Merged Apollo "hoax" discussion - continuation thread

JayUtah said:
Iridescence, for one.
Click to expand...

So the moon dust is so specially iridescence that it looks gray in virtually all the NASA photos? Sounds exceptional. Why is it that debunkers stack exception upon incredible exception on top of each other?
 
Anders Lindman said:
So the moon dust is so specially iridescence that it looks gray in virtually all the NASA photos? Sounds exceptional. Why is it that debunkers stack exception upon incredible exception on top of each other?
Click to expand...

And the Chinese photos, and the Indian photos and the Japanese and Russian photos, and my own photos and the photos of everyone else who takes photos of the moon.

I've lost hope of you using the space between your ears, but why are you incapable of using your eyes?
 
threadworm said:
And the Chinese photos, and the Indian photos and the Japanese and Russian photos, and my own photos and the photos of everyone else who takes photos of the moon.

I've lost hope of you using the space between your ears, but why are you incapable of using your eyes?
Click to expand...

But the quote was from a mainstream author:

"One thing that stands out to my eye when looking at the photos is the brown color of the lunar surface soil or regolith." -- http://www.universetoday.com/108243/change-3-lander-beams-back-new-lunar-panorama-photos/

This shows that it's a mainstream view:

"Because Apollo visited six different moonscapes – all essentially gray – it makes me wonder if the color balance in the Chinese images might be off. Or did Chang’e 3 just happen to land on browner soils?"

The conspiracy spin was my addition. The fact remains that the lunar landscape looks brownish in the Chang'e 3 images. And the reason I immediately jumped to a conspiracy opinion is that I have pointed out the black-and-white lunar landscapes possible fakery in the NASA photos long before the Chang'e 3 mission.
 
Of course, NASA didn't have the superior Photoshop tools and skills :D of today, but something like this:

jeep_on_moon.jpg
 
Anders Lindman said:
But the quote was from a mainstream author:

"One thing that stands out to my eye when looking at the photos is the brown color of the lunar surface soil or regolith." -- http://www.universetoday.com/108243/change-3-lander-beams-back-new-lunar-panorama-photos/
Click to expand...

and?

This shows that it's a mainstream view:
Click to expand...

and? This automatically makes it wrong because?

"Because Apollo visited six different moonscapes – all essentially gray – it makes me wonder if the color balance in the Chinese images might be off. Or did Chang’e 3 just happen to land on browner soils?"

The conspiracy spin was my addition. The fact remains that the lunar landscape looks brownish in the Chang'e 3 images. And the reason I immediately jumped to a conspiracy opinion is that I have pointed out the black-and-white lunar landscapes possible fakery in the NASA photos long before the Chang'e 3 mission.
Click to expand...

No kidding - you added a conspiracy spin on something? Who saw that coming.

The reason you immediately jumped to a conspiracy opinion is because you're a self-confessed troll who is incapable of looking at the world normally.

Take a photo of the moon. What colour is it?
 
Anders Lindman said:
So the moon dust is so specially iridescence that it looks gray in virtually all the NASA photos? Sounds exceptional. Why is it that debunkers stack exception upon incredible exception on top of each other?
Click to expand...

Your incredulity is not a refutation. You asked for scientific examples of hue-altering reflections. You have no response other than to scoff.
 
Jay, I can understand your hunger for a conversation on this topic, but you must remember that Anders is the nutritional equivalent of eating packing peanuts. Even Anders does not take Anders seriously.
 
ApolloGnomon said:
Jay, I can understand your hunger for a conversation on this topic, but you must remember that Anders is the nutritional equivalent of eating packing peanuts. Even Anders does not take Anders seriously.
Click to expand...

Apollo I think it would be more equivalent to 'sucking' vacuum for nutrition.
 
Hans said:
Apollo I think it would be more equivalent to 'sucking' vacuum for nutrition.
Click to expand...

I rarely fail to be amused by things Anders Lindman attempts to argue. While the intellectual, factual, and logical content of his posts is often negligible, the sheer entertainment value is priceless.
 
True, like watching mindless cartoons. He and teh late Dr. Sox (the man who mistook his @@@ for a hat) are the only people I've ever had on 'ignore' here. I finally took everyone off the list when Dr. Sox died.
 
Anders Lindman said:
They didn't have Photoshop back then. How to airbrush for beginners -- www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5nRNcNM16g
Click to expand...

Actually, they did have photoshop-like capability then. The problem is that like all technology, the pixels were bigger then than they are now. In fact, each pixel was a yard across (not a meter across, as may be asserted by others).

The gigantic gantry at Langley was actually the tablet-and-stylus they used to fake the craters on all the pictures they shot in a nuclear test blast cavern in Siberia.


461432main_hyd-imp-basin-800.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom