Whilst I appreciate the time the gent took to come here, I cannot appreciate his evaluation, it contained nothing I recognised, and even when I prompted him to mention the "voices" he'd heard, he confessed he didn't mention the voices because he couldn't see what was paranormal about "voices" One of those voices is my late Father. One voice didn't count as a voice because it was chipmonk-like, it was still clear. One voice that was a normal voice, also wasn't a voice because if he came back here and said these were indeed voices, he'd be ridiculed too. All that gets overlooked. Jfisher describing his recording as "constant" noise all the way through *a whirring fan and rain" I listened to it and yes, he'd described it accurate. When I played it through this PC there were differences, interference, complete silences even. As far as I know, the original altered in the same way. Whatever I have tried to provide, is hand waved, overlooked, medically evaluated or scoffed at.