Having hight disturbance fines is consistent with being a honor student at the University of Washington?
Fines, plural?

Don't stretch the evidence, my friend. Remember, it's you who said: . . .
you make a claim, you word such claim as if it was a fact, and you have no interesting in knowing if it's true or not.
This devious propaganda is your activity.
Abandoning university courses; then, decide move to another city without any university-planned study course, starting unrelated attending of a non-university institute by your own choice instead of following academic percourses, is that typical of a honor student?
Um . . . this is an odd way to describe a very common junior year practice here in the USA, which we usually refer to as
studying abroad.
Again, you:
. . . you make a claim, you word such claim as if it was a fact, and you have no interesting in knowing if it's true or not.
This devious propaganda is your activity.
Leaving your job at the BUndestag after the first day of work, is that typical of a honor student?
Devious. Propaganda. Etc. People do leave jobs that aren't a good fit, and smart people leave them right away. What were you suggesting, I wonder?
Drifting to Perugia attracted by the legend of the local student party life, without even knowing which institute is the university in that city, is that typical of honor students?
Now that's just silly. She enrolled through a University of Washington program before she left . . . are you deviously suggesting that she just randomly went to Perugia because it was a known party town? That would be sort of like making a claim as if it were a fact with no interest in its actual truth.
Fail to perform at work because of wasting time on flirting with clients, as Knox used to do while hired at Lumumba's pub, is that typical of honor students?
And yet he didn't fire her. Look at devious you, suggesting defamatory propaganda.
You see, it's so a habitual claim to hear Knox be called a honor student, that one even may forget to ask evidence of it. Is there any evidence, by the way, that Knox was ever a honor student at the University of Washington?
You'll be glad to hear that she's enrolled there even now, though I think grades are not given out to random devious internet personalities who suggest that she's lying about this. It's neither more nor less important, is it, than Stefanoni's credentials?
Well, apart the number (that was given by Knox herself, anyway) we have testimonies which describe her way of building relations.
What a dark, devious suggestion. Do you know something you aren't telling us? Or are you just insinuating claims as if they were fact?
Well, she gave her phone number to a drug dealer for a reason, I suppose.
And here I've been under the impression that you were such a strictly logical man. How do you know she gave her number to him? Has no one ever passed along a phone number to another person? Does your phone not have a "share" button on the contact list? Never mind. I see that we're still busy with devious propaganda.
They also exchanged phone rings the day prior to the murder and the following day. I don't want to necessarily infer that the reason for the drug dealer having her number was that she wanted to buy drugs.
Yes, because that would be wrong! For all you know, she got a call from a number she didn't recognize and called it back to see who was bothering her. But that wouldn't forward the agenda of making defamatory claims as if they were fact.
The scenarios on possible reasons for attending a drug dealer are not in a very big number anyway. I tend to exclude shared academic interests.
You tend to exclude shared academic interests! That's by far my favorite line of this post. A perfect blend of snooty intellectual and disapproving older man.
You ought to stick to muddling up DNA records conversations, Machiavelli. You're much less transparent in that mode.