• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Re-Open the 9/11 Investigation Now

Childlike Empress said:
It seems that for certain regulars here it is more important to find anything to dismiss everything that goes contrary to the story they were fed than to even stop for a second and listen to what some people people like Graham think should be investigated did and do today. Admitting the own sickness is more difficult than admitting the one of state actors, for some reason. Some very obvious reason.
Click to expand...

ummmmmmmmmmm....This site/forum is dedicated to exposing fraud, BUSLH, non-truths and misinformation.

That's exactly what those "certain regulars" are doing.

Perhaps you shouldn't perpetuate WOO, no?
 
Seymour Butz said:
Quoted for CE.

Now let's see if there's any rebuttal. That is, IF the cognitive dissonance doesn't get too strong
Click to expand...


The psychotic drivel you quoted has nothing to do with the topic of this thread. It just tries to smear Senator Graham's take on the 9/11 investigation, coming from inside experience, with feverish stereotypes derived from what I, other "truthers" or whoever might have said or not.
 
Last edited:
CE trutherism is an absolute joke it clearly flies in the face of reality and constantly throws up ever more incredible, in the true sense of the word meaning lacking any creditability, explanations.
 
Dcdrac said:
CE trutherism is an absolute joke it clearly flies in the face of reality and constantly throws up ever more incredible, in the true sense of the word meaning lacking any creditability, explanations.
Click to expand...


Dcdrac mindless babbling in reaction to something one doesn't understand is a sign of mental weakness and should be avoided to be displayed publicly. The information you decided to eject your nonsense under is not mine, it is the one of a long-term senator involved with the initial investigation into 9/11. He wants it to be re-opened, I said my thing, you contributed nothing.
 
Childlike Empress said:
The psychotic drivel you quoted has nothing to do with the topic of this thread. It just tries to smear Senator Graham's take on the 9/11 investigation, coming from inside experience, with feverish stereotypes derived from what I, other "truthers" or whoever might have said or not.
Click to expand...

But you said two inconsistent things. One, that there was no plane that crashed at the Pentagon, and the the NoC theory proves that it is an inside jobby job.

Two, that Senator Graham wants an investigation into who provided material and monetary support to the 19 hijackers including the hijackers that crashed the plane into the Pentagon.

Do you think that CE is going to cotton to the fact that Graham does not support CE's silly theories about 9/11?

I'm guessing: NO.

Thanks for bumping the thread CE!
 
Childlike Empress said:
Dcdrac mindless babbling in reaction to something one doesn't understand is a sign of mental weakness and should be avoided to be displayed publicly. The information you decided to eject your nonsense under is not mine, it is the one of a long-term senator involved with the initial investigation into 9/11. He wants it to be re-opened, I said my thing, you contributed nothing.
Click to expand...
How are those CIT claims going? Refuted, or truth?
LOL, ... the Senator is selling books. Your CIT hopes and claims failed out of the box. Graham is selling a book, like the other guy you found, from Last Year, and posted now? This is how they do it, make up some fake headlines which are not supported in fact, and get face time to sell their books. It is called publicity, and then idiot fake news source like RT, or some TV station with a slow day publish the nonsense without support to push their agenda, or sell soap; as they fool people into thinking there is substance in the woo.

Falling for lies from CIT, then falling for fake headlines to sell books is a sign of what?

How much did the knives cost?

The psychotic drivel you quoted
Click to expand...
Is exactly what CIT produces. Maybe RT does too.
 
Last edited:
16.5 said:
But you said two inconsistent things. One, that there was no plane that crashed at the Pentagon, and the the NoC theory proves that it is an inside jobby job.

Two, that Senator Graham wants an investigation into who provided material and monetary support to the 19 hijackers including the hijackers that crashed the plane into the Pentagon.

Do you think that CE is going to cotton to the fact that Graham does not support CE's silly theories about 9/11?

I'm guessing: NO.

Thanks for bumping the thread CE!
Click to expand...

The poster known as "bill smith" liked to post mutually exclusive theories.
Seems CE may be adopting a similar bent.

Its the old " throw a lot of mud at a wall and some of it might stick" strategy.
 
9/11 truth is a bad joke, it has been completely shown to be utterly bogus, actual professionals who know their trade on this forum alone have repeatedly blown holes in its insane premise.
 
Dcdrac said:
9/11 truth is a bad joke, it has been completely shown to be utterly bogus, actual professionals who know their trade on this forum alone have repeatedly blown holes in its insane premise.
Click to expand...

Er... no! I *still* haven't seen a realistice explanation for free fall of the towers.
 
Childlike Empress said:
Dcdrac mindless babbling in reaction to something one doesn't understand is a sign of mental weakness and should be avoided to be displayed publicly.
Click to expand...

Here we go again. Skeptics being accused of not believing because they "don't understand".

Believe it or not, we skeptics understand very well such things as self-delusion, confirmation bias, poor cognitive skills, and multitude other things that are more than sufficient to explain the tendency of many people to believe in nonsense.
 
Dcdrac said:
9/11 truth is a bad joke, it has been completely shown to be utterly bogus, actual professionals who know their trade on this forum alone have repeatedly blown holes in its insane premise.
Click to expand...

Wait...they have a premise now?

What a breakthrough! When did this happen?

;)
 
aggle-rithm said:
Wait...they have a premise now?

What a breakthrough! When did this happen?

;)
Click to expand...

The premise is the evil gubmint did it to have an excuse to invade Afghanistan which would have happened anyway regardless of whether terrorists attacked the twin towers or not.

trutherism is a classic example of making castles out of air.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom