Merged Newtown (Sandy Hook) Shooting Conspiracy Theories In 3..2..1....

phiwum said:
My guess (and it's only a guess) is that the evidence is the ME said the victim was shot with the rifle, and the rifle was (allegedly) still in the trunk of the car. Early reports misplaced the rifle and great CT hay was made of it.
Click to expand...

Ahh, that's probably it. It's a perennial CT obsession, any variation or update to a crime report is "evidence" of, something.
 
No doubt the Sandy Hook Conspiracy Kooks are going to go crazy over the DC Navy Yards Shootings.
 
Bishop said:
They already have.
Click to expand...

I remember seeing a quote here from a CT site where a CTer said something like "you should start from the assumption that any attack is a false flag attack".

EDIT:

From the Stundies thread:

Horatius said:
Hell, these days it's a negative delay; there are plenty of nuts out there pre-emptively declaring that all such attacks are false flags, no matter the circumstances.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Clayton Moore said:
http://www.myfoxny.com/story/23691596/contractors-forbidden-to-disclose-newtown-school-information

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/public-access-barred-newtown-school-demolition-20572607


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/...88286.html?utm_hp_ref=newtown-school-shooting
Click to expand...

Wel since CM cant be bothered to explain his posting:

1 is an article that contractors working on demolishing Sandy Hook Elementary have been barred from taking pictures or disclosing information about the site.

2 is pretty much the same, adding that the public is barred from the site.

3 is about whether or not a Connecticut law can be used to prohibit the release of the 911 call from the school.

Now to anyone with a shred of empathy for the victims and their families the reason for all of the above seems rather obvious; to protect them from seeing images of bullet holes plastered all over Youtube and ghouls selling 'souvenirs' on E-Bay or having to listen to that call being played endlessly on the media.

Of course as usual CM hasn't properly read the articles or he would have noticed that in 3 it appears the law doesn't apply and the recording will be released.
 
Clayton Moore said:
Somebody Is Hiding Something
Click to expand...

Well except that if you read your own third link you would see they actually aren't hiding something. As for the first two yes they are and I wholeheartedly approve of the decision. The victims and the relatives have had to put up with quite enough ghouls without having more of them pawing over the site of the tragedy looking for some bloodstained concrete as a souvenir.
 
Clayton, why do you feel you are entitled to 100% of the evidence in a case? If this was an inside job, then why allow the news about contractors not being able to take pictures slip out in the media?
 
Brass said:
Clayton, why do you feel you are entitled to 100% of the evidence in a case? If this was an inside job, then why allow the news about contractors not being able to take pictures slip out in the media?
Click to expand...

It's pretty much of a warning to everyone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom