawyer. A simple country lawyer, no doubt.

Well a simple country lawyer with extensive connections and clients among the democratic part in Georgia. A lawyer who has previously represented democratic party endorsed candidates and has extensive experience in campaign contributions.

BAW GAWD KING! If they could "mislead" him, they could mislead ANYBODY!

Hee hee! Silly, transparent stunt is silly and transparent.

"He was fumbling around for his credit card when he got a call... from his wife.... duh duh duh DUH!"

Hilarious! Thanks for the laughs!

 

[Foolmewunz]

well, I'll be damned. They found someone who was "misled." And they even had a name, Randy Frails.

Even more amazingly? He is a lawyer. A simple country lawyer, no doubt.

Well a simple country lawyer with extensive connections and clients among the democratic part in Georgia. A lawyer who has previously represented democratic party endorsed candidates and has extensive experience in campaign contributions.

BAW GAWD KING! If they could "mislead" him, they could mislead ANYBODY!

Hee hee! Silly, transparent stunt is silly and transparent.

"He was fumbling around for his credit card when he got a call... from his wife.... duh duh duh DUH!"

Hilarious! Thanks for the laughs!

You don't appreciate "satire" when it's done to the Republicans? Frails was satirizing them.

I think you may have stumbled on this year's "Not meant to be a factual statement".... "It was satire, folks!"

"Uh, Congressman, is it true your brother-in-law sent out fourteen thousand fliers using your franking privilege, advising that the election was being held on a Wednesday?"

"Well, hell, son. That was a satire. Dad gum libruls don't know humor when they see it."

>>>>

"Senator! Norman Beekman from the Cleveland Plain Dealer. Would you like to comment on candidate Akins' strange ideas about rape being a gift from God?"

"I say, I say, son... you don't get it do ya? It's sat-tire."

>>>>>>>>>

 

[The Big Dog]

You don't appreciate "satire" when it's done to the Republicans? Frails was satirizing them.

What part of "Hilarious! Thanks for the laughs!" did you not understand?

Lolz, they had to fake up some political operator to serve as the "misled." Fantastic!

 

[AlBell]

It is interesting to see how so-called "critical thinking" is being used, here, to display a complete and absolute lack of morals and ethics, and a policy suborned completely by achieving power for the Christian Taliban.

Are you continuing to provide names to the authorities of Xian Taliban members whose behaviors break laws? Or haven't you even started doing so?