Looking for Skeptics

[AdMan]

Its irrelevant its cheap a fake, its the audio at at 20 seconds it shouts out Tracey loud a clear. If you remember saying, I listen in to the recordings before Tracey plays them, and there was definitely no Tracey at 20 seconds.

And there still isn't. You and Tracey and whoever else buys into this are just deluding yourselves.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

Its irrelevant its cheap a fake, its the audio at at 20 seconds it shouts out Tracey loud a clear.

Don't be ridiculous. The words are "Can you see?", not "Tracey".

 

[scrappy]

And there still isn't. You and Tracey and whoever else buys into this are just deluding yourselves.

I can hear Tracey loud and clear at 20 seconds, and that's no delusion. It wasn't there first time round that's a fact of many.

 

[xterra]

[...] If you remember saying, I listen in to the recordings before Tracey plays them, and there was definitely no Tracey at 20 seconds.

scrappy, I am trying to understand the sequence of events you describe. There are several possibilities here:

First, it could be that you downloaded it to your computer, listened, heard nothing. Then flaccon downloaded it to her computer and heard "Tracey".

And then either (a) the copy you already had on your computer changed or (b) you again downloaded it from the website to your computer, and this time heard "Tracey."

Or (c) you listened to the recording on flaccon's computer after she did, and this time heard "Tracey."

Is one of these correct? If not, please describe the sequence more specifically.

Thank you,

xterra

 

[scrappy]

Don't be ridiculous. The words are "Can you see?", not "Tracey".

UNBELIEVABLE. The contest she has entered will decide.

 

[AdMan]

I can hear Tracey loud and clear at 20 seconds, and that's no delusion. It wasn't there first time round that's a fact of many.

And now the voice has apparently uploaded to YouTube?

As has been pointed out, it's "Can you see?", not "Tracey!"

 

[Dissolution]

I can hear Tracey loud and clear at 20 seconds, and that's no delusion. It wasn't there first time round that's a fact of many.

It doesn't say Tracey.
Put a comment on the clip asking what other people hear without mentioning her name and I can guarantee that nobody will come back with the answer that you're giving.
I'm struggling to see how anyone could even claim that they're hearing that.

 

[AdMan]

UNBELIEVABLE. The contest she has entered will decide.

What contest is that?

 

[scrappy]

And now the voice has apparently uploaded to YouTube?

As has been pointed out, it's "Can you see?", not "Tracey!"

There are 2 syllables not 3. TRA-CEY.

 

[Professor Yaffle]

Sounds like "Can't you see?" or "Can't you see it?" to me. Notice that the stress is on the "see", which it is not when you say the name Tracey.

 

[xterra]

scrappy,

Are you going to help me understand the sequence of events, or shall I just guess what you meant?

 

[scrappy]

scrappy, I am trying to understand the sequence of events you describe. There are several possibilities here:

First, it could be that you downloaded it to your computer, listened, heard nothing. Then flaccon downloaded it to her computer and heard "Tracey".

And then either (a) the copy you already had on your computer changed or (b) you again downloaded it from the website to your computer, and this time heard "Tracey."

Or (c) you listened to the recording on flaccon's computer after she did, and this time heard "Tracey."

Is one of these correct? If not, please describe the sequence more specifically.

Thank you,

xterra

Sequence of events were this,
I listen into a youtube clip on my computer here in Nottingham. I play it over the phone so Tracey hears it too. She then plays the clip on her computer in Chester. It is then that words are added. When I replay the same clip, there are words/sentences that were not there previously. There are many clips we did this with, some speak her full name too.

She's only entered into the challenge out of desperation. she doesn't care for the money. The spirits stepped up another gear last week, wrecked her diamond rings. Yet another claim made by the spirits, but this one cant be explained away as paredolia.

 

[xterra]

Sequence of events were this,
I listen into a youtube clip on my computer here in Nottingham. I play it over the phone so Tracey hears it too. She then plays the clip on her computer in Chester. It is then that words are added. When I replay the same clip, thee are words/sentences that were not there previously. There are many clips we did this with, some speak her full name too.

(my emphasis)


Does "the same clip" mean

A. the version on your computer, or

B. the version on her computer or

C. the one on the youtube clip on youtube?

Just type the letter -- unless all three alternatives are incorrect.

 

[Pixel42]

Whatever he's saying it definitely starts with a 'C' or 'K', not a 'T'. If I heard that bit on its own I might be persuaded that he's saying 'Casey' but with the benefit of the context it's obviously 'Can you see', said so fast and in such excitement that the middle syllable all but disappears.

 

[xterra]

Whatever he's saying it definitely starts with a 'C' or 'K', not a 'T'. If I heard that bit on its own I might be persuaded that he's saying 'Casey' but with the benefit of the context it's obviously 'Can you see', said so fast and in such excitement that the middle syllable all but disappears.

Furthermore, it is "can you see" in an Indian or Pakistani accent.

(Does this mean that spirits change ethnicity from what they were in life? Interesting idea, isn't it?)

BTW, it appeared to me that the video showed a radio-controlled model aircraft.

 

[scrappy]

(my emphasis)


Does "the same clip" mean

A. the version on your computer, or

B. the version on her computer or

C. the one on the youtube clip on youtube?

Just type the letter -- unless all three alternatives are incorrect.

Sorry (confusing) I'll try that again.
A. Tracey picks out a random clip on youtube.
B. She sends me the link and I play it through my computer. When I am certain that there are no suspicious background words, Tracey then listens to it on her computer.
C) Once its played through her computer, the words appear.
D) When I replay it, there are obvious words being spoken that were not there previously.



There are people over on youtube leaving comments such as "strange, that audio wasn't there first time I heard this" also there is a comment from a bloke in Brazil who has commented that their people are now in touch with whatever lurks in our skies these days, he stipulated that these voices are targeting the people, and not the gov't's.

 

[Vortigern99]

Even if we accept for the sake of discussion that the clip says "Tracey"...

SO WHAT?

There are hundreds of thousands of people named Tracey in the world. This doesn't mean spirits have invaded a) your computer or b) your mind.

 

[scrappy]

Whatever he's saying it definitely starts with a 'C' or 'K', not a 'T'. If I heard that bit on its own I might be persuaded that he's saying 'Casey' but with the benefit of the context it's obviously 'Can you see', said so fast and in such excitement that the middle syllable all but disappears.

It wasn't there first time I played it, and its a different sound to the blokes voices. A syllable hasn't just disappeared, but 2 have appeared.

 

[scrappy]

Furthermore, it is "can you see" in an Indian or Pakistani accent.

(Does this mean that spirits change ethnicity from what they were in life? Interesting idea, isn't it?)

BTW, it appeared to me that the video showed a radio-controlled model aircraft.

There isn't a syllable there that sounds like " Can - You" it is also shouted decibels louder than the Pakistani at his most excited. As it is shouted, the 2 blokes are already making a noise, if only breathing.

 

[Alice Shortcake]

The spirits stepped up another gear last week, wrecked her diamond rings. Yet another claim made by the spirits, but this one cant be explained away as paredolia.

Could you go into more detail about this?