macdoc
Philosopher
we don't have variable star - we have a plain jane main sequence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_sun
Changes in the magnetic field are not changes in radiation or luminousity.
We may get more CME's, lotsa auroras..no climate change from good Ol stable Sol
I suppose you are one of those thinking the earth swapping magnetic poles is a disaster in the making??
Do you understand how crazy Plutos orbit is???
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pluto_Orbit.gif
I'm really not sure you understand magnitudes....
Pluto is as whacky as they come but it's from the orbitals - not from any change in the sun....it actually cruises inside the orbit of Neptune at times.
http://www.universetoday.com/26464/plutos-atmosphere-boasts-methane-warmer-temps/
•••
oh yeah....some serious overturning you have to do boyo
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com...s-on-global-warming-9136-agree-one-disagrees/
and you can't even convince us....
The Sun today is roughly halfway through the most stable part of its life. It has not changed dramatically for four billion[a] years, and will remain fairly stable for four billion more
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_sun
Changes in the magnetic field are not changes in radiation or luminousity.
We may get more CME's, lotsa auroras..no climate change from good Ol stable Sol
I suppose you are one of those thinking the earth swapping magnetic poles is a disaster in the making??
Do you understand how crazy Plutos orbit is???
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pluto_Orbit.gif
Pluto’s orbit is also highly elliptical, stretching from 4.4 billion km to just over 7.3 billion km from the Sun. Doing the math again, that means the Sun goes from being 0.0012 to 0.0004 as bright as it is from Earth:
I'm really not sure you understand magnitudes....
Pluto is as whacky as they come but it's from the orbitals - not from any change in the sun....it actually cruises inside the orbit of Neptune at times.
http://www.universetoday.com/26464/plutos-atmosphere-boasts-methane-warmer-temps/
•••
oh yeah....some serious overturning you have to do boyo
About that consensus on global warming: 9136 agree, one disagrees.
By Ashutosh Jogalekar | January 10, 2014 | Comments5
The consensus about global warming among scientists (Image: James Powell)
I just want to highlight this illuminating infographic by James Powell in which, based on more than 2000 peer-reviewed publications, he counts the number of authors from November, 2012 to December, 2013 who explicitly deny global warming (that is, who propose a fundamentally different reason for temperature rise than anthropogenic CO2). The number is exactly one. In addition Powell also has helpful links to the abstracts and main text bodies of the relevant papers.
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com...s-on-global-warming-9136-agree-one-disagrees/
and you can't even convince us....
Last edited: