Darth Rotor
Salted Sith Cynic
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2006
- Messages
- 38,527
Any judge of general jurisdiction of any State may issue the warrant and hear the evidence of criminality.
Such a judge would be found at 516 3rd Ave, Seattle, WA in the King County Courthouse.
Some "E" getting inserted into the JREF, even in a Foxy Knoxy thread! Many thanks.I have read it, but I know as a matter of procedure that it will be turned over to the Feds. That the State and the local municipalities who might arrest Amanda, will still transport her to the holding facility at the Western District Court house and the extradition hearing will take place at the US District (Western) Court, not a State or Municipal court.
Just FYI, here in the US there are often multiple layers of appeal, so I'll suggest we are not all that different.Funny how when she was acquitted we hear that the process is not completed. Verdict not final. Best 3 out of 5 scenario.
Now she's back to being a convicted murderer. Wanna go 4 out of 7 ?
Heh, politics in America are filthy.Politics in America arent the same as the Biased Italian court system.
kestrel, can you elaborate on that point? What's behind it, stuff having nothing to do with the Knox/Kercher/Scollito/Guede case?The Italian justice system was designed to uphold an authoritarian regime. ... snip ...
Perhaps someday the Italian justice system will change to fit Italy's status as a modern industrialized democracy. But as of today they are far from that standard.
Interesting read, thanks.Hellman says they violated the law.
Well, there's always a first time, but supporting that assertion (bolded) would seem to me to fit under the theme of "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."For instance, it was argued Amanda killed Meredith for refusing to take part in group sex. Was it credible a woman who had shown no previous interest in group sex would kill someone for refusing to take part in an orgy?
That's the part that has always puzzled me: the impression that the two trials were not better linked ... given that it was the same murder. However, as I am not deeply familiar with Italian law, I can see any number of ways that various defendants might be advised by counsel to seek a separate trial in a related case ...Nencini: "In fact the peculiarity of the process was this: a person already convicted on summary judgment and a final competition for the same murder. The Supreme Court asked us to evaluate the role of competitors. We could say that there were two defendants, motivating convincingly. But we did not consider this to be the truth."
P.S. I think it's reasonable to assume the word accomplices should be substituted for competitors.
Last edited: