jargon buster
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 4,773
Yes it is, they were made arguidos because the police believed they were responsible for the crime, so instead of you just making up stuff like "Its the same in the uk and portugal" which it isnt.
Provide proof that the police didn't think they were really suspects and it was a formal thing.
The proof it wasnt formal was the person who made the decision to make them arguidos clearly thought they were responsible for her disappearence hence the book he wrote.
Yep, because its obvious to think of that if you discover a child missing.This means the last person who touched it would have been the person who abducted her. Yet instead of putting it into a bag and sending it to a research lab in the hopes that DNA might be found, she washed it.
You are the one hovering around "acceptable" I'm talking REALITY. It's common knowledge and I certainly think DOCTORS would be aware of this.
They left her another night and she woke up crying. Why is it beyond the realm of possibility to you that doctors would consider giving her a bit of benadryl.
You make it sound like I'm saying they injected her with medical level sedation ala Michael Jackson.
It's a small pink pill. Bite it in half, give it to her with juice. Easy peasy.
How does this help in finding out what happened that night?
You don't think so? Do you have kids btw? I'm just curious?
And go out and get bladdered with your friends whilst on holiday!!!
They are not at home in the next bedroom, why do you keep missing the point, Im beginning to think you are trolling.![]()
... But it always puzzled me why a mother would say that the cuddle cat had been placed on a shelf and this is why she knew Madeline had been abducted.
It was too high for Madeline to reach.
This means the last person who touched it would have been the person who abducted her. Yet instead of putting it into a bag and sending it to a research lab in the hopes that DNA might be found, she washed it.
I would rather keep my private life private thanks.
If their was prior surveillance by a child snatcher then the McCanns may have been targetted as parents who regularly left their children alone in the evenings.
So was someone seen nearby on previous nights whose presence cannot be accounted for?
You keep writing that like its normal/acceptable behaviour to sedate children.
So then No.
I'm only asking because you seem to be completely unaware of this. I have three kids 19, 18 and 13. Believe me, it's common knowledge that parents use benadryl to sedate their kids. It's wrong but they do it.
And go out and get bladdered with your friends whilst on holiday!!!
They are not at home in the next bedroom, why do you keep missing the point, Im beginning to think you are trolling.![]()
Very tired parents with children who cannot get to sleep will try medication such as calpol or anotger is Ashtons &Parsons powder for children with teething pain.
Your hyperbole is not helpful in getting a true understanding of how it is to have kids who are bad sleepers.
More hyperbole in as much as bladdered to me means very drunk, which the McCanns were not.
All it needed was someone who had seen them with the kids during the day to come across them at night and watch them keep nipping back to the room to work out what the situation was, it wouldn't need any more surveillance than that.
No but once when my son was very small he had a cold, and he was sneezing and coughing and crying and couldn't sleep. It was 3 am and I was desperate and gave him a half cap (not the cup, the actual cap) of Nyquil and he was out like a light.
I went to the pharmacist the next day in a panic checking if it was ok. They laughed at me and told me that in ye old days it was whiskey. LOL