• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

If Sunlight is quantity of SUN?/Is the Sun Alive?

Haven't you learned anything here, Kumar?
Photons without energy don't exist.
Why not think dynamically and review the definitions of a photon?

Pls tell me complete cycle of photons. I think it was somewhat told but that is not satisfactory to me.
 
Routine studies would at least teach you the basic concepts, and serve as a foundation for further understanding.

It's impossible to gain an advanced understanding of any subject without first understanding the basic concepts.

If you're not willing to make the effort to understand the basic concepts, then you're not truly willing to learn.



That question can't be answered because the question makes no sense. You're spouting unintelligible gibberish.

I shall adjust dynamic understanding in routine understanding later on. It I shall read the routine I may not be able to get dynamic new clues. For example, if you want to take sweet thing and if you take white sugar though your purpose is served but you can be deviated from taking natural sweet ones. fruits, sugar cane etc.

Kumar, no dynamic thinking is possible by someone who doesn't understand the difference between 'having zero rest mass' and 'being at zero rest mass.'
If you want to find dynamic new clues, try learning to express yourself so it's possible to understand your direction.
 
Pls tell me complete cycle of photons. I think it was somewhat told but that is not satisfactory to me.
Why not read the definitions of a photon in in your own language, Kumar.
If you haven't understood the explanations you've been given here nor been able to comprehend the many articles whose links have been posted, don't you think that means your thinking is by no means dynamic?
 
Height is one property of people. Whether EM energy is property of of photons? Even if so, where is photon(people in your example)?

:confused:

Try rephrasing the question so that we can understand what you're trying to ask.

Your above telling is somewhat indicating that height is all of people--so confusing to me.


Height is one property that people have.
All people have height.
No people have no height.
People also have properties other than height.

What part of this is confusing to you?

Energy is one property that photons have.
All photons have energy.
No photons have no energy.
Photons also have properties other than energy.

What part of this is confusing to you?

What do you mean by a dead photon, Kumar?

If photons are not EM energy, then photons without EM energy.


Photons with no energy don't exist.
People with no height don't exist.
 
Sorry and I regret for your odd thinking. On brainstorming many odds and evens can come, but we should neither be egoistic nor deviate from those. We are gifited with fight or flight, but where we can fight we shoud otherwise fly..
Are you saying that you fly from understanding the definition of a photon?
There no fight here, just a number of posters trying to get you to learn about photons.
 
Kumar, no dynamic thinking is possible by someone who doesn't understand the difference between 'having zero rest mass' and 'being at zero rest mass.'
If you want to find dynamic new clues, try learning to express yourself so it's possible to understand your direction.

I think, it can mosty be thought by my type. It is difficult to find new things in routines.
 
Why not read the definitions of a photon in in your own language, Kumar.
If you haven't understood the explanations you've been given here nor been able to comprehend the many articles whose links have been posted, don't you think that means your thinking is by no means dynamic?

I think, you told better than that. Can I get dead or somewhat EM energy less photons from those routines? Either we should accept that photons are non existant and they are just discrete particles of EM energy or they should hold some independent entity. Ok it was told that two photons can make a real mass. Let us take millions of photons which make real mass or say part of real world. All shoud be traveling at speed of light. If so, how we can see stable mass just like out computer?
 
I think, it can mosty be thought by my type.


Your type is doomed to be wrong, because you habitually ignore everything that yoou are told.

Anyway, back to more important matters. What do you think would happen to a photon if fowl played with it like chicken/football?
 
:confused:

Try rephrasing the question so that we can understand what you're trying to ask.




Height is one property that people have.
All people have height.
No people have no height.
People also have properties other than height.

What part of this is confusing to you?

Energy is one property that photons have.
All photons have energy.
No photons have no energy.
Photons also have properties other than energy.

What part of this is confusing to you?




Photons with no energy don't exist.
People with no height don't exist.

I think dead and lying idle people are not refered by their height. Flat water if stired make wave. After some time water again become flat. In this example I think made waves are photons like, energy transffered on string to distant paces is EM energy. But still flat water was there at start and at end. I want to understand this flat water.
 
Your type is doomed to be wrong, because you habitually ignore everything that yoou are told.

Anyway, back to more important matters. What do you think would happen to a photon if fowl played with it like chicken/football?

I am veg. I coud not understand its sense.
 
I think, you told better than that. Can I get dead or somewhat EM energy less photons from those routines? Either we should accept that photons are non existant and they are just discrete particles of EM energy or they should hold some independent entity. Ok it was told that two photons can make a real mass. Let us take millions of photons which make real mass or say part of real world. All shoud be traveling at speed of light. If so, how we can see stable mass just like out computer?


:notm

You cannot get "dead photons" because photons have zero rest mass, and you cannot get "somewhat EM energy less photons" because a photon either exists or it doesn't. A photon with "somewhat less energy" would not be the same photon with less energy, it would be a photon of a longer wavelength.

Photons have zero rest mass. Even if you have millions of them they will still have zero rest mass, because 0+0=0.

I think we might be better off waiting until the chicken has finished playing football/photon and try to explain this to the chicken (or even the football or the photon).
 
I am veg. I coud not understand its sense.


There may be some truth in this. I've just tried to explain that photons have zero rest mass to a cabbage, and it understood the concept at least as well as you do.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom