From Clayton Moore's 32 questions ignored for 273 days!
The cases in the vaccine court established by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act are not scientific studies.Clayton Moore: Cite the studies showing the links between the MMR jab and autism.
First asked 4 March 2013 - 273 days and counting!
...
Clayton Moore, Have you any idea what a citation to the scientific literature is?
Your continued citations of crank web sites says no!
!is a lie. The vaccine court has never ordered compensation for a case of autism.the federal government has quietly awarded families of autistic children damages as a result of vaccine injuries.
...
Since that time, despite the official ruling that there is no link between vaccines and autism, there have been at least 83 cases of autism among those compensated for vaccine-induced brain damage.
(my emphasis added)From 1988 until 8 January 2008, 5,263 claims relating to autism, and 2,865 non-autism claims, were made to the VICP. 925 of these claims, one autism-related (see previous rulings), were compensated, with 1,158 non-autism and 350 autism claims dismissed; awards (including attorney's fees) totaled $847 million.[6]
...
In 2008 the federal government agreed to award damages to the family of Hannah Poling, a girl who developed autistic-like symptoms after receiving a series of vaccines in a single day.[12] The vaccines given were DTaP, Hib, MMR, varicella, and inactivated polio. Poling was diagnosed months later with encephalopathy (brain disease) caused by a mitochondrial enzyme deficit, a mitochondrial disorder; it is not unusual for children with such deficits to develop neurologic signs between their first and second years.[11]
Over the Thanksgiving long weekend here in the US, there appeared a study that simply emphasizes once again that vaccines work. More importantly, it estimates how well they work. I’ve frequently said that vaccines are the medical intervention that have saved more lives than any other, and this study by investigators at the University of Pittsburgh’s graduate school of public health, published on Thanksgiving Day in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) and showing up on the news the day before provides yet more evidence to support my assertion.
That is the table used for the "on table" claims which are basically automatically granted compensation. The autism (and other) claims are "off table". The article is about the complaints of Mark Blaxill: "Blaxill is part of a group called the Canary Party, a coalition of parents who are pushing for changes to the system through political means". The Canary Party want autism to be placed "on table" despite the scientific evidence that vaccines do not cause autism. Blaxill expresses some paranoia and ignorance -If you read the table you'll see what it covers.
If you read the table you'll see what it covers. What it doesn't cover, obviously, is claims of vaccine-induced autism. That's what the article is complaining about. It also says Jenny McCarthy thinks autism isn't caused by vaccines, so I'm not going to bother fact-finding any more on this one.
The claims that autism is caused by vaccines have been completely disproven, right? We have all heard that claim, maybe most famously by actress and model Jenny McCarthy.
clayton
the evidence that MMR causes autism - none so far
the evidence that vaccines cause asthma - none so far
the evidence that vaccines are impacting on evolution - none so far
the evidence that US children have a specific US version of Autism - none so far
Probably the greatest proof that vaccines cause autism and a plethora of chronic unexplained maladies is that y'all blather there is no proof.
Probably the greatest proof that vaccines cause autism and a plethora of chronic unexplained maladies is that y'all blather there is no proof.
Perhaps the greatest proof that gibberish exists in the world is that statement, Clayton MooreProbably the greatest proof that vaccines cause autism and a plethora of chronic unexplained maladies is that y'all blather there is no proof.
If someone can't comprehend maybe they should recuse themselves.
Probably the greatest proof that vaccines cause autism and a plethora of chronic unexplained maladies is that y'all blather there is no proof.
If someone can't comprehend maybe they should recuse themselves.
You can start rescuing yourself any time now.
Probably the greatest proof that vaccines cause autism and a plethora of chronic unexplained maladies is that y'all blather there is no proof.
Probably the greatest proof that vaccines cause autism and a plethora of chronic unexplained maladies is that y'all blather there is no proof.
And before vaccinations, what was the occurrence of chronic unexplained maladies?
You know, like polio, small pox, measles, tuberculosis, rubella, etc...?
![]()
in claytons world they were helping to improve the gene pool by killing people
That's right, didn't the Nazis purposely infect concentration camp victims?