• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

9/11 No Planers who claim no planes struck the WTC, and think all the video is fake

Mikeys said:
Why would anyone honest want to fake faked videos? I would imagine there are plenty faked fakes on you tube. I am sure we both can agree on the answer.
Click to expand...

Indeed.The only people who fake 911 videos are mendacious twoofers. You've got something right at last. Well done. Faked fakes is a tautology, by the way.
 
Mikeys said:
It could't be denser and was filled with concrete. It had no way to run anywhere if hit by no matter what without taking the rest of the portion of the building with itself.

I don't calculate what will happen when I hit one of my fingers with a hammer. I just don't do it on purpose.
Click to expand...

Must have been uncomfortable for the occupants.
 
LogicallyYours said:
Excuse me???? What does the ratio have to do with it? What is your education level regarding physics?

Why aren't the architects of the WTC exposing the fraud of the events of 9/11?
Click to expand...

Since the sliced object is a frame the size of the cutter is important.
 
dafydd said:
That is not English. What are you trying to say? Do you expect a large fast moving object to collide with a building and dematerialize through the wall? The planes that crashed into the Twin Towers did take portions of the buildings with them, didn't you notice that or have you been watching crazy faked YooToob vids where no damage was done during the crashes?
Click to expand...

I'm getting the impression of a building dodging out of the way like a cartoon.
 
Mikeys said:
Since the sliced object is a frame the size of the cutter is important.
Click to expand...

That gibberish has nothing to do with the question you were asked. None of your 'answers' ever do address the question that you were asked. If you want to keep on entertaining us then go ahead. Next one-liner please.
 
tsig said:
I'm getting the impression of a building dodging out of the way like a cartoon.
Click to expand...

Cartoon physics is all that twoofers have. None of them have had a physics lesson in their lives, apparently. Mikeys refuses to divulge where he studied physics.
 
Mikeys said:
Since the sliced object is a frame the size of the cutter is important.
Click to expand...

No, it doesn't. The point you are attempting to make is, the plane(s) lack the mass and physical properties to penetrate/breach the outside structure/skin of the WTC Towers.

Tell me how the pumpkin penetrating both side of a fiberglass boat is not a valid?

Use your science words. (physics)
 
LogicallyYours said:
Tell me how the pumpkin penetrating both side of a fiberglass boat is not a valid?

Use your science words. (physics)
Click to expand...

Show us the maths, Mikeys. Just saying it does not make it true.Which laws of physics are you using?
 
Last edited:
dafydd said:
That gibberish has nothing to do with the question you were asked. None of your 'answers' ever do address the question that you were asked. If you want to keep on entertaining us then go ahead. Next one-liner please.
Click to expand...

Do you know what ratio is? Dafyyd is bigger than a goat but not as big as an elephant. What Dafydd can do to a goat he can not do to an elephant.
 
Mikeys said:
Do you know what ratio is? Dafyyd is bigger than a goat but not as big as an elephant. What Dafydd can do to a goat he can not do to an elephant.
Click to expand...

You never had his curried elephant, then. Say what you like about Dafydd (I see you started already) but he does not lack ambition.

Sticking with the animal theme, you never yet answered my question from earlier: who gets called "birdwatchers" and by what "profession" are they called that?
 
LogicallyYours said:
No, it doesn't. The point you are attempting to make is, the plane(s) lack the mass and physical properties to penetrate/breach the outside structure/skin of the WTC Towers.

Tell me how the pumpkin penetrating both side of a fiberglass boat is not a valid?

Use your science words. (physics)
Click to expand...

Tell me the name of the boat, the size of the pumpkin and the place it went in and went out. I will tell you if it is possible.
 
Mikeys said:
I've seen that picture already. It depicts the last stand of plane huggers. Sunset fits nicely.
Click to expand...

Do you have anything of your own to say about 9/11? Everything you say sounds like troofer copypasta. (Except for the elephant, but sadly that didn't actually address 9/11.)
 
Mikeys said:
Tell me the name of the boat, the size of the pumpkin and the place it went in and went out. I will tell you if it is possible.
Click to expand...

How about I show you?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfG0fYPqj6UDo

Do you know what makes this possible???

Now, do the laws of physic suspend when a jetliner traveling almost 500mph crash in to a glass and concrete skinned skyscrapper?
 
Last edited:
mikeys your call sign is there is no escape from the truth but that seems to be exactly what you have been doing, escaping from the truth.
 
LogicallyYours said:
How about I show you?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfG0fYPqj6UDo
Click to expand...

Obscure video, nothing to talk about. Best to start with something that is clearly visible to avoid going in circles for wrong reasons.
Do you know what makes this possible???

Now, do the laws of physic suspend when a jetliner traveling almost 500mph crash in to a glass and concrete skinned skyscrapper?
Click to expand...
We are in actuality talking about fully framed structure. I don't know why you insist that your plane encountered nothing else. The whole tower would push against a plane with full force. There was no room for a plane there. It couldn't go in. Theoretically, it would take massive energy of the Boeing size at incredible speed to go right across or collapse the top. Nothing of the size could just get in and kind of curve a hollow imprint inside.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom