Moderated What Caused the Plane Shaped Hole

[yankee451]

Would that be the one that's shaped like a plane and exactly the right size?

Yeah, that's the one. Did you glean that from the title? Shrewd.

 

[DGM]

Then please by all means do as I do and post a link or an example of what you're talking about!

links are included:

https://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/cmh/simulation/phase3/

 

[Robrob]

No one's stopping you from starting a technical discussion. You just can't figure out a way to make your silly jet match the damage highlighted in the video.

 

[Kid Eager]

The evidence is the gash. True Believer have much in common with most Truthers...neither clique wants to discuss the damage evidence.

Who knew you would be so alike?

Still waiting for your evidence. The claim of the cause of the gash is unsupported by anything. Even your photos contradict your claim, but you refuse or fail to comprehend it. The physics contradicts your claim.

But hey, continue to bang the table and feign outrage. It's keeping me amused.

 

[yankee451]

So tell us master technical man at what speed will the jetliner not penetrate the columns , let's say 5 km/h will the jetliner penetrate?

Lol

Now, now, now...stay on topic. East-west damage proves a north-south jet didn't cause it. If you are saying it did, then you'll need to adjust your calculations to address the question at hand. (Hint: its not a question of speed, its a question of trajectory)

 

[DGM]

Yeah, that's the one. Did you glean that from the title? Shrewd.

No, math, science and experience.

Glad to see you agree the gash is the right size.

 

[Kid Eager]

No one's stopping you from starting a technical discussion. You just can't figure out a way to make your silly jet match the damage highlighted in the video.

Another lie. You refused to engage in the discussion attempts initiated previously.

 

[yankee451]

Still waiting for your evidence. The claim of the cause of the gash is unsupported by anything. Even your photos contradict your claim, but you refuse or fail to comprehend it. The physics contradicts your claim.

But hey, continue to bang the table and feign outrage. It's keeping me amused.

I repeat, east-west damage from east side of the gash to the west side negates a jet striking from the north. If you say it did, show us all how.

 

[Hans]

Now, now, now...stay on topic. East-west damage proves a north-south jet didn't cause it. If you are saying it did, then you'll need to adjust your calculations to address the question at hand. (Hint: its not a question of speed, its a question of trajectory)

Avoidance: restated - what is the speed in km that will cause the jetliner to penetrate the steel columns?

You are trying to avoid a technical discussion aren't you?

Lol

 

[Kid Eager]

Now, now, now...stay on topic. East-west damage proves a north-south jet didn't cause it. If you are saying it did, then you'll need to adjust your calculations to address the question at hand. (Hint: its not a question of speed, its a question of trajectory)

This is your claim, but you have not provided evidence that a north south jet could not have caused it.

 

[yankee451]

Another lie. You refused to engage in the discussion attempts initiated previously.

I am not going to engage in of-topic discussions, so you might as well try to answer how a jet striking in a north-south trajectory would cause east-west damage.

Use physics. I dare you.

 

[Kid Eager]

I repeat, east-west damage from east side of the gash to the west side negates a jet striking from the north. If you say it did, show us all how.

Again, you make the claim that the damage could not have been caused by the jet. Where is the evidence for this claim?

 

[yankee451]

This is your claim, but you have not provided evidence that a north south jet could not have caused it.

I have. It's in the video. Have you watched it?

 

[NoahFence]

I am not going to engage in of-topic discussions, so you might as well try to answer how a jet striking in a north-south trajectory would cause east-west damage.

Use physics. I dare you.

You wouldn't even know it if he did.

 

[DGM]

Again, you make the claim that the damage could not have been caused by the jet. Where is the evidence for this claim?

I think it violates the MA for him to show you.

 

[yankee451]

Again, you make the claim that the damage could not have been caused by the jet. Where is the evidence for this claim?

All the wing damage bends in one direction, but not in the direction the wings were traveling. It's simple physics.

 

[Hans]

Another lie. You refused to engage in the discussion attempts initiated previously.

Of course classical troll behavior is to demand evidence then ignore it then later say it was never provided

 

[DGM]

All the wing damage bends in one direction, but not in the direction the wings were traveling. It's simple physics.

Really? Then you can post the numbers, simple, right?

Get on that.

 

[yankee451]

Avoidance: restated - what is the speed in km that will cause the jetliner to penetrate the steel columns?

You are trying to avoid a technical discussion aren't you?

Lol

No, you are avoiding discussing the east-west damage caused by a southbound jet. Why don't you ask what speed a southbound jet would need to reach to cause east-west damage from wingtip to wingtip?

 

[Robrob]

I am not going to engage in of-topic discussions, so you might as well try to answer how a jet striking in a north-south trajectory would cause east-westdamage.

Use physics. I dare you.

Claim of fact not supported by evidence.

I have. It's in the video. Have you watched it?

Argument by YouTube.

All the wing damage bends in one direction, but not in the direction the wings were traveling. It's simple physics.

Please elaborate on your belief a wing should bend forward when impacting a solid object at 500 mph?