I apologise for my logging back into here, I promised myself I wouldn't. I can't bear to read some comments, and I don't wish to fuel any fire. I do give full marks to Mr Roberts for trying to reply to a few comments. I find the different view points interesting/plausible. Matching the voices should not prove difficult. I am quite alive and I do have recordings going back a decade with my Father's voice present.
I don't mind what Mr Roberts has to say, or what he wishes to point out. I update him as I do the others. I sort of get the feeling that he's mentioned the diamonds and the Grimbsy clip here so I cannot retract my suspicions of my latest findings. I really don't know how he's coping but I imagine it's been a horrible year to digest (on top of his own problems) I explain that it is a sceptics job to look for the objectives/alternatives etc, and to ignore any medical evaluations, wrong assumptions etc.
I think Marplots had an interesting point. Possibly refering to my hearing altering to a point where I cannot recognise a voice, or familiar voices anymore. Quite plausible, and something I actually considered. Many others here were hearing words/sentences, where Alderbank could not. I'll confess I played Alderbank an audio file with a real voice on it, loud enough to be heard. It was not recognised as a voice at all. I then played him a real voice that he was familiar with, and it was of course recognised as a voice. (Sorry Alderbank, you have been a good sport and once Rev E has settled in her house-move, it's all systems go if you are still interested to observe)
I don't know if Alderbank mentioned hearing a short sentence in a chipmonk-like voice saying "Hi Katie it's Julie" It was loud enough but did he said it did not count for anything because the voice was chipmonk-like. I have stressed that their voices alter. They speed up, slow down, can be full of static, or very clear. As they are not actually being recorded as such, uploading to Box.com was a waste of time as all it did was distort the files (as it did with Jfishers file when he uploaded it to email)
I also think XP had a good point. How many youtube uploads will one find a voice calling out "TRACEY" or of similar sounding. I've downloaded 3 that I know of. 2 contain my full name, and again mentions Billy.
I'm clueless regarding diamond rings for now, so it's hardly worth a mention until I can identify what has actually happened to it.
I'm also comfortably back home after hearing that the spirits blew my etheral attacker to bits. Interesting article "Alien life found above the skies over Chester" I'm not saying anything more than it certainly got me thinking.
Regarding the Grimbsy clip, it is my voice alongside my Father's voice. I couldn't have wished for a more deserving piece of evidence. Although they appear as "bystanders" to the unsuspecting listener, it is indeed my Father, and bearing good news too. I emailled the uploader, and noticed the clip had been uploaded 8 months previous, and also by 2 different uploaders. I have had a response from youtube members, who are aware that something odd is happening within their recordings. I caught one scaremongerer out who stages his hotel room to appear "haunted" He uses the same silent audio for 3 separate incidences caught on camera. So when one clip altered, it altered all 3 of his clips. Busted
Shouldn't actually mess about with the paranormal at all.
Alice Fruitcake, I am neither mental, dramatic nor trying to pull the wool over anyones eyes. I would prefer it that my Father et'al were R.I.P, but it isn't the case, and the reason why I press on. We have a right to know whats going on. My church pinpoints my daughter as being responsible for the hauntings, whilst another denomination tells me it's satan playing tricks.
Regarding a contest. If my Father is correct, it may close before my challenge is accepted. I await further replies but it isn't looking too good.
Regarding the GP. His letter explains "how it was" in February. If this letter was to be updated, I believe it would not be as vague today. Since Mr Roberts computer altered in June, it isn't "noise suggestive of words" anymore. Sentences are heard in my Fathers voice. It also isn't "2 images, one good and one bad" there are over 60 now. I found their latest images incredible. Paredolia or not, the images related to everything I'm hearing, experiencing and requesting. A GP that takes the time to check out the evidence offered before suggesting any kind of therapy, is a good GP in my eyes.
