KMA - unless you start doing the same (making some sense and providing cites).
Thought so.
KMA - unless you start doing the same (making some sense and providing cites).
Had Meredith's body been moved some time (hours) after her death, then this of course would constitute a certain amount of evidence against Knox (and possibly Sollecito), since it's obviously easier to conceive of Knox (with or without Sollecito) having the means and the motivation to do such an act, as opposed to Guede.
I believe the glass pieces lineup because the rock was thrown from the inside with the shutter closed. The closed shutter stopped the glass in a line ,or soldiered on the sill if you will.The break in was staged to point away from entry through the front door.
Do most intruders worry that they haven't left a shred of outside debris in the room . Do they have to worry that the glass pattern of the break-in looks like an inside job? Have you not understood that while trying to recreate a typical break they look like amateur stagers? Are you bright?
No one has demonstrated how anyone could get in through the broken broken glass opening without leaving a fibre or speck of dirt anywhere.
I believe the glass pieces lineup because the rock was thrown from the inside with the shutter closed. The closed shutter stopped the glass in a line ,or soldiered on the sill if you will.The break in was staged to point away from entry through the front door.
Where is the damage to the inside of the outside shutter?
What would have stopped the glass from flying out when that huge 9 lb rock smashed through the glass and then the hit the shutters?
Where is the damage to the inside of the outside shutter?
What would have stopped the glass from flying out when that huge 9 lb rock smashed through the glass and then the hit the shutters?
Latching the inside shutter contained the throw, there is a chip of paint on the inner shutter visible in one of the photos. A point of the rock hit the closed shutter 5 inch or so a way from the glass windows leaving the chip before falling on the floor.
So the rock bounced off the inside of the outer shutters without leaving a nick then hit the outside of the inner shutter hard enough to leave a nick?Latching the inside shutter contained the throw, there is a chip of paint on the inner shutter visible in one of the photos. A point of the rock hit the closed shutter 5 inch or so a way from the glass windows leaving the chip before falling on the floor.
Briars;
Do you maintain that entry to the flat required, and was gained by climbing through the broken window-frame itself?
IT'S A SIMPLE QUESTION, GOD DAMN IT!
So the rock bounced off the inside of the outer shutters without leaving a nick then hit the outside of the inner shutter hard enough to leave a nick?
Of course not they are Italian windows that open like shutters. There still should be evidence on the outside wall , sill ,and not just undisturbed glass.Glass which should have some prints or evidence if painstakenly removed by hand.Normally I don't bother with impolite posts.. So just this once.
BTW, Briars, I meant to ask you something;
When you stated that;
"... No one has demonstrated how anyone could get in through the broken broken glass opening without leaving a fibre or speck of dirt anywhere",
I assumed you were being, erm, disingenuous, and attempting to maintain the pro-prosecution pretence that anything about the break-in is difficult or "unlikely".
I mean, it's pretty obvious that in most B&E's in which a pane of glass is broken, it's done in order to allow the intruder to reach in and open that window or door. Most people are aware of this.
Do you have a photo?No the rock went through the window then left a nick visible on the latched inside of the outside shutter.
Latching the inside shutter contained the throw, there is a chip of paint on the inner shutter visible in one of the photos. A point of the rock hit the closed shutter 5 inch or so a way from the glass windows leaving the chip before falling on the floor.