LDS

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pup, There are many legal ramifications which could be the topic for another thread. For this LDS thread, sufficient to say same sex civil unions do not and should not require or need to use the word marriage, which is sacred to the union of a man and a woman.
Bull. The institution in question is and always has been a civil one in the United States and many other places, and marriage itself is as old as mankind. It is not sacred except insofar as people who engage in it decide it is as a personal matter. Churches are free to practice whatever form of it they wish, and in most societies religious marriage includes the civil in an arrangement many would consider pretty liberal toward churches. It is no more the business of one religion to control civil law on marriage than it is for them to dictate how other churches should practice it, or to make up civil laws on birth control or whether you should have to wear a hat.
 
It's an effective way to break down someone's self-esteem and gain more power over them. Just tell them that perfectly normal human behaviors are something to be ashamed of.

Great video. If biological urges like bowel movements are not sinful then why is sex a sin? Hint, it's not.

Why is Sex a Sin? (here's a hint, it's not)



However, claiming that it is a sin is a great way to control people.
 
Maybe Janadele can take this time off to learn about in whose forum she is posting her hateful and bigoted statements. I'm quite sure she has no idea, though not that it should make a difference.
 
Last edited:
Hell according to Leviticus we really should be just slaughtering each other in droves almost constantly. Eating shellfish, sassing a parent, wearing blended fabrics, entering church with a cut off penis, getting the wrong hair cut, getting a tattoo... all condemned.

Although all of those activities fell under ritual uncleanliness, there were different penalties for them. Death was prescribed for sins like adultery, striking one's parents, working on the sabbath, and homosexuality. So it's fair to say that yes, the Old Testament is the original source of the virulent homophobia, later expanded by Paul, and still preached today by many denominations.
 
Death was prescribed for sins like adultery, striking one's parents, working on the sabbath, and homosexuality. So it's fair to say that yes, the Old Testament is the original source of the virulent homophobia, later expanded by Paul, and still preached today by many denominations.

Yes, picking up sticks on the Sabbath was a crime which required the death penalty. Pretty harsh god if you ask me.

Norm
 
No Akhenaten I did not miss it. Our Heavenly Father does not reveal all to us, and to those who reject what He has revealed, even less is given.

Janadele, does the Heavenly Father reveal truth via human frauds and deliberate hoaxes?
 
Well, Leviticus 20:13 says to kill the gays.

True, but there are a LOT of things that got you executed in Biblical times that aren't death penalty cases today. The fact that it had a death sentence in the OT is not, in and of itself, evidence that it';s a Jewish purity law that should survive the Incident at Antioch.

Yes, picking up sticks on the Sabbath was a crime which required the death penalty. Pretty harsh god if you ask me.

Case in point.
 
I am curious about something. Janadele has posted some attitudes and beliefs in this thread that are, well, just plain awful. Janadele is an individual entitled to her personal prejudices, bigotry, and hatreds, and as she has freely admitted, we are entitled to respond with scorn and ridicule of her position.

However, she has stated these things in the name of the LDS Church.

So far, I have not seen any other LDS member speak out to unambiguously denounce the position she has claimed for the Church. I would have expected others to distance themselves from her morally bankrupt statements.

I find it curious this has not happened.

Hi jsfisher, of course I've spoken up in the past, and I feel that it's time to speak up again. No, Janadele does not speak for the Church, she speaks for Janadele and only Janadele. I have been shocked by some of the things she has said here on this thread in the name of the Church. Not to mention some pretty big untruths about what LDS believe, particularly pertaining to the afterlife. For example:

deaman asked "Is the end result that you will be a Goddess with your Husband?" To which she responded that she was a widow and he was a Presbyterian. Okay, but she said her deceased husband came to her son and asked to be baptized. Thus, since she believes that he asked for the baptism, and her son performed the baptism, then he'd be LDS right? So her answer should be Yes. "D&C 132 vs. 19-20"] Then shall they be gods, because they have no end..."

The other bizarre thing she brought up is the Hollow Earth. When Pakeha asked her if the hollow earth idea forms part of LDS doctrine, she ventured out on her own and basically said yes. Above she gave a list of scriptures from the D&C and then she told Pakeha the D&C is LDS scripture so therefore the hollow earth is doctrine. I gave a review of the scriptures, nope, no hollow earth there. :boggled:

Her determination not to engage in critical thought, but merely cutting and pasting and out and out plagiarism led to frustration and the opinion that Latter-day Saints "are incapable of independent thought." And Adman was not the only one to come to that conclusion. Making people angry or upset about the Church is not LDS teachings or doctrine. And what I don't understand is why she kept coming back! She just kept creating more and more hostility.

Her hostility in this thread has been unconscionable, and totally outside LDS teachings. Take, for example, D&C 4 where it talks about how the members of the Church should have "faith, hope, charity and love," toward mankind. Or the 13th Article of Faith that states that we should do "good to all men." Elder Christofferson says we "need to be civil and listen to one another and try to understand." Attitudes like I've seen here from Janadele, if I weren't already a member and know that she's the exception and not the rule, would have turned me away from the Church. I am embarrassed as a LDS, but not only embarrassed but deeply hurt. Along with just having other things to do in my life, that's one of the reasons I quit coming to this thread -- I just couldn't bare the pain of watching what was happening.

I treasure my religious beliefs, they are based on faith, not evidence. I know that there are discrepancies, and I can live with those. I find that being a member also makes me happy. The people have the same basic social needs (don't drink, don't smoke, dress conservatively), great work ethic, community service, strong emphasis on family...

Since the church is a church of continuing revelation, there can be changes (i.e. blacks receiving the priesthood, the coming and going of polygamy...) Maybe somewhere in the future there will be a prophet who retires to his prayer room and receives the same kind of message that President Kimball received about blacks, only it will be about the homosexual community. I don't know, all I know is that there have been some rather large changes within the church over the course of its history. The mere fact that the Church is beginning to address the issues with more seriousness, and setting up a website, etc. seems to tell me that maybe, just maybe things will change. I know the site says the church isn't softening on the subject, but from my many years within the church I'd say I'm seeing some ice breaking.

I have no ill feelings toward Janadele, personally. But the mere fact that she goes around starting threads on various forums about the LDS Church, and then refuses to discuss it in her own words leaves me saddened by the reflection it casts upon those of us who do openly and freely discuss our religion. I hope that Janadele can find the comfort she appears to be seeking.

One thing that I do take away from this entire thread is a greater love for those who are different from me. I've never exhibited any animosity toward anyone, at least I hope not. I have met some really nice gay guys lately, and you know what? They're just like everyone else with a need to love and be loved. Come on now, what would Jesus do? He loved everyone regardless of their differences, so why can't we?
 
Hi jsfisher, of course I've spoken up in the past, and I feel that it's time to speak up again. No, Janadele does not speak for the Church, she speaks for Janadele and only Janadele. I have been shocked by some of the things she has said here on this thread in the name of the Church. Not to mention some pretty big untruths about what LDS believe, particularly pertaining to the afterlife. For example:

deaman asked "Is the end result that you will be a Goddess with your Husband?" To which she responded that she was a widow and he was a Presbyterian. Okay, but she said her deceased husband came to her son and asked to be baptized. Thus, since she believes that he asked for the baptism, and her son performed the baptism, then he'd be LDS right? So her answer should be Yes. "D&C 132 vs. 19-20"] Then shall they be gods, because they have no end..."

The other bizarre thing she brought up is the Hollow Earth. When Pakeha asked her if the hollow earth idea forms part of LDS doctrine, she ventured out on her own and basically said yes. Above she gave a list of scriptures from the D&C and then she told Pakeha the D&C is LDS scripture so therefore the hollow earth is doctrine. I gave a review of the scriptures, nope, no hollow earth there. :boggled:

Her determination not to engage in critical thought, but merely cutting and pasting and out and out plagiarism led to frustration and the opinion that Latter-day Saints "are incapable of independent thought." And Adman was not the only one to come to that conclusion. Making people angry or upset about the Church is not LDS teachings or doctrine. And what I don't understand is why she kept coming back! She just kept creating more and more hostility.

Her hostility in this thread has been unconscionable, and totally outside LDS teachings. Take, for example, D&C 4 where it talks about how the members of the Church should have "faith, hope, charity and love," toward mankind. Or the 13th Article of Faith that states that we should do "good to all men." Elder Christofferson says we "need to be civil and listen to one another and try to understand." Attitudes like I've seen here from Janadele, if I weren't already a member and know that she's the exception and not the rule, would have turned me away from the Church. I am embarrassed as a LDS, but not only embarrassed but deeply hurt. Along with just having other things to do in my life, that's one of the reasons I quit coming to this thread -- I just couldn't bare the pain of watching what was happening.

I treasure my religious beliefs, they are based on faith, not evidence. I know that there are discrepancies, and I can live with those. I find that being a member also makes me happy. The people have the same basic social needs (don't drink, don't smoke, dress conservatively), great work ethic, community service, strong emphasis on family...

Since the church is a church of continuing revelation, there can be changes (i.e. blacks receiving the priesthood, the coming and going of polygamy...) Maybe somewhere in the future there will be a prophet who retires to his prayer room and receives the same kind of message that President Kimball received about blacks, only it will be about the homosexual community. I don't know, all I know is that there have been some rather large changes within the church over the course of its history. The mere fact that the Church is beginning to address the issues with more seriousness, and setting up a website, etc. seems to tell me that maybe, just maybe things will change. I know the site says the church isn't softening on the subject, but from my many years within the church I'd say I'm seeing some ice breaking.

I have no ill feelings toward Janadele, personally. But the mere fact that she goes around starting threads on various forums about the LDS Church, and then refuses to discuss it in her own words leaves me saddened by the reflection it casts upon those of us who do openly and freely discuss our religion. I hope that Janadele can find the comfort she appears to be seeking.

One thing that I do take away from this entire thread is a greater love for those who are different from me. I've never exhibited any animosity toward anyone, at least I hope not. I have met some really nice gay guys lately, and you know what? They're just like everyone else with a need to love and be loved. Come on now, what would Jesus do? He loved everyone regardless of their differences, so why can't we?

You are the kind of theist that I can get along with. Janadele's hate-filled vitriol, not so much.
 
<respectful snip for space>
One thing that I do take away from this entire thread is a greater love for those who are different from me. I've never exhibited any animosity toward anyone, at least I hope not. I have met some really nice gay guys lately, and you know what? They're just like everyone else with a need to love and be loved. Come on now, what would Jesus do? He loved everyone regardless of their differences, so why can't we?

Thank you for this post.
 
Cat Tale -

Thanks for your post.

It shows compassion, intelligence, tolerance and kindness towards others.

I don't believe in god or gods, so I attribute your principles to you. Not to an outside force.

You would be the same person, no matter what god you believed in, or if you chose to espouse no religious beliefs at all.

Cool people, are cool people.
 
Hi jsfisher, of course I've spoken up in the past....


Thank you for posting, Cat Tale.

From your earliest posts, you earned my respect. I was confident I knew your position on all the venom appearing in this thread in the name of Mormonism.

As I implied in another post, it really was skyrider44 I was hoping would respond. It saddens me that he allowed Janadele's hateful remarks to stand unchallenged as Church doctrine.
 
Thank you, Cat Tale. You rock.

I admit, I've done some bashing of the LDS Church here, but it came from relating some bitter personal experiences. I have tried to amend the bashing with the acknowledgement that not all members are so negative as Janadele, many are fine people, and there are positive aspects to the church.

I am not a theist, do not believe in any organized religion, but if what you take out of the church is as positive as you yourself are, then more power to you, and I respect that immensely.
 
Thank you, Cat Tale. You rock.

I admit, I've done some bashing of the LDS Church here, but it came from relating some bitter personal experiences. I have tried to amend the bashing with the acknowledgement that not all members are so negative as Janadele, many are fine people, and there are positive aspects to the church.

I am not a theist, do not believe in any organized religion, but if what you take out of the church is as positive as you yourself are, then more power to you, and I respect that immensely.

Agreed...
 
Ah, the excellent Cat Tale has made another appearance, and posted with her usual good sense and aplomb.

Tip of the hat to you, Good Lady!!

:th:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom