If you follow a more educated line of logic the Warren Report made efforts to trace and explain much of Oswald's influences. For instance they went into infinite detail on the magazines that advertized the Carcano rifle. Even with their extensive analysis CTer's managed to show there were serious flaws in their rifle evidence. They never did this with Albert Schweitzer College because they knew it was incriminating. There were no advertizements available to Oswald at Atsugi Airbase for that obscure college. No, he applied there all right. You're just ignorant of the facts. In fact it took the Swiss police two months to find it. Maybe they stalled deliberately so CIA could cover themselves and make sure there were no exposing problems with Schweitzer College in order to get their story straight. Main CIA player Percival Brundage was on Schweitzer College's board of directors.
Here is my response to another CT hawker that wanted to cite CT evidence wrt the rifle/number of shots evidence:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=9487770&postcount=103
But because you wish to get into it, here's a couple more things to consider:
Serious flaws in the rifle evidence exists only in the mind of individuals that A) don't know anything about marksmanship and ballisitics and B) people who have issues with reality.
In the example of ASC I've already provided a reasonable explanation for LHO's use of the name. Why you insist that LHO needed to see an "advertizements" to have knowledge of the institution isn't reasonable.
The assertion that there needed to be an investigation of who/what/where of ASC in relation to the events in Dallas is specious - as no evidence exists that LHO ever set foot there, the assertion carries no weight.
The reason Oswald applied there is because, if necessary, CIA could assign him academic credentials in order to get him into Moscow's Patrice Lumumba Institute. Russia's main school for teaching communist proliferation internationally. The reason CIA was sending false defectors like Oswald and Webster into Russia is because there was a deficit of information on the Soviet Union.
Bare assertion, facts not in evidence, and as LHO made no representation to the Sovs (that is known) that he wanted to attend PLI (he did evidently want to attend Moscow University) and the Sovs accepted him as a defector in any case w/o educational credentials being an issue.
Yeah, imagine the nutty CTer notion of a marine, who openly admits the intention of committing treason by giving radar secrets to the Soviets, waltzing in and out of Russia and back to America without any charges, being an intel asset. Imagine that!
Radar secrets? I'm not going to apply for the MDC here at the JREF behind this, but I can tell from that comment that you've never been in the military - half-assed article 15 prone PFC's aren't privy to "secrets" anymore than Senate Pages are privy to Presidential deliberations.
With all the "investigators" from Mark Lane forward trying to establish LHO as sort of intell mine for the Sovs, the best anyone can determine is that he had a "secret" clearance, which isn't much of anything. The assertion that he had some special knowledge of the U2 is specious also. and as far as radar technology, LHO was a scope reader, not a system tech.
Both the Sovs and the Chinese already had a pretty clear idea of U2 flight capabilities because they had tracked the aircraft themselves, and LHO for sure wasn't in the photo interpretation end of things and would know no more about that U2 capability than any other PFC.
As far as his "ease" of defecting, the Corps was probably happy to be rid of him, and contrary to Hollywood fiction, even back then with certain sorts seeing "commies" under the bed, a loser like LHO wasn't restricted from leaving the US, and if he wanted to go red, wgas?
You're way behind on this and need to catch-up. Marina said when she first met Oswald his Russian was so good that she thought Oswald was a Russian. CIA handler George Demohrenschildt said Oswald spoke nearly flawless Russian. Demohrenschildt was a White Russian. Why did he befriend an open Marxist and Castro supporter? Why did an intellectual like Demohrenschildt befriend your incorrigible loser Oswald?[/
Which version of Marina's and others' statements do you wish to believe? LHO scored "poor" on his Russian language aptitude test while he was still in the Corps, and She also has stated that she didn't think LHO was Russian, she said that she thought he was from one of the Sov republics because he spoke Russian with an accent.
LHO was earlier welcomed into the Dallas WR community because as he had just returned from Russia he was thought to have news of current conditions - when they learned through exposure to him that he wasn't exactly the socially communicative sort, and several of those individuals especially disliked LHO for his treatment of Marina and his apparent inability to act as a provider for his family, they dropped him as a member of that circle.
George De Mohrenschildt indeed befriended LHO, but in reading between the lines of the information available I believe he was more interested in getting in Marina's pants than being LHO's bestust buddy.
See, assertion is easy...
Oswald was seen with known CIA operators like Banister, Ferrie, and Shaw. He asked for a specific FBI agent when arrested in New Orleans. He called known intel asset John Hurt from the Dallas Police Station. It wasn't possible for Oswald to blow his cover. He was being handled at the deepest level. These people could literally change the face of the Earth to conceal Oswald and his CIA status.
LHO has been connected to the trio you specify above, mainly by our old friend Jim Garrison, who was a laughingstock of a NOLA DA long before he decided to solve the crime of the century. Anybody that believes that Carlos Marcello was a tomato salesman and stated such on the record absolutely can not be considered a reliable source of truth. The John Hurt call is indeed interesting, until you realize that the assertion that LHO was calling a handler is pretty thin (there was a Hurt contacted at one of the numbers involved that said he was an Army intelligence officer during WWII, but that doesn't mean a whole hell of a lot in 1963.)
This phone call also became an issue that surfaced with one of the better known JFK/covert action ******** artists - Tosh Plumlee, who's story on the events at Dallas is that he was part of a CIA op to
stop the assassination.
You do have one thing right above, but for the wrong reason - LHO couldn't
"blow his cover" because he didn't have a cover to blow.
Pure classic CIA character defamation propaganda nonsense in denial of the facts you are making excuses to get around above. By the way, how did Oswald know that Helsinki was the way to get in to Russia quickly?
I call 'em like I see 'em, and I'm not the first observer to note LHO's behavior and accomplishments up to the point where he started shooting people (Walker, JFK, Tippet) and come to the conclusion he was an inadequate personality.
LHO, like anyone interested in the subject at the time. knew that Finland, as a non-aligned nation had direct transportation into the Soviet. No secret handshake required.
You're playing word games against the obvious. Page 130: 'JFK And The Unspeakable' - The medical examiner of the bombing of the Buddhists in Hue said there was no metal shrapnel in the bodies of the victims and that the hideous injuries were similar to those of plastic explosives. Similar damage was seen in previous bombings in Saigon that were blamed on the Viet Minh, however the warlord General The admitted CIA had supplied him plastic explosives for those bombings. (More US false flags). The commies only had bombs with metal shrapnel. The medical examiner was persecuted because he refused to say the communists did it.
This paragraph is where you really fall flat on your ass factually and scientifically.
When an individual is killed by blast overpressure, the actual cause of death is fairly easy to establish (explosions in the real world don't go unnoticed) but there is no way, repeat
no way for the ME or investigator to determine high explosive type by overpressure injuries alone.
There is no explosive chemical composition that is unique to only one type of explosive - all common high explosive materials are comprised of binders and oxidizers and stabilizers, and since the 1990's here in the US, detection and identification taggants.
Show me some forensic evidence from the Saigon bombing and I'll go farther, but I think readers will get the gist.
What "the commies" had was all types of explosives and explosive devices, some factory made, many more in the south were IED's, and let me break this to you the nicest way I know.
What the Viet Minh/Viet Cong had the most of was US manufactured explosives recovered from dud aerial/artillery/mortar rounds as well as material stolen or diverted from SVN military sources.
Here's a pic from an AF EOD page:
From captured VC photos. A primary source of high explosives for VC clandestine munitions was retrieved 100, 500, and 750 pound US bombs that failed to detonate when dropped. In the foreground, two VC are sawing open a 750 pound bomb to gain access to the explosive. 7th AF EOD personnel would try to deny this source by detonating the explosives from shot down or crashed aircraft.
Again, "The commies" you reference had access to all types of exord and exord devices, and used them as they saw fit. The "facts" you assert above have no meaning w/o context, and if your ME tried to assert lack of sharp injuries as evidence of non-VM/VC involvement, he doesn't sound competent or someone that should be treated as a reliable sorce.