Looking for Skeptics

Status
Not open for further replies.
Biscuit said:
If your investigators conclude that nothing paranormal is occurring what will your next step be?
Click to expand...

It's already concluded something paranormal is afoot, hence investigation with the press covering the night. You want to see who they are up against? Lets try an upload (not been able to upload since some folk scoffed at the earier images)
 
flaccon said:
It's already concluded something paranormal is afoot, hence investigation with the press covering the night. You want to see who they are up against? Lets try an upload (not been able to upload since some folk scoffed at the earier images)
Click to expand...

Hope that works. That's our real enemy.
 
flaccon said:
It is a voice, it comes from a PC in Notts. That same voice can be identified on many other PC's now. It is happening, but I wish a lot of it wasn't.
Click to expand...

I have an idea for a very simple test, Flaccon. An independent skeptic passes a short message, 2 or 3 sentences, to you. Using whatever setup you consider ideal, you then pass the message onto your father's ghost. A member of your inner circle whom you consider sensitive enough then uses whatever setup they consider ideal to receive the message back from said spirit. That person then passes the message back to the independent skeptic. If the transmitted message exactly matches the received message, the test would indicate paranormal activity. If not, the test would indicate no paranormal activity.

Seems solid to me. Any objections?
 
abaddon said:
How is it that you cannot recognise that unevidenced claims are as useful as a raincoat in a nuclear reactor core? If you continue with this bizarre lack of anything which might support your claims, how can you be in any way surprised at rejection?

If I claimed that rainbows are the direct result of unicorn farts, would you believe me? If I further claimed that a team of scientists were investigating, would you simply believe me? If I further claimed that a reporter was following the story with a view to publishing an article, would you believe me? If I further claimed that these people could not be revealed for spurious reasons, would you believe me?

Bluntly, I wouldn't believe me.
Click to expand...

I am not at all surprised by rejection, nor am I put off by it. I'll not be denying the truth simply cos you can't deal with it.
 
trustbutverify said:
I have an idea for a very simple test, Flaccon. An independent skeptic passes a short message, 2 or 3 sentences, to you. Using whatever setup you consider ideal, you then pass the message onto your father's ghost. A member of your inner circle whom you consider sensitive enough then uses whatever setup they consider ideal to receive the message back from said spirit. That person then passes the message back to the independent skeptic. If the transmitted message exactly matches the received message, the test would indicate paranormal activity. If not, the test would indicate no paranormal activity.

Seems solid to me. Any objections?
Click to expand...

How about a game of flash cards? seems less complicated? If the spirits allow me to show you an image, and you guess what it is? I'll start with my fave. Actually it's a tiny part of a bigger picture, but lets start with easier images. You up for that?
 
Last edited:
flaccon said:
Listen, you can sit at the end of any PC and spout off your ridicule, but you'll not escape his consequence.
Click to expand...

How dare you criticize what I see. That's so closed minded.

I'm telling you, this breed can turn on you, I'm not surprised at all.
 
trustbutverify said:
A member of your inner circle whom you consider sensitive enough then uses whatever setup they consider ideal to receive the message back from said spirit.
Click to expand...


Way too much chance for inappropriate communication between the subject and the recipient.
 
Loss Leader said:
Way too much chance for inappropriate communication between the subject and the recipient.
Click to expand...

I didn't include steps to prevent such communication because, considering who I'm addressing, I felt it was necessary to present the simplest, most stripped down version possible. I felt eliminating the possibility of normal communication between transmitter and receiver was obvious and indirectly implied. Sorry I didn't specify that.
 
Loss Leader said:
Two hours since you posted and you haven't sent me any details.
Click to expand...

I can't send you details til I prove it. You believe the press didn't interview family members. I can prove that when it's exposed in the press. Then I can come collect. Is that right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom