NRCC is proud of their idea to create fake Dem websites

[The Big Dog]

Why do you keep repeating the highlit part? There is no such statement on that page. Have you not read the page linked to, or do you just wish for it to say that, or are you hoping that people will read your contention and accept it because of your past record of honesty and even-handed treatment, or are you saying that the site IMPLIES those words?

Just in case you need to check, here's the link to the site, again.

http://johnlewis4congress.com/

Christ. Hit the "donate" button foolmewunz. Just go ahead and do that, would you?

Just in case you need to check, here's the link to the site, again, that has the donate button right the hell on it.

http://johnlewis4congress.com/

The guy questions my "honesty" because he misunderstood my posts and did not follow the very link we were talking about.

Unbelievable.

 

[BenBurch]

How about I create "Citizens to Defeat Obama" and fill it with all of the most popular anti-Obama rhetoric and collect donations which we promise to use to ensure that "Comrade Berry Hussain Obama" doesn't win re-election in 2016? And of course quietly funnel all that money to Hillary because of course she is the best hope for defeating him?

Would that sit alright with everybody?

 

[The Big Dog]

How about I create "Citizens to Defeat Obama" and fill it with all of the most popular anti-Obama rhetoric and collect donations which we promise to use to ensure that "Comrade Berry Hussain Obama" doesn't win re-election in 2016? And of course quietly funnel all that money to Hillary because of course she is the best hope for defeating him?

Would that sit alright with everybody?

Knock yourself out.

I would have thought that the Constitution (the 22nd amendment in particular) was the best hope for defeating him, but hey, what ever floats your boat.

 

[NoahFence]

They're dishonest websites. You know it, I know it, the people who are making them know it.

Why not just admit it and be done with the dog and pony show?

 

[Foolmewunz]

Christ. Hit the "donate" button foolmewunz. Just go ahead and do that, would you?

Just in case you need to check, here's the link to the site, again, that has the donate button right the hell on it.

http://johnlewis4congress.com/

The guy questions my "honesty" because he misunderstood my posts and did not follow the very link we were talking about.

Unbelievable.

Precious, I think he's getting upset. What? No, Precious, he didn't address the question, did he. We showed him. We even used the yellow Hilite , didn't we Precious? But he hasn't showed where that sentence is on the page, has he? No, Precious, he hasn't.

"Make a Contribution Today to Help Defeat John Lewis and candidates like him"

Does anyone else see that statement on that page, right before the Donate button as he claims? Is there different text in the US of A from over here in Thailand? Or was our non-partisan poster making some of whatcher call yer paraphrasing? 'Cuz for the life of me, I just can't see those words.

 

[AlBell]

Precious, I think he's getting upset. What? No, Precious, he didn't address the question, did he. We showed him. We even used the yellow Hilite , didn't we Precious? But he hasn't showed where that sentence is on the page, has he? No, Precious, he hasn't.




Does anyone else see that statement on that page, right before the Donate button as he claims? Is there different text in the US of A from over here in Thailand? Or was our non-partisan poster making some of whatcher call yer paraphrasing? 'Cuz for the life of me, I just can't see those words.

Do you have him on ignore?

16.5: "Christ. Hit the "donate" button foolmewunz. Just go ahead and do that, would you?"

The message AIUI is after you push Donate. No, I don't intend to find out either.

 

[The Big Dog]

drivel snipped

Does anyone else see that statement on that page, right before the Donate button as he claims? Is there different text in the US of A from over here in Thailand? Or was our non-partisan poster making some of whatcher call yer paraphrasing? 'Cuz for the life of me, I just can't see those words.

That is because you are grossly dishonest:

https://www.nrcc.org/john-lewis-for-congress/contribute/

I told you to hit the donate button. Right where I said it was.

Make a Contribution Today to Help Defeat John Lewis and candidates like him

Find it yet, or just going to continue misleading people with your bad faith claims.

unbelievable.

Make a Contribution Today to Help Defeat John Lewis and candidates like him

 

[Foolmewunz]

Do you have him on ignore?

16.5: "Christ. Hit the "donate" button foolmewunz. Just go ahead and do that, would you?"

The message AIUI is after you push Donate. No, I don't intend to find out either.

That is because you are grossly dishonest:

https://www.nrcc.org/john-lewis-for-congress/contribute/

I told you to hit the donate button. Right where I said it was.

Make a Contribution Today to Help Defeat John Lewis and candidates like him

Find it yet, or just going to continue misleading people with your bad faith claims.

unbelievable.

Make a Contribution Today to Help Defeat John Lewis and candidates like him

And that is AFTER you hit DONATE on the first page, not before. (And no, I wasn't going to hit "Donate" on a GOP scam page.)


ETA: And try to argue in good faith, won't you. "Grossly dishonest"?

 

[The Big Dog]

And that is AFTER you hit DONATE on the first page, not before. (And no, I wasn't going to hit "Donate" on a GOP scam page.)

This is the type of dishonest nonsense I have to put up with.

The donate button takes you to page that contains the quote I said and thereafter you have to fill in your personal information if you want to donate.

Unbelievable.

 

[Unabogie]

Funny, I thought honesty was a virtue, not a weakness reserved for losers.

 

[Foolmewunz]

This is the type of dishonest nonsense I have to put up with.

The donate button takes you to page that contains the quote I said and thereafter you have to fill in your personal information if you want to donate.

Unbelievable.

Have you looked at the first page.... with a Donate button. And which, as I stated, has no such statement.

It's on the second page. I concede that, but it's not on the first page that I linked to. Will you concede that?

Fine. No go back to your apologia for all things Republican.

 

[NoahFence]

Have you looked at the first page.... with a Donate button. And which, as I stated, has no such statement.

It's on the second page. I concede that, but it's not on the first page that I linked to. Will you concede that?

Fine. No go back to your apologia for all things Republicandishonest.

FTFY

 

[The_Animus]

If you recall, the California GOP did the same thing for the California health care exchange website. Make a fake one, similarly named, to confuse, frustrate, and discourage them from getting coverage.

But really people why are you taking 16.5 seriously? Anyone familiar with his posts should know better.

 

[Trakar]

Check the dishonesty from the extreme right group ForAmerica that is on the other thread.
The image says the government spent 200,000,000 during the half hour long halftime show. They put it up on a photo of the halftime show. Subtle difference is they didn't actually say the government spent all that ON the Halftime show, just during.

80 percent of respondents read it wrong, that the government spent it ON the super bowl, and based their responses accordingly. The morons that made that image know damn well they are being dishonest. These are the same people behind this website program.

Congrats. Your grand old party is being taken over by INTERNET TROLLS.

It's actually happening.

I thought that was the nest that most internet trolls were hatched from to begin with?

 

[Trakar]

Precious, I think he's getting upset. What? No, Precious, he didn't address the question, did he. We showed him. We even used the yellow Hilite , didn't we Precious? But he hasn't showed where that sentence is on the page, has he? No, Precious, he hasn't.




Does anyone else see that statement on that page, right before the Donate button as he claims? Is there different text in the US of A from over here in Thailand? Or was our non-partisan poster making some of whatcher call yer paraphrasing? 'Cuz for the life of me, I just can't see those words.

In fact, when you hover over the donate button the window the tag that pops up says "John Lewis for Congress - Contribute"

 

[Foolmewunz]

In fact, when you hover over the donate button the window the tag that pops up says "John Lewis for Congress - Contribute"

But it's satire. That's okay.

I'm going to try that the next time I stick up a 7/11. "But officer, yeah, I took six hundred dollars and a six pack of PBR, but it was satire. I just wanted to show the owners that they needed to have a sense of humor about me stealing from them."

 

[The Big Dog]

But it's satire. That's okay.

I'm going to try that the next time I stick up a 7/11. "But officer, yeah, I took six hundred dollars and a six pack of PBR, but it was satire. I just wanted to show the owners that they needed to have a sense of humor about me stealing from them."

I'm sure that people would be more impressed with your hyperbole had you not fraudulently accused me of misquoting a page you refused to actually look at.

 

[Foolmewunz]

I'm sure that people would be more impressed with your hyperbole had you not fraudulently accused me of misquoting a page you refused to actually look at.

I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt based on the fact that you were referring to the second page. You appear unable to understand that I was referring to the first page. Me? I'd chalk it up to a mistake. You? Speaking of hyperbole, you call it "fraudulent". My five year old understand the difference between a mistake and a lie.

How about you reply to the post I was replying to. Hover the cursor over the donate button on the first page of the site. Does it say, "Ha ha, this is a joke, we're really from the GOP"? Does it say, "This is not really a Lewis site, we hate him"? No, it says "John Lewis for Congress. Contribute."

 

[The Big Dog]

I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt based on the fact that you were referring to the second page. You appear unable to understand that I was referring to the first page. Me? I'd chalk it up to a mistake. You? Speaking of hyperbole, you call it "fraudulent". My five year old understand the difference between a mistake and a lie.

How about you reply to the post I was replying to. Hover the cursor over the donate button on the first page of the site. Does it say, "Ha ha, this is a joke, we're really from the GOP"? Does it say, "This is not really a Lewis site, we hate him"? No, it says "John Lewis for Congress. Contribute."

Yeah, you called me dishonest, twice, because you were ignorant about the facts. You'll forgive me if I don't bother answering anything you say anymore.

 

[Molinaro]

Why do you keep repeating the highlit part? There is no such statement on that page. Have you not read the page linked to, or do you just wish for it to say that, or are you hoping that people will read your contention and accept it because of your past record of honesty and even-handed treatment, or are you saying that the site IMPLIES those words?

Just in case you need to check, here's the link to the site, again.

http://johnlewis4congress.com/

Bolding mine. Seems pretty obvious to me that Foolmewunz is referring to the home page of the site which is what was being talked about in this thread. Not once is there any mention of any of the other pages of the site.

For 16.5 to try and pretend that you were being deliberately dishonest is downright absurd.

Foolmewunz says "that page" and links to the page he is talking about. All 16.5 had to do is say, it's not on that page, it's on this one. And provide a link or instructions for where to click. End of story.

Instead, we get drama and word games and conspiracy and well forum rules prevent a more accurate description of what we get.