MattusMaximus
Intellectual Gladiator
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2006
- Messages
- 15,948
It's a RICO case. Conspirators beware -- Save your skin; finger the boss.

It's a RICO case. Conspirators beware -- Save your skin; finger the boss.

It's a RICO case. Conspirators beware -- Save your skin; finger the boss.
One Republican and one Democrat; here in Illinois, our corruption is bipartisan![]()
You're right. Just because it happens in other places, we should ignore it in NJ![]()
Hate to say it, but this is the way the game is played in New Jersey,by both parties.
And I suspect the rules are similair in Illinois.
You're right. Just because it happens in other places, we should ignore it in NJ![]()
I read Dudalb's post and saw it more as an assertion of fact than a recommendation to ignore it. Am I missing something that should lead me to believe that Dudalb was trying to handwave it away.
It's not just you, I read it the same way. I read it that way because that technique is used consistently by people as a way of hand waving something away.I just read it that way. Perhaps I should give him the benefit of the doubt.
It's not just you, I read it the same way. I read it that way because that technique is used consistently by people as a way of hand waving something away.
I'm sure he really meant to type Rethuglican.![]()
It also points out selection bias, special pleading, etc.It's not just you, I read it the same way. I read it that way because that technique is used consistently by people as a way of hand waving something away.
“At the end of a big tour of ShopRite and meeting, she pulls me aside with no one else around and says that I need to move forward with the Rockefeller project. It is very important to the governor. The word is that you are against it and you need to move forward or we are not going to be able to help you. I know it’s not right — these things should not be connected — but they are, she says, and if you tell anyone, I will deny it.”
This so reminds me of a political cartoon from back in the day.
Ronald Reagan is holding a leash, at the end of which is Oliver North. Reagan's saying, "Gosh, I sure don't like those Sandinistas".
Next panel, Oliver dog is off out of view, wrecking **** up while Ron holds the leash whistling innocently, looking the other way, and in the final panel Ron turns around and feigns shock, "Ollie, what have you done? Bad Ollie!"
I assume by "you" you don't mean "me" because you have no clue what I care about.It happens all the time, so why pay attention to this case?
A month ago you couldn't care less how politics played out in New Jersey...
I agree. I think this actually worse than the bridge scandal, since it involves screwing hurricane victims out of needed help just to make sure some cronies got rich.
The Fox News crowd was in a tizzy, if you recall, over SOLYNDRA!!ELEVENTY!! And the accusation there was that Obama gave a loan to a company that was failing because they were cronies. If Obama had withheld stimulus money to a dying town because they wouldn't help prop up Solyndra, you'd have an analogy.
This is the apex of political corruption. That Sandy money was a gift to the people of New Jersey because they were in dire need. It wasn't a slush fund for the governor to use as a cudgel to get his friends sweet deals on unrelated financial schemes.
Ironically this is, in caricature form, exactly how a well-run government black op is supposed to go.
I've always respected North's willingness and commitment to taking the fall for Iran-Contra.
It will be interesting to see if Christie inspires similar loyalty.
What?!
I'm gone from the thread for a few days and look what happens. Wow.
Got any links on that?