kevsta
RBL CHeck Failed
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2007
- Messages
- 4,016
Currency isn't inherently inflationary
how many have gained significant value in the last 100 years?
Currency isn't inherently inflationary
how many have gained significant value in the last 100 years?
This has nothing to do with the theoretical inherent quality of currency.
It is the amount of currency in circulation that determines the value or I should say purchasing power.
FTFY (bold)
indeed. theory is very different from the real world facts huh.
What is your point? Are you saying the silver currency that was used in the US lost it's value? How about the gold coins that were taken out of circulation before the silver was, they lost value?
hmm. interesting that your only examples are of ex "hard money" currencies.
my point is that there aren't any of these (officially at least) any more for the last 40 years, and hence, yes all official currencies are now inherently inflationary in practice.
So in this regard Bitcoin and its ilk are obviously not behaving very much like "real" currencies at all because they all devalue over time.
This has nothing to do with the inherent quality of currency.
You asked for currencies in the last 100 years, those qualify.
Now I am afraid I am going to have to dispute your most recent claim with the example of the penny which costs two cents to make even with it being 95% zinc. Pre 1983 pennies are worth about two cents at the current price of copper.
Bitcoin isn't a currency, it's a speculation. If it were a currency, it would have an accepted face value. It doesn't. I don't find prices in BC on the internet for items such as a Aston-Martin DB9. That price is in $ and it has been the same for as long as the ad has been placed. Unfortunately, it would have to vary by the second if it were priced in BC. Ergo, BC is a speculation and not a currency.
There's a £60m bitcoin heist being attempted apparently.
http://www.newstatesman.com/future-...ng-down-right-now-and-you-can-watch-real-time
Nice. Tell me again why I should invest in this?
The first thing you should do is to moderate off topic posts right off this thread. This thread is entitled "How to use bitcoin".
Then, possibly, you might be able to actually learn a few things and at that point, you could answer your own question.
Just saying.
er, no, only that's one currency and you picking a point when it was still anchored to the monetary metals proves my point.
Im not talking about individual coin costs, I'm talking about the currency.
or are you trying to tell me that the USD has lost no purchasing power since 1983?
no? how about if there were another national currency that did keep going up consistently, inversely to the rest. just because you cant take it and spend it on Doughnuts in Walmart doesn't mean its not a currency somewhere.
what would stop you storing your money in the superior currency and exchanging it for the inferior stuff as required?
It has a very strong tendency to inflate.
Currency isn't inherently inflationary. The amount of currency in relation to the value of goods and services produced is what can be inflationary.
Please see the whole original post.
The first thing you should do is to moderate off topic posts right off this thread. This thread is entitled "How to use bitcoin".
Then, possibly, you might be able to actually learn a few things and at that point, you could answer your own question.
Just saying.
Why ? My statement was true, and I'm making sure that you are aware of it.
No need to be antagonistic, even if we're on the internet.
Please see the whole original post.
For some reason kvesta decided to shorten my statement.
Actually you never made a point. You just responded to a post I made in a way that had nothing to do with the post that I made.
What was antagonistic?
Do you acknowledge my point or not ?