Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Chris, this is your cue to post something like this:

"Wow, I had no idea that we actually had so many human fossils. Thank you, JREF friends for helping me see the errors in my thinking. Although I continue to believe in Bigfoot, I see your point that it makes no sense for such a species to be absent from the fossil record."
 
I've never really bothered commenting on bigfoot.

If it actually existed, it would be pretty cool though.

A creature that can manage to leave no actual dna evidence, no matter how hairy. No reputable faecal matter and no reliable skeletal remains.

you would want to meet that
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Can you prove someone here a liar? Or is this all just bark with no bite? The floor is open to discussion and evidence. What will you add? Show me the pics of large collections of Hominid fossils that will not fit onto a table. Can you?
Click to expand...

You know that there are skeletal remains of Neandertal ? They have remains from over 400 individual Neandertal, including several nearly-complete skeletons.
 
Chris- Dr. John Hawks, when asked if the Fossils of Hominin could fit on a 6'x12' table said the following:

Dr. John Hawks said:
I suppose it depends how close you stack them, but 6x12 would only hold the Croatian hominin fossil record.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
ChrisBFRPKY said:
.
Click to expand...


Here is the truth. You have nothing. No bigfooter has any thing. You're all full of ****. There is no bigfoot.

It's hilarious to watch the BS getting slung. NOT. I have little tolerance for BS. I've heard about enough from bigfooters. Put up or shut up.

The ******** is all you have.
 
Okay, a person with a history of lying about having a bigfoot body says, "I have a bigfoot body and this type it's really real, cross my heart and hope to die, but I'm not going to show it to you until later.", and we're supposed to believe him, why?
 
CORed said:
Okay, a person with a history of lying about having a bigfoot body says, "I have a bigfoot body and this type it's really real, cross my heart and hope to die, but I'm not going to show it to you until later.", and we're supposed to believe him, why?
Click to expand...

It's the Lucy with a football/Charlie Brown syndrome. It's a real thing. :rolleyes:
 
Dinwar said:
Not all hominid species originated in Africa. Some originated after hominids from Africa spread into other parts of the world. The ancestral hominid was from Africa, and the first members of OUR species were African, but that doesn't mean that our sister taxa necessarily arose in Africa. An ecological shift as major as obligate feeding on a new source can certainly result in speciation, particularly if there is some genetic isolation (such as there being a huge distance between them and everyone else).

Think of it this way: My family originated in Ohio. That doesn't prevent my child from being born in California; all that means is that part of my family left Ohio and moved to California. Same with species: hominids arose in Africa, but that doesn't mean all individual species did, merely that the family did. Humans just happen to be one of the species that arose in Africa after the rise of hominids.
Click to expand...

But what taxa did they derive from, the same as orangutans or gorillas? I didn't think it would be anything closely resembling Giganto but do they even have an educated guess about it?
 
Jodie said:
But what taxa did they derive from, the same as orangutans or gorillas? I didn't think it would be anything closely resembling Giganto but do they even have an educated guess about it?
Click to expand...

That part I couldn't tell you without going to Google. Asian primates aren't my area of expertise.
 
River said:
Here is the truth. You have nothing. No bigfooter has any thing. You're all full of ****. There is no bigfoot.

It's hilarious to watch the BS getting slung. NOT. I have little tolerance for BS. I've heard about enough from bigfooters. Put up or shut up.

The ******** is all you have.
Click to expand...
wow. for a place that has a 'put up or shutup' attitude, you must know EVERY ONE out there in bigfooting and what they have or dont have to be able to say that.

wheres your evidence of what people do or dont know? your just as big a braggart as all the people in bf'ing that you claim to dispise.
 
ScannerHead said:
wow. for a place that has a 'put up or shutup' attitude, you must know EVERY ONE out there in bigfooting and what they have or dont have to be able to say that.

wheres your evidence of what people do or dont know? your just as big a braggart as all the people in bf'ing that you claim to dispise.
Click to expand...

Scannerhead:

I don't suppose you have evidence (empirical, practical, objective evidence, attested to by neutral investigators) to offer?
 
i never said i did. I was pointing out that HE is saying he KNOWS something he cant possibly know. he can assume or think or believe that theres nobody out there in the entire world that doesnt have any proof, but he cant know it in any absolute way.

it really is that simple to understand.
 
ScannerHead said:
wow. for a place that has a 'put up or shutup' attitude, you must know EVERY ONE out there in bigfooting and what they have or dont have to be able to say that.

wheres your evidence of what people do or dont know? your just as big a braggart as all the people in bf'ing that you claim to dispise.
Click to expand...

Please. It's "you're", not "your".

"You're". Short for "you are".

And "don't", not "don't".

And "despise", not "dispise".

I mean, seriously, if you are going to come on here and make a case for Bigfootery, it's far more impressive with proper punctuation and spelling.

Now, River said nothing about what people "do or do not know". People can believe whatever they like. But Bigfoot has never been proven to exist. There is ZERO evidence to support the existence of Bigfoot. No one has ever come forward with conclusive proof of Bigfoot. Getting my drift yet?

Therefore, if someone comes on here and says he knows Bigfoot exists, it's fair to ask why. It's fair to argue he is wrong because Bigfoot has never been proven to exist. It's fair to debate he is wrong because there is ZERO evidence to support the existence of Bigfoot. It's fair to state he is wrong because no one has ever come forward with conclusive proof of Bigfoot.

See how that works? All naysaying is fair in arguing the existence of a creature that, to date, only exists as a myth.

If you want to prove all those people who believe are right, then put the proof on the table. I bet it would fit.
 
ScannerHead said:
wow. for a place that has a 'put up or shutup' attitude, you must know EVERY ONE out there in bigfooting and what they have or dont have to be able to say that.

wheres your evidence of what people do or dont know? your just as big a braggart as all the people in bf'ing that you claim to dispise.
Click to expand...

Your entire argument rests on "you're all" meaning "all bigfooters". It's equally plausible--actually more plausible--that "you're all" means "you are all"--as in "you are entirely full of brown smelly stuff you're using as a substitute for actual evidence". At minimum there's no linguistic or semantic reason to conclude that the latter interpretation is flawed.

he can assume or think or believe that theres nobody out there in the entire world that doesnt have any proof, but he cant know it in any absolute way.
Click to expand...
Every test for bigfoot has proven false, and there has never been any evidence brought forward to support its existence. Certain epistemologies demand that any concept be supported by sensory data in order to qualify as knowledge; therefore, since no evidence has been presented (and the assumption that if evidence existed it would have been), we can in fact conclude that no one knows anything about bigofoot.

So yeah, there's a way. You may not like it, and it may not be a particularly good one, but it exists.
 
desertgal said:
No one has ever come forward with conclusive proof of Bigfoot.
Click to expand...
Has anyone even come forward with plausible circumstantial evidence?
 
ScannerHead said:
wow. for a place that has a 'put up or shutup' attitude, you must know EVERY ONE out there in bigfooting and what they have or dont have to be able to say that.

wheres your evidence of what people do or dont know? your just as big a braggart as all the people in bf'ing that you claim to dispise.
Click to expand...

Try replacing "Bigfoot" with "fairies at the bottom of the garden" and see what you get. Still feel the same?
 
ScannerHead said:
wow. for a place that has a 'put up or shutup' attitude, you must know EVERY ONE out there in bigfooting and what they have or dont have to be able to say that.

wheres your evidence of what people do or dont know? your just as big a braggart as all the people in bf'ing that you claim to dispise.
Click to expand...

Look son, if you really want to spend the rest of your life hiding in "it can't be disproven" land then I may join you with my invisible Unicorn.

If you have any evidence....anything at all, bring it forward. If someone has shot a bigfoot and has the body get them to throw it over their shoulder and march it down the mainstreet.

Do they do this? No....because they can't. All they can do is keep playing games to remain at the top of the group of simple minded people they target.


Some bigfooters are just simple and some are just dishonest, which are you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom